similar to: [LLVMdev] 100k LOC club

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] 100k LOC club"

2018 Jul 24
0
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
On 07/24/2018 07:50 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>>> on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: > > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: > > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html > > > but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on
2018 Jul 21
0
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to .getRequiredPackages2() ...here is a patch (untested) Index: src/library/base/R/library.R
2004 Nov 10
1
Problem with Shorewall/Routing VPN - LOC
Hello! I configured a pptpserver on my firewall and followed the pptp-manual from Shorewall. Login via VPN to firewall (internal ip: 192.168.10.2) is ok and I can ping this server via internal ip (and use it: add samba-shares, etc.). Unfortunately I can''t connect to other hosts in my intranet (LOC). Ping from vpn-client to clients in intranet fails, although Shorewall-Log shows an
2003 Oct 22
2
help seeing DMZ from LOC
I have a three interface network (net,loc,dmz). The internet interface (eth0) has a static IP. Windows machine in the local network (eth1) use DHCP to get IPs from the 192.168.10.0/24 netblock. The Debian machine in the DMZ (eth2) gets a fixed IP through DHCP in the 192.168.11.0/24 netblock. The DHCP server is running on the firewall machine (not ideal, I know, but that''s the way
2018 Jul 25
1
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
On 24.07.2018 23:37, Benjamin Tyner wrote: > > > On 07/24/2018 07:50 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>>>> ???? on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: >> ???? > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: >> ???? > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html >>
2010 Sep 02
1
Using library and lib.loc
Hi, I didn't find any post on this subject so I ll ask you some advices. Let's say that I have two library trees. Number 1 is the default R library tree on path1 Number 2 is another library tree on a server with all packages on path2. When I set library(aaMI,lib.loc=paths2) it loads the package even if its not on default R library When I set library(fOptions,lib.loc=paths2) it
2010 Oct 05
0
library: loading of required packages and argument 'lib.loc'
Hi, is there a reason why when calling the argument 'lib.loc' of library() is not used when trying to load the required packages? 0. Package A depends on package B 1. Install packages A and B in a subdirectory 'lib' of the current directory 2. Call: library(A, lib.loc='./lib') This will give something like the following: Loading required package: B Error: package
2002 May 14
3
[Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to fw::3128 not work (fwd)
I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules file to designate redirection/forwarding is too subtle for many users. For 1.3, I think I''ll do something like the following: Current rule: ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 - all New rule: FORWARD net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 Current rule: ACCEPT net fw::3128 tcp 80 - all New rule: REDIRECT net
2002 May 14
4
Redirect loc::80 to fw::3128 not work
The rule: ACCEPT loc $FW::3128 tcp www doesn''t work propertly, the http access does not redirect to squid but directly exit. what''s wrong? Thanks ------- Dario Lesca (d.lesca@ivrea.osra.it) -------------------------------------- @@@@@@@ this is my shorewall-1.2.13 config: #[/etc/shorewall/common.def]-----------------------------------------------
2020 Mar 05
2
Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS still say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"
Hi, I'm doing some tests of samba DC 4.12.0 + MIT (experimental) Kerberos + Bind DNS + Dhcpd + Chronyd on Fedora 32 beta. All work fine except this issue: The dhcp work, and the script for record the name of clients into dns is disable (like Rowland suggest). https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2020-February/134875.html If I join a new windows client to domain all work fine and
2010 May 31
0
miss.loc function in MCMC Geneland: can't make it work
I am trying to use the function 'filter.NA=TRUE' in Geneland. The function appears to be set on TRUE by default, as it appears as TRUE in the 'parameter.txt' file output and hence I do not need to enter the function per se (as it is an 'Unused argument otherwise') . Hence all my missing data (individuals that I have not yet scored at that specific loci) are scored as
2023 Mar 31
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr: remove unused loc variable
clang with W=1 reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/acr/lsfw.c:221:7: error: variable 'loc' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] u32 loc, sig, cnt, *meta; ^ This variable is not used so remove it. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/acr/lsfw.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1
2020 Mar 05
1
Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS still say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"
Il giorno gio, 05/03/2020 alle 15.07 +0000, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > I think I said use either the dhcp script or allow your clients to > update their own records. The problem is, if you previously used the > DHCP script, the clients records no longer belong to the clients, so > they will not be able to update them. Try deleting the records and > allow > the
2011 Aug 18
1
Bug: argument 'lib.loc' not passed on appropriately in 'library()'?
Dear list, I'm experimenting with setting up custom 'lib' and 'destdir' directories for my R packages. It seems to me that 'library()' does handle a custom 'lib.loc' argument the way it should for an arbitrary package but NOT for its dependencies on other packages. The latter are looked for in the default lib path (~/R/R-2.x.x/library) and NOT in the custom
2002 May 14
1
[Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to fw::3 128 not work (fwd)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:15 PM > To: Shorewall Development > Subject: [Shorewall-devel] [Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to > fw::3128 not work (fwd) > > > I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules > file to designate redirection/forwarding is
2018 Jul 21
3
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>> on Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:42:09 -0400 writes: > Here's a trick/workaround; if lib.loc is the path to your > library, then prior to calling library(), >> environment(.libPaths)$.lib.loc <- lib.loc Well, that is quite a "trick" -- and potentially a pretty dangerous one, not intended when making
2005 Apr 06
4
Publics IPs in a loc zone
Hi again, I have now configured a 2.0.8 shorewall with two interfaces: interfaces: net eth0 detect loc eth2 detect masq: eth0 eth2 the interface eth0 has the 192.168.1.10 ip and its connected to internet the interface eth2 has the 192.168.2.1 ip and its conected to a router (CMTS - Cable Modem Termination System)
2017 Nov 06
2
[RFC] Setting the current debug loc when the insertion point changes
> On Nov 6, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 6, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 6, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 6, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at
2002 Dec 31
1
Big Brother with Shorewall loc dmz zones?
How would I use Big Brother with Shorewall and my loc and dmz zones to monitor hosts in both zones? If Big Brother''s server is on my LAN (loc) is it "safe" to forward the bb port from the dmz to the LAN? What would the security risks of this be? Common sense says that it may not be a good idea to forward stuff from the dmz to the LAN, but I''m inexperienced and unsure
2005 Mar 11
2
Redirecting loc-net-loc request to loc
Ok. That''s probably really confusing. :) Here''s what I''d like to do. If it''s something that''s overly difficult or just plain stupid, let me know. :) I''m on cable with a dynamic IP. I have a domain forwarding account pointing to me. That is techiem2.no-ip.com. The firewall is 192.168.100.1. My web server is on port 444 on machine