Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug"
2014 Jan 18
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
David Davidson <ddavidson72 at gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from David Davidson <ddavidson72 at gmx.com> 2014-01-18 21:41:33 CET ---
Sorry
2011 Sep 27
3
[Bug 751] New: IPv6 bridging bug
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
Summary: IPv6 bridging bug
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ip6tables
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy: david at
2013 Jun 05
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com
--- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-05
2013 Oct 21
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #11 from Phil Oester
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
--- Comment #7 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21 14:57:00 CEST ---
Thanks David. It would be great if you could test a more recent kernel to see
if this issue has been corrected in the past 2 years. If you find you still
have the issue, try using the TRACK target in the raw table to see what is
happening with the
2013 Jun 20
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
--- Comment #5 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-20 18:16:30 CEST ---
David - please reply to request for additional information, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Jul 10
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
--- Comment #8 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-10 17:42:30 CEST ---
Typo in my last comment - meant to say TRACE target.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Jul 25
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
--- Comment #9 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-25 16:32:34 CEST ---
David - any chance to test this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Sep 18
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751
--- Comment #10 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-09-18 03:45:38 CEST ---
David - any update here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Oct 01
0
[Bug 755] change bugzilla account e-mail
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755
David Davidson <david at commroom.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #3 from David Davidson <david at
2011 Aug 09
0
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693
David Davidson <david at commroom.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |david at commroom.net
--- Comment #3 from David Davidson <david at commroom.net> 2011-08-10 01:26:47
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 663] Postrouting + IPsec + IPv6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com
--- Comment #2 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com
--- Comment #3 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21
2013 Jul 26
0
[Bug 663] Postrouting + IPsec + IPv6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Phil Oester
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #10 from Phil Oester
2013 Jul 08
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
--- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST ---
As noted, #2 is solved already. Also, /128 will no longer print (commit
945353a2).
But your #1 makes little sense to me: discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22. How
do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a
/22 mask?
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
--- Comment #6 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 03:50:27 CEST ---
Yes, I fully understand what is happening in the one specific example you have
provided. However you need to answer what happens if Cloudmark suddenly
decides to add an IP _OUTSIDE_ of that /22 that is assigned to them. Let's say
they open a new
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
--- Comment #8 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 15:56:45 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It is the duty of the software to properly execute that policy. Here, the
> software fails to do so because it produces duplicate redundant rules which are
> never used.
And where is it documented that the software
2011 Oct 08
3
[Bug 755] New: change bugzilla account e-mail
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755
Summary: change bugzilla account e-mail
Product: bugzilla
Version: other
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: netfilter bugzilla
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy:
2019 Nov 06
2
[Bug 1378] New: UDP IPv6 destination address not usable
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1378
Bug ID: 1378
Summary: UDP IPv6 destination address not usable
Product: conntrack-tools
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: conntrack-daemon
Assignee: