similar to: [Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug"

2014 Jan 18
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 David Davidson <ddavidson72 at gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #12 from David Davidson <ddavidson72 at gmx.com> 2014-01-18 21:41:33 CET --- Sorry
2011 Sep 27
3
[Bug 751] New: IPv6 bridging bug
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Summary: IPv6 bridging bug Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: david at
2013 Jun 05
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-05
2013 Oct 21
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #11 from Phil Oester
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #7 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21 14:57:00 CEST --- Thanks David. It would be great if you could test a more recent kernel to see if this issue has been corrected in the past 2 years. If you find you still have the issue, try using the TRACK target in the raw table to see what is happening with the
2013 Jun 20
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #5 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-20 18:16:30 CEST --- David - please reply to request for additional information, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Jul 10
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #8 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-10 17:42:30 CEST --- Typo in my last comment - meant to say TRACE target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Jul 25
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #9 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-25 16:32:34 CEST --- David - any chance to test this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Sep 18
0
[Bug 751] IPv6 bridging bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #10 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-09-18 03:45:38 CEST --- David - any update here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
2013 Oct 01
0
[Bug 755] change bugzilla account e-mail
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755 David Davidson <david at commroom.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #3 from David Davidson <david at
2011 Aug 09
0
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 David Davidson <david at commroom.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at commroom.net --- Comment #3 from David Davidson <david at commroom.net> 2011-08-10 01:26:47
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 663] Postrouting + IPsec + IPv6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com --- Comment #2 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com --- Comment #3 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21
2013 Jul 26
0
[Bug 663] Postrouting + IPsec + IPv6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Phil Oester
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Phil Oester
2013 Jul 08
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST --- As noted, #2 is solved already. Also, /128 will no longer print (commit 945353a2). But your #1 makes little sense to me: discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22. How do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a /22 mask?
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #6 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 03:50:27 CEST --- Yes, I fully understand what is happening in the one specific example you have provided. However you need to answer what happens if Cloudmark suddenly decides to add an IP _OUTSIDE_ of that /22 that is assigned to them. Let's say they open a new
2013 Jul 09
0
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #8 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 15:56:45 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) > It is the duty of the software to properly execute that policy. Here, the > software fails to do so because it produces duplicate redundant rules which are > never used. And where is it documented that the software
2011 Oct 08
3
[Bug 755] New: change bugzilla account e-mail
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755 Summary: change bugzilla account e-mail Product: bugzilla Version: other Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: netfilter bugzilla AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2019 Nov 06
2
[Bug 1378] New: UDP IPv6 destination address not usable
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1378 Bug ID: 1378 Summary: UDP IPv6 destination address not usable Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee: