bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2013-Jul-08 21:33 UTC
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST --- As noted, #2 is solved already. Also, /128 will no longer print (commit 945353a2). But your #1 makes little sense to me: discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22. How do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a /22 mask? What if they get assigned a new /24 net tomorrow, and add an IP from that /24 to the DNS RR? Then your rule addition is no longer valid. What you are attempting to do ultimately sounds like a bad idea, and not one that we should hack around to support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] New: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.