similar to: [Bug 89758] New: pow WebGL Conformance test with mesa drivers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89759 Bug ID: 89759 Summary: WebGL OGL ES GLSL conformance test with mesa drivers fails Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92136 Bug ID: 92136 Summary: WebGL Conformance conformance/textures/texture-size-limit.html -> system freeze Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97067 Bug ID: 97067 Summary: WebGL: conformance/glsl/misc/shaders-with-invariance.html Fail Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi! thanks for answering the many questions over the past years, now you can see the result: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=57516 A webgl demo that would not have been possible without clang+llvm. Greetings, Jochen

Thanks for the pointers and the quick fix. Perhaps the generated HTML code should issue a message like "Javascript load problem" instead of "You must enable Javascript to view this page properly," because the latter can be misleading. On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/09/2015 7:37 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

Jax v2.0 has been released. Jax is an MVC-based WebGL development framework, and the latest version is designed to integrate seamlessly with Ruby on Rails projects. For more information, see http://blog.jaxgl.com/what-is-jax/ For live in-browser demos, see http://sinisterchipmunk.github.com For detailed usage guides (similar in layout to the Rails guides), see http://guides.jaxgl.com For

On 11/09/2015 10:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote: > Hello, > > The recently created online "rgl Overview" at > https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rgl/vignettes/rgl.html > illustrates a problem that I am trying to resolve. > > At the bottom of each image block on that page appears the > advisory: You must enable Javascript to view this page properly. >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92556 Bug ID: 92556 Summary: System hangs at visiting WebGL site Product: Mesa Version: 11.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Hello, The recently created online "rgl Overview" at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rgl/vignettes/rgl.html illustrates a problem that I am trying to resolve. At the bottom of each image block on that page appears the advisory: You must enable Javascript to view this page properly. I am using Safari under MacOS with Javascript and WebGL both enabled, so it must be the

FYI, one platform where I have not been able to get interactive rgl working is iOS 8. iOS 8 is supposed to support WebGL, and Javascript is enabled. On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Dominick Samperi <djsamperi at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the pointers and the quick fix. > > Perhaps the generated HTML code should issue a > message like "Javascript load problem"

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46533 Bug #: 46533 Summary: Firefox WebGL with Nouveau 3D; user claims it came installed by default on OpenSuse 12.1 Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105629 Bug ID: 105629 Summary: WebGL shader regular update crashes nouveau driver 17.3.3 Product: Mesa Version: 17.3 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

On 12/09/2015 7:37 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 11/09/2015 10:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The recently created online "rgl Overview" at >> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rgl/vignettes/rgl.html >> illustrates a problem that I am trying to resolve. >> >> At the bottom of each image block on that page appears the

Hi, > Current llvm-gcc cannot emit llvm intrinsic function like llvm.pow.* and > llvm.sin.* > For example: > > double foo(double x, double y) { > return pow(x,y); > } > > will compiled into ll: > > define double @foo(double %x, double %y) { > %tmp3 = tail call double @pow( double %x, double %y ) > ret double %tmp3 > } > > This is not

Hi, > Sure. But now the question is the llvm-gcc will not emit llvm.pow.* anytime. indeed there seems to be no code in llvm-gcc to do so, though there is code for raising to an integer power (in llvm-convert). Please feel free to investigate and add some. Presumably it should turn gcc's BUILT_IN_POW into llvm.pow.*. That said, as far as I can see the C front-end doesn't generate

PS: It is possible that the C front-end doesn't need to explicitly produce BUILT_IN_POW because it is auto-synthesized somehow from a call to "pow". I wouldn't know. One way to find out is to compile a testcase and rummage around inside the gcc trees when they hit llvm-convert.

Hi, 2007/11/22, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: > > PS: It is possible that the C front-end doesn't need to > explicitly produce BUILT_IN_POW because it is auto-synthesized > somehow from a call to "pow". I wouldn't know. One way to > find out is to compile a testcase and rummage around inside > the gcc trees when they hit llvm-convert. Yes, they

On 12/02/11 04:52, Michael Smith wrote: [...] > With "gcc test.c; ./a.exe", the printed result is 6.50260946378542390000 > With "clang -emit-llvm -c test.c -o test.bc; lli test.bc", the printed result is 6.50260946378542480000 The x86 has got several different FPU instruction sets, which don't all work at the same precision. In particular, using 387 instructions uses

You may recall that in the early months of 2009 I was asking some questions about setting up a streaming audio server for a native-owned radio station. It is now up and running, and you're welcome to tune in. CHXL 95.3 CreekFM FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! Serving the File Hills First Nations, and the World! CreekFM is owned and operated by the Okanese First Nation on their reserve

Hi, Current llvm-gcc cannot emit llvm intrinsic function like llvm.pow.* and llvm.sin.* For example: double foo(double x, double y) { return pow(x,y); } will compiled into ll: define double @foo(double %x, double %y) { %tmp3 = tail call double @pow( double %x, double %y ) ret double %tmp3 } This is not consistent with llvm language reference. -------------- next part -------------- An