similar to: 3.12, ganesha and storhaug

Thanks Kaleb, I presumed as much. I did previously try with 3.10 but ended up running into issues with pacemaker. I guess same question applied, can you point to any guides to a full setup of Ganesha on 3.10? Thanks From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com>; "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at

Yeah I saw that, which is what brought me to the mailing list. Ta From: Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017, 14:04 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ganesha or Storhaug Not according to storehaug's GitHub page: > Currently this is a WIP content dump. If you want to get this up and running,

On 11/21/2017 08:59 AM, Jonathan Archer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and > noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. > > Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? > No, not yet. If you want HA clustered ganesha with glusterfs your best bet for now is to use

Hi all, I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? Thanks Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Gluster does the sync part better than corosync. It's not an active/passive failover system. It more all active. Gluster handles the recovery once all nodes are back online. That requires the client tool chain to understand that a write goes to all storage devices not just the active one. 3.10 is a long term support release. Upgrading to 3.12 or 4 is not a significant issue once a replacement

Thanks Kaleb, indeed, starting ganesha without HA works, but it's certainly not desirable, and everything is back to manual operations like in the old days. Do you have any time estimate for storhaug to be ready? Maybe it's worth to mention this in the documentation of 3.12 as well, otherwise other people will have the same problems. Cheers, ??? Alessandro Il 12/09/17 14:48,

On 09/12/2017 08:20 AM, Alessandro De Salvo wrote: > Hi, > I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. > The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO

Hi, I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO domain without the nfs support. It seems that in 3.12 (and

On 06/12/2017 08:10 PM, te-yamauchi at usen.co.jp wrote: > When using nfs-ganesha with GlusterFS, is it necessary to enable it with the following command? > # gluster nfs-ganesha enable > It is said that it is necessary to enable nfs-ganesha option when setting ganesha.enable on for volume. > It is said that setting of ganesha-ha.conf is necessary, but is it necessary to set up HA to

On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > >

On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: > + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists > about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. If you need HA,

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.

On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't help alot: https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving

On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: + gluster users as well. Just read another post on the mailing lists about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS Ganesha then? Cheers, Tom > Hey All, > > I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each > node.? ATM the

On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom > On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018

On 09/12/2017 11:35 AM, Alessandro De Salvo wrote: > Thanks Kaleb, > > indeed, starting ganesha without HA works, but it's certainly not > desirable, and everything is back to manual operations like in the old > days. > Do you have any time estimate for storhaug to be ready? It's been "soon" for a long time. It's still soon. > Maybe it's worth

Hi, I'm trying to find documentation for HA setup on Ganesha nfs in 3.12 version. But the documentation contains glusterfs-ganesha instructions, instead of storhaug. I'm new to the ha cluster setup and I am confused. Any information on it is very helpful. Thanks! Regards, Jeevan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet). You need to use 3.10 for now. On 07/06/2017 12:53 PM, Anthony Valentine wrote: > I'm running this on CentOS 7.3 > > [root at glustertest1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > > Here are the software versions I have installed. > > [root at

Hi Marin - again thank you for the help. I can't believe I coundn't find any info about this big configuration change. Even the Samba WIKI doesn't really spell this out at all in instructs you to use ctdbd.conf. Do I need to enable the 20.nfs_ganesha.check script file at all, or will the config itself take care of that? Also, are there any recommendations on which nfs-checks.d