On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't help alot: https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving with any sort of update now. Any plans to move back to the previous NFS Ganesha HA model with upcoming GlusterFS versions as a result? In the meantime I'll look to cobble up the GlusterFS 3.10 packages and try with those per your suggestion. What's your thoughts on using HAPROXY / keepalived w/ NFS Ganesha and GlusterFS? Anyone tried this sort of combination? I want to avoid the situation where I have to remount clients as a result of a node failing. In other words, avoid this situation: [root at yes01 ~]# cd /n -bash: cd: /n: Stale file handle [root at yes01 ~]# Cheers, Tom> On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: >> + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists >> about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. > > That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. > > Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. > > If you need HA, that is one "out of the box" option. > > There's support for using CTDB in Samba for Ganesha HA, and people have > used it successfully with Gluster+Ganesha. > >> >> Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS >> Ganesha then? > > Not that I'm aware of. > >> >> Cheers, >> Tom >> >>> Hey All, >>> >>> I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each >>> node.? ATM the configs are identical between the two NFS Ganesha >>> hosts. (Probably shouldn't be but I'm just testing things out.) >>> >>> I need HA capability and notice these instructions here: >>> >>> http://aravindavkgluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Configuring%20HA%20NFS%20Server/ >>> >>> >>> However I don't have package glusterfs-ganesha available on this >>> CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) and the maintainer's of CentOS 7 >>> haven't uploaded some of the 2.5.x packages yet so I can't use that >>> version. >>> >>> glusterfs-api-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-libs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-fuse-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-server-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> python2-glusterfs-api-1.1-1.el7.noarch >>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-cli-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>> >>> nfs-ganesha-xfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-vfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>> >>> The only high availability packages are the following but they don't >>> come with any instructions that I can find: >>> >>> storhaug.noarch : High-Availability Add-on for NFS-Ganesha and Samba >>> storhaug-nfs.noarch : storhaug NFS-Ganesha module >>> >>> Given that I'm missing that one package above, will configuring using >>> ganesha-ha.conf still work?? Or should I be looking at another option >>> alltogether? >>> >>> Appreciate any help.? Ty! >>> >> >> >-- Cheers, Tom K. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.
On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote:> On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html > > Hence the ask here.? storhaug feels like it's not moving with any sort > of update now. > > Any plans to move back to the previous NFS Ganesha HA model with > upcoming GlusterFS versions as a result?No. (re)writing or finishing storhaug has been on my plate ever since the guy who was supposed to do it didn't. I have lots of other stuff to do too. All I can say is it'll get done when it gets done.> > In the meantime I'll look to cobble up the GlusterFS 3.10 packages and > try with those per your suggestion. > > What's your thoughts on using HAPROXY / keepalived w/ NFS Ganesha and > GlusterFS?? Anyone tried this sort of combination?? I want to avoid the > situation where I have to remount clients as a result of a node failing. > ?In other words, avoid this situation: > > [root at yes01 ~]# cd /n > -bash: cd: /n: Stale file handle > [root at yes01 ~]# > > Cheers, > Tom > >> On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: >>> On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: >>> + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists >>> about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. >> >> That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. >> >> Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. >> >> If you need HA, that is one "out of the box" option. >> >> There's support for using CTDB in Samba for Ganesha HA, and people have >> used it successfully with Gluster+Ganesha. >> >>> >>> Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS >>> Ganesha then? >> >> Not that I'm aware of. >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tom >>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each >>>> node.? ATM the configs are identical between the two NFS Ganesha >>>> hosts. (Probably shouldn't be but I'm just testing things out.) >>>> >>>> I need HA capability and notice these instructions here: >>>> >>>> http://aravindavkgluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Configuring%20HA%20NFS%20Server/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> However I don't have package glusterfs-ganesha available on this >>>> CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) and the maintainer's of CentOS 7 >>>> haven't uploaded some of the 2.5.x packages yet so I can't use that >>>> version. >>>> >>>> glusterfs-api-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-libs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-server-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> python2-glusterfs-api-1.1-1.el7.noarch >>>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-cli-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> nfs-ganesha-xfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-vfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> The only high availability packages are the following but they don't >>>> come with any instructions that I can find: >>>> >>>> storhaug.noarch : High-Availability Add-on for NFS-Ganesha and Samba >>>> storhaug-nfs.noarch : storhaug NFS-Ganesha module >>>> >>>> Given that I'm missing that one package above, will configuring using >>>> ganesha-ha.conf still work?? Or should I be looking at another option >>>> alltogether? >>>> >>>> Appreciate any help.? Ty! >>>> >>> >>> >> > >-- Kaleb
On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom> On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug >> configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't >> help alot: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html >> >> Hence the ask here.? storhaug feels like it's not moving with any sort >> of update now. >> >> Any plans to move back to the previous NFS Ganesha HA model with >> upcoming GlusterFS versions as a result? > > No. > > (re)writing or finishing storhaug has been on my plate ever since the > guy who was supposed to do it didn't. > > I have lots of other stuff to do too. All I can say is it'll get done > when it gets done. > > >> >> In the meantime I'll look to cobble up the GlusterFS 3.10 packages and >> try with those per your suggestion. >> >> What's your thoughts on using HAPROXY / keepalived w/ NFS Ganesha and >> GlusterFS?? Anyone tried this sort of combination?? I want to avoid the >> situation where I have to remount clients as a result of a node failing. >> ?In other words, avoid this situation: >> >> [root at yes01 ~]# cd /n >> -bash: cd: /n: Stale file handle >> [root at yes01 ~]# >> >> Cheers, >> Tom >> >>> On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: >>>> On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: >>>> + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists >>>> about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. >>> >>> That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. >>> >>> Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. >>> >>> If you need HA, that is one "out of the box" option. >>> >>> There's support for using CTDB in Samba for Ganesha HA, and people have >>> used it successfully with Gluster+Ganesha. >>> >>>> >>>> Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS >>>> Ganesha then? >>> >>> Not that I'm aware of. >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tom >>>> >>>>> Hey All, >>>>> >>>>> I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each >>>>> node.? ATM the configs are identical between the two NFS Ganesha >>>>> hosts. (Probably shouldn't be but I'm just testing things out.) >>>>> >>>>> I need HA capability and notice these instructions here: >>>>> >>>>> http://aravindavkgluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Configuring%20HA%20NFS%20Server/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> However I don't have package glusterfs-ganesha available on this >>>>> CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) and the maintainer's of CentOS 7 >>>>> haven't uploaded some of the 2.5.x packages yet so I can't use that >>>>> version. >>>>> >>>>> glusterfs-api-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> glusterfs-libs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> glusterfs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> glusterfs-server-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> python2-glusterfs-api-1.1-1.el7.noarch >>>>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> glusterfs-cli-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> >>>>> nfs-ganesha-xfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> nfs-ganesha-vfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> nfs-ganesha-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>>> >>>>> The only high availability packages are the following but they don't >>>>> come with any instructions that I can find: >>>>> >>>>> storhaug.noarch : High-Availability Add-on for NFS-Ganesha and Samba >>>>> storhaug-nfs.noarch : storhaug NFS-Ganesha module >>>>> >>>>> Given that I'm missing that one package above, will configuring using >>>>> ganesha-ha.conf still work?? Or should I be looking at another option >>>>> alltogether? >>>>> >>>>> Appreciate any help.? Ty! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >-- Cheers, Tom K. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.