similar to: NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS"

2018 Feb 19
2
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't help alot: https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving
2018 Feb 19
3
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom > On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018
2018 Feb 19
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: > + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists > about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. If you need HA,
2018 Feb 19
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > >
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used
2018 Feb 26
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.
2017 Nov 21
1
Ganesha or Storhaug
Thanks Kaleb, I presumed as much. I did previously try with 3.10 but ended up running into issues with pacemaker. I guess same question applied, can you point to any guides to a full setup of Ganesha on 3.10? Thanks From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com>; "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at
2017 Sep 12
0
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
On 09/12/2017 08:20 AM, Alessandro De Salvo wrote: > Hi, > I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. > The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO
2017 Sep 12
2
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
Hi, I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO domain without the nfs support. It seems that in 3.12 (and
2017 Nov 21
1
Ganesha or Storhaug
Yeah I saw that, which is what brought me to the mailing list. Ta From: Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017, 14:04 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ganesha or Storhaug Not according to storehaug's GitHub page: > Currently this is a WIP content dump. If you want to get this up and running,
2017 Nov 21
0
Ganesha or Storhaug
On 11/21/2017 08:59 AM, Jonathan Archer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and > noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. > > Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? > No, not yet. If you want HA clustered ganesha with glusterfs your best bet for now is to use
2017 Nov 21
2
Ganesha or Storhaug
Hi all, I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? Thanks Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2017 Sep 12
2
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
Thanks Kaleb, indeed, starting ganesha without HA works, but it's certainly not desirable, and everything is back to manual operations like in the old days. Do you have any time estimate for storhaug to be ready? Maybe it's worth to mention this in the documentation of 3.12 as well, otherwise other people will have the same problems. Cheers, ??? Alessandro Il 12/09/17 14:48,
2017 Dec 20
2
gluster and HA NFS
Hello. After working with the 3.12 flavor of gluster I learned nfs-ganesha was replaced with storhaug in 3.11.Have people been successfully utilizing storhaug and does any documentation exist for using it in a ha nfs configuration or is ha in gluster so rarely used it's a non-issue for most gluster users? Going through the lists, it was recommended in November to not use storhaug and if
2017 Jul 06
2
Gluster install using Ganesha for NFS
After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet). You need to use 3.10 for now. On 07/06/2017 12:53 PM, Anthony Valentine wrote: > I'm running this on CentOS 7.3 > > [root at glustertest1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > > Here are the software versions I have installed. > > [root at
2018 Jan 03
1
[Gluster-devel] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
On 01/02/2018 11:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > ... > The people who were writing storhaug never finished it. Keep using > 3.10 until storhaug gets finished. > > > > Since 3.10 will be EOL in approximately 2 months from now, what would be > our answer for NFS HA if storahug is not finished by then? > > ?-? ?Use ctdb > ?-? ?Restore nfs.ganesha CLI
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/25/2018 08:29 PM, TomK wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster.? ( Used > Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) > > If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM
2019 Oct 02
3
CTDB and nfs-ganesha
Hi Marin - again thank you for the help. I can't believe I coundn't find any info about this big configuration change. Even the Samba WIKI doesn't really spell this out at all in instructs you to use ctdbd.conf. Do I need to enable the 20.nfs_ganesha.check script file at all, or will the config itself take care of that? Also, are there any recommendations on which nfs-checks.d
2018 Jan 03
0
[Gluster-devel] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <hetz at hetz.biz <mailto: >> hetz at hetz.biz>> wrote: >> >> Hi Amar, >> >> If can say something about the development of GlusterFS - is that >> there are 2 missing things:
2018 Jan 02
2
[Gluster-devel] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <hetz at hetz.biz > <mailto:hetz at hetz.biz>> wrote: > > Hi Amar, > > If can say something about the development of GlusterFS - is that > there are 2 missing things: > > 1. Breakage between releases. I'm "stuck" using GlusterFS 3.8 > because someone [removed]