Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "GlusterFS w/ NFS-Ganesha: Need working instructions."
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or
just post them on mail list?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote:
> Hey Guy's,
>
> A success story instead of a question.
>
> With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
> keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used
2018 Feb 26
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
Hey Guy's,
A success story instead of a question.
With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used
Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled )
If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the
written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.
2018 Feb 19
3
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the
future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your
suggestion.
Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've
given that. Ty. Appreciated!
Cheers,
Tom
> On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote:
>> On 2/19/2018
2018 Feb 19
2
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote:
+ gluster users as well. Just read another post on the mailing lists
about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer.
Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS
Ganesha then?
Cheers,
Tom
> Hey All,
>
> I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each
> node.? ATM the
2018 Feb 19
2
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug
configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't
help alot:
https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/
https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html
Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving
2018 Feb 19
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote:
> On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote:
> + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists
> about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer.
That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times.
Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x.
If you need HA,
2018 Feb 19
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote:
> On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug
> configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't
> help alot:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/
>
>
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/25/2018 08:29 PM, TomK wrote:
> Hey Guy's,
>
> A success story instead of a question.
>
> With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
> keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster.? ( Used
> Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled )
>
> If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM
2017 Jul 06
3
NFS Ganesha
Hello!
I am attempting to setup a Gluster install using Ganesha for NFS using the guide found here http://blog.gluster.org/2015/10/linux-scale-out-nfsv4-using-nfs-ganesha-and-glusterfs-one-step-at-a-time/
The Gluster portion is working fine, however when I try to setup Ganesha I have a problem. The guide says to run 'gluster nfs-ganesha enable' however when I do, I get the following
2017 Jun 13
0
About starting nfs-ganesha
On 06/12/2017 08:10 PM, te-yamauchi at usen.co.jp wrote:
> When using nfs-ganesha with GlusterFS, is it necessary to enable it with the following command?
> # gluster nfs-ganesha enable
> It is said that it is necessary to enable nfs-ganesha option when setting ganesha.enable on for volume.
> It is said that setting of ganesha-ha.conf is necessary, but is it necessary to set up HA to
2018 May 22
1
[SOLVED] [Nfs-ganesha-support] volume start: gv01: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.
Hey All,
Appears I solved this one and NFS mounts now work on all my clients. No
issues since fixing it a few hours back.
RESOLUTION
Auditd is to blame for the trouble. Noticed this in the logs on 2 of
the 3 NFS servers (nfs01, nfs02, nfs03):
type=AVC msg=audit(1526965320.850:4094): avc: denied { write } for
pid=8714 comm="ganesha.nfsd" name="nfs_0"
2017 Jul 06
2
Gluster install using Ganesha for NFS
After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet).
You need to use 3.10 for now.
On 07/06/2017 12:53 PM, Anthony Valentine wrote:
> I'm running this on CentOS 7.3
>
> [root at glustertest1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
>
>
> Here are the software versions I have installed.
>
> [root at
2017 Sep 12
0
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
On 09/12/2017 08:20 AM, Alessandro De Salvo wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view.
> The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO
2017 Jun 13
2
About starting nfs-ganesha
When using nfs-ganesha with GlusterFS, is it necessary to enable it with the following command?
# gluster nfs-ganesha enable
It is said that it is necessary to enable nfs-ganesha option when setting ganesha.enable on for volume.
It is said that setting of ganesha-ha.conf is necessary, but is it necessary to set up HA to use nfs-ganesha?
I would be pleased if you could tell me about HA setting
2017 May 01
1
Gluster and NFS-Ganesha - cluster is down after reboot
Hi Gluster users,
First, I'd like to thank you all for this amazing open-source! Thank you!
I'm working on home project ? three servers with Gluster and NFS-Ganesha.
My goal is to create HA NFS share with three copies of each file on each
server.
My systems are CentOS 7.3 Minimal install with the latest updates and the
most current RPMs from "centos-gluster310" repository.
I
2017 Sep 12
2
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view.
The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO domain without the nfs support.
It seems that in 3.12 (and
2018 May 08
1
volume start: gv01: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.
On 4/11/2018 11:54 AM, Alex K wrote:
Hey Guy's,
Returning to this topic, after disabling the the quorum:
cluster.quorum-type: none
cluster.server-quorum-type: none
I've ran into a number of gluster errors (see below).
I'm using gluster as the backend for my NFS storage. I have gluster
running on two nodes, nfs01 and nfs02. It's mounted on /n on each host.
The path /n is
2017 Dec 29
1
cannot mount with glusterfs-fuse after NFS-Ganesha enabled
Hi,
I've created a 2 node glusterFS test (Gluster 3.8).
Without enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client using
glusterfs option - everything works.
However, after enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client
using the glusterfs option (fuse), it fails with the following output (when
using the log-file option):
[2017-12-28 08:15:30.109110] I [MSGID: 100030]
2017 Sep 12
2
Gluster 3.12 and nfs-ganesha
Thanks Kaleb,
indeed, starting ganesha without HA works, but it's certainly not
desirable, and everything is back to manual operations like in the old days.
Do you have any time estimate for storhaug to be ready? Maybe it's worth
to mention this in the documentation of 3.12 as well, otherwise other
people will have the same problems.
Cheers,
??? Alessandro
Il 12/09/17 14:48,
2018 Mar 19
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote:
>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my
>> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage
>> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying