similar to: [Questions] About small files performance

AFAIK, and my setups thus far, unless you have NodeB’s public key in Nodes C-Z (with NodeB’s public/reachable IP configured in Nodes C-Z) *and* you have the PublicKeys for NodesC-z configured in NodeB, there is no way that NodesC-Z will be able to establish a connection directly with NodeB, and it’ll have to forward via NodeA (or any other node that do have a direct connection established with

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:03:30AM +0200, Keith Whyte wrote: > I have two tinc nodes (A and B) behind a firewall > > NodeA and NodeB have 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3 assigned on an internal > LAN, and they both have different public IP addresses forwarded to them, > port 655 udp/tcp > > I would like any given node in the C-Z group to be able to find Node B > on it's

Hi all I feel like I should know the answer to this question, like I read it someplace sometime, but it evades me right now. It's also an opportunity to say hello to the list and many thanks for writing and supporting tinc vpn! We make great use of it at rhizomatica. So, Let's take this example setup. I have two tinc nodes (A and B) behind a firewall NodeA and NodeB have 192.168.1.2

Hi Guus, I've been a huge fan of the GraphDumpFile parameter in tinc -- it certainly beats sending USR2 to tincd, and ploughing through syslog to figure out which nodes are connected. Could I request that GraphDumpFile dumps a little more data to the file, namely, the subnet; changing the output file from (for example): digraph { nodeA [label = "nodeA"];

I have an rsync server running on nodeA and a client, nodeB. I am attempting to do a sync/copy from the local machine, nodeB, to the rsync server, nodeA. The following line from the rsync man page makes it look like this is relatively simple: for copying from the local machine to a remote rsync server. This is invoked when the destination path contains a :: separator or a rsync:// URL. I have

hi guys I have a kvm quest & two nodes. a kvm guest on nodeA and IPaddr2 on nodeB(at this time) nodeA & nodeB comprise a HA cluster now... - nodeA can ping IPaddr2 IP - nodeB can ping kvm guest IP - kvm guest can get to nodeB's IP but* Only a bit non-common bit in my setup is: - both nodeA & nodeB be interfaces which are relevant to the subnet on which it operates are

From: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei at huawei.com> Subject: ocfs2: dlm_request_all_locks() should deal with the status sent from target node dlm_request_all_locks() should deal with the status sent from target node if DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG is sent successfully, or recovery master will fall into endless loop, waiting for other nodes to send locks and DLM_RECO_DATA_DONE_MSG to me. NodeA

dlm_request_all_locks() should deal with the status sent from target node if DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG is sent successfully, or recovery master will fall into endless loop, waiting for other nodes to send locks and DLM_RECO_DATA_DONE_MSG to me. NodeA NodeB selected as recovery master

llseek requires ocfs2 inode lock for updating the file size in SEEK_END. because the file size maybe update on another node. if it not . after call llseek in SEEK_END. the position is old. this bug can be reproduce the following scenario: at first ,we dd a test fileA,the file size is 10k. on NodeA: --------- 1) open the test fileA, lseek the end of file. and print the position. 2) close the test

You have a typo in your routes: fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/6 abcd vs. adcd On 21 May 2015, at 19:35, Martin <martinmoen at gmail.com<mailto:martinmoen at gmail.com>> wrote: I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

Hi, i have sporadic connection problems with my rsync server. I have _no_ firewall involved and there is _no_ max connections set. rsync on the clients is started from cron via a bash script. There's also no permission problem. rsyncd runs as daemon (is not started from inetd). It sometimes works, but every third or fourth rsync fails with this message: rsync: failed to connect to

llseek requires ocfs2 inode lock for updating the file size in SEEK_END. because the file size maybe update on another node. if it not . after call llseek in SEEK_END. the position is old. this bug can be reproduce the following scenario: at first ,we dd a test fileA,the file size is 10k. on NodeA: --------- 1) open the test fileA, lseek the end of file. and print the position. 2) close the test

quoted from http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/redirect-gateway/ "In fact, one does not have to set the VPN_GATEWAY variable at all. In switch mode, the gateway routes are necessary" i don't get it. it's is too short to understand. is VPN_GATEWAY set by tinc in switch mode? and why is "In switch mode, the gateway routes are necessary" mentioned here suddenly? afaik,

this is the case: serverA [ CentOs 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver. 3.5.21 ] serverB [ CentOS 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver. 3.6.6-0.129.el5 ] clientA [ WindowsXP ] clientB [ WindowsXP ] The serverA shares via Samba the resource [test] [global] workgroup = DMIT netbios name = SAMBA server string = DMIT domain server interfaces = eth0

Hi, I have some problems and doubts connecting two asterisk servers. I have one asterisk (serverA), with 1 sip client registered (clientA). I have another asterisk (sever B), with another client (clientB). Now I want to call from client A to B and from B to A. Searching in google i find many configuration examples. For instance:

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Keith Whyte <keith at rhizomatica.org> wrote: > Is there a way to force NodeA or NodeB to "advertise" it's public IP to > the rest of the tinc network, or did I miss something really obvious? the config files can use DNS names, right? Have the nodes that you want to advertise their public IP addresses sign up with Dyndns or similar,

Hi, I''m looking to run several installation of a rails app. Each one has certain unique elements, like database.yml some and some css stuff, possible some templates as well. I''ve set this up like /w/sites/clienta /w/sites/clientb /w/sites/clientc Inside these directories there will be mostly symlinks to: /apps/myapp Urls for these apps will be: http://clienta.example.com

i'm planning to migrate a call center to asterisk, i don't understand if i can launch a resident application on the agent's client in relation with the queue the agent's is answering. For example: I have - queue A - queue B - queue C Agent 100 (logged in A.B,C) Agent 101 (logged in C) When Agent 100 receives a call from the queue A i'd like to launch his browser and point

Hello, I am trying to build a Samba standalone server to serve file sharing in our office for both Ubuntu and Windows clients. Ubuntu user will use mount.cifs to mount the share. Windows (XP/7) will use workgroup to access the share. I am using Samba 3.6.9 on CentOS 6.3 (64bit). Now I am having problem to setup correct ACL so please help me. Here is my situation: I'll have directories