similar to: Mailing list question

Hi, So this is a bit odd case. I have created 2 servers nodes (running CentOS 7.3) >From Client machine (CentOS 7.2) I mount to one of the nodes using: [root at CentOS7286-64 mnt]# mount -t nfs L137B-GlusterFS-Node1.L137B-root.com:/volume1 /mnt/glustervianfs/ When i created (touch) a file over the NFS: >From Client Machine: [revivo at CentOS7286-64 glustervianfs]$ touch nfs3file [revivo at

Hi, Does GlusterFS implement the Linux VFS functionality. I know its a user space FS, but user space FS should also implement VFS funtions. Is this true also to GlusterFS ? Thanks -- - Ilans -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170615/a29d0b2d/attachment.html>

Hi all, My infrastructure is GlusterFS with 2 Nodes: L137B-GlusterFS-Node1.L137B-root.com L137B-GlusterFS-Node2.L137B-root.com I have followed this guide: http://www.itzgeek.com/how-tos/linux/centos-how-tos/install-and-configure-glusterfs-on-centos-7-rhel-7.html/2 I have created a device, formatted as ext4, mounted it. The next step was to install gluster FS. I installed glusterfs 3.10.3,

On 06/15/2017 10:23 AM, Ilan Schwarts wrote: > Hi, > > Does GlusterFS implement the Linux VFS functionality. > I know its a user space FS, but user space FS should also implement VFS > funtions. > Is this true also to GlusterFS ? The way I like to think about it is GlusterFS implements the Linux FUSE API/ABI, which on Linux is integrated into the Linux VFS layer. For Macs

Meeting date: 05/02/2018 (May 02nd, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 * Download: <TBD> Attendance * Raghavendra M (Raghavendra Bhat), Kaleb, Atin, Amar, Nithya, Rafi, Shyam Agenda * Commitment (GPLv2 Cure) * Email and Patch * [amarts] 20+ people already have done +1. Will wait another

Hi all, A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, bug fixes for features, etc. Finally, we have taken some baby steps to get that ask of having better design and documentation resolved. We had discussed this in our

Hi All, First of all, happy new year 2018! Hope all of your wishes come true this year, and hope you will have time for contributing to Gluster Project this year too :-) As a contributor and one of the maintainers of the project I would like to propose below plans for Gluster Project, and please share your feedback, and comments on them. - *Improved Automation to reduce the process burden*

Hi Amar, If can say something about the development of GlusterFS - is that there are 2 missing things: 1. Breakage between releases. I'm "stuck" using GlusterFS 3.8 because someone support to enable NFS-Ganesha. from the gluster command has been vanished without anything mentioned in the error message what other commands replaces it. Judging from other people's answers - the

Hi all, Following the lines of Red Hat's announcement for commitment for better open-source model, along with many other companies (lead by Facebook/Google/IBM) [1], Gluster project is also proposing to have the COMMITMENT statement in its project. While we discuss about the same here, a RFC patch is submitted to review. [2] [1] -

Meeting date: 04/18/2018 (April 18th, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT <https://hackmd.io/yTC-un5XT6KUB9V37LG6OQ?both#BJ-Link>BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/qjebZ <https://hackmd.io/yTC-un5XT6KUB9V37LG6OQ?both#Attendance>Attendance - Nigel - Hari - Nithya - Kotresh - Raghavendra M - Shyam -

Hi, I am trying to understand how the extended attribute trusted.io-stats-dump works. setfattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/gluster_perf_stats/io-stats-pre.txt /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs I can see that the io-stats-pre.txt is created. But how and what happened in the background? And why I can't I see the attribute with getfattr again? getfattr -dm- /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs # file:

All, Thanks to Nigel, this is now deployed, and any new patches referencing github (ie, new features) need the 'DocApproved' and 'SpecApproved' label. Regards, Amar On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how > to use the features are one

This should be a pretty easy issue to reproduce, at least it seems to happen to me very often. (gluster-3.2.5) After storage backend(s) have been rebooted, the client mounts are often broken until you unmount and remount. Example from this morning: I had rebooted storage servers to upgrade them to ubuntu 12.04. Now at the client side: $ ls /gluster/scratch ls: cannot access /gluster/scratch:

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

Does anyone have any useful contact information for Broadvoice? I've been unable to call Argentina from my Broadvoice line for almost a month now. Their techs keep telling me they're "looking into it" but I get no real information. I've had several other tickets open for almost 8 months now. I called their PR company this morning and apparently they dropped Broadvoice

Hi all, This is a problem I''ve approached so many times and always worked around, that now I want to solve it once and for all. Say I have something like this: --- class X < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_wacky end module Wackinator class ControlAllWackos @@wackos = [] def self.kill_wackos @@wackos.each(&:kill) end end def acts_as_wacky

Hi, quick question about snapshot mounting: Were there changes in 3.12 that were not mentioned in the release notes for snapshot mounting? I recently upgraded from 3.10 to 3.12 on CentOS (using centos-release-gluster312). The upgrade worked flawless. The volume works fine too. But mounting a snapshot fails with those two error messages: [2017-11-13 08:46:02.300719] E

Hello, I would like to know please whether I can use Speex for Gsm-Efr coding? Best Regards, Ilan Borenshtein RT embedded engineer ASOCS Ltd E: ilan at asocstech.com T: +972 (0)3 9012090 Ext. 214 M: +972 (0)50 5745100 F: +972 (0)3 9032112 www.asocstech.com <http://www.asocstech.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

It seems that remote_form_for does not work with method = :get since it does not change the prototype call. Is this a bug? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe