Amar Tumballi
2018-Apr-02 05:10 UTC
[Gluster-users] Proposal to make Design Spec and Document for a feature mandatory.
Hi all, A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, bug fixes for features, etc. Finally, we have taken some baby steps to get that ask of having better design and documentation resolved. We had discussed this in our automation goals [1], to make having design spec, and documentation mandatory for a feature patch. Now, thanks to Shyam and Nigel, we have the patch ready to automate this process [2]. Feel free to review the patch, and comment on this. A heads up on how it looks like after this patch gets in. * A patch for a github reference won't pass smoke unless these labels are present on github issue. * Everyone, feel free to review and comment on the issue / patch regarding the document. But, the label is expected to be provided only by Project's general architects, and any industry experts we as community nominate for validating feature. Initially for making sure we have a valid process, where I don't provides flags quickly, expectation is to have two people comment about approving the flags, and then the label can be provided. * Some may argue, the rate of development can reduce if we make this flag mandatory, but what is the use of having a feature without design and documentation on how to use it? For those who want to provide Spec and Doc approved flags, you can have a quick link [3], to see all the tests which fail smoke. Not all smoke failures would be for missing Spec and Doc flag, but this is just a quick start. [1] - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AFkZmRRDXRxs21GnGauieIyiIiRZ- nTEW8CPi7Gbp3g/edit [2] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/pull/126 [3] - https://review.gluster.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=status:open%20project:glusterfs%20branch:master%20&title=Github%2520Validation&&Awaiting%2520Reviews=(label:Smoke=-1) We would like to implement this check soon, and happy to accommodate the feedback and suggestions along the way. Regards, Amar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180402/a37abfe3/attachment.html>
Amar Tumballi
2018-Apr-13 06:04 UTC
[Gluster-users] Proposal to make Design Spec and Document for a feature mandatory.
All, Thanks to Nigel, this is now deployed, and any new patches referencing github (ie, new features) need the 'DocApproved' and 'SpecApproved' label. Regards, Amar On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how > to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they > want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, > bug fixes for features, etc. > > Finally, we have taken some baby steps to get that ask of having better > design and documentation resolved. We had discussed this in our automation > goals [1], to make having design spec, and documentation mandatory for a > feature patch. Now, thanks to Shyam and Nigel, we have the patch ready to > automate this process [2]. > > Feel free to review the patch, and comment on this. > > A heads up on how it looks like after this patch gets in. > > * A patch for a github reference won't pass smoke unless these labels are > present on github issue. > * Everyone, feel free to review and comment on the issue / patch > regarding the document. But, the label is expected to be provided only by > Project's general architects, and any industry experts we as community > nominate for validating feature. Initially for making sure we have a valid > process, where I don't provides flags quickly, expectation is to have two > people comment about approving the flags, and then the label can be > provided. > * Some may argue, the rate of development can reduce if we make this flag > mandatory, but what is the use of having a feature without design and > documentation on how to use it? > > For those who want to provide Spec and Doc approved flags, you can have a > quick link [3], to see all the tests which fail smoke. Not all smoke > failures would be for missing Spec and Doc flag, but this is just a quick > start. > > [1] - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AFkZmRRDXRxs21GnGauieI > yiIiRZ-nTEW8CPi7Gbp3g/edit > [2] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/pull/126 > [3] - https://review.gluster.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=status: > open%20project:glusterfs%20branch:master%20&title=Github%2520Validation&& > Awaiting%2520Reviews=(label:Smoke=-1) > > We would like to implement this check soon, and happy to accommodate the > feedback and suggestions along the way. > > Regards, > Amar > >-- Amar Tumballi (amarts) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180413/3e20f9a3/attachment.html>
Niels de Vos
2018-Apr-13 07:04 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to make Design Spec and Document for a feature mandatory.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:34:12AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:> All, > > Thanks to Nigel, this is now deployed, and any new patches referencing > github (ie, new features) need the 'DocApproved' and 'SpecApproved' label.Great! I hope we'll get more written down how new features are expected to work and how users can benefit from them. I thought we had a document that explained the different GitHub Issue tags somewhere? Unfortunately I cant find it... Maybe someone can add it in the Contrubtors Guide? https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/Index/ Thanks, Niels> > Regards, > Amar > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how > > to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they > > want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, > > bug fixes for features, etc. > > > > Finally, we have taken some baby steps to get that ask of having better > > design and documentation resolved. We had discussed this in our automation > > goals [1], to make having design spec, and documentation mandatory for a > > feature patch. Now, thanks to Shyam and Nigel, we have the patch ready to > > automate this process [2]. > > > > Feel free to review the patch, and comment on this. > > > > A heads up on how it looks like after this patch gets in. > > > > * A patch for a github reference won't pass smoke unless these labels are > > present on github issue. > > * Everyone, feel free to review and comment on the issue / patch > > regarding the document. But, the label is expected to be provided only by > > Project's general architects, and any industry experts we as community > > nominate for validating feature. Initially for making sure we have a valid > > process, where I don't provides flags quickly, expectation is to have two > > people comment about approving the flags, and then the label can be > > provided. > > * Some may argue, the rate of development can reduce if we make this flag > > mandatory, but what is the use of having a feature without design and > > documentation on how to use it? > > > > For those who want to provide Spec and Doc approved flags, you can have a > > quick link [3], to see all the tests which fail smoke. Not all smoke > > failures would be for missing Spec and Doc flag, but this is just a quick > > start. > > > > [1] - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AFkZmRRDXRxs21GnGauieI > > yiIiRZ-nTEW8CPi7Gbp3g/edit > > [2] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/pull/126 > > [3] - https://review.gluster.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=status: > > open%20project:glusterfs%20branch:master%20&title=Github%2520Validation&& > > Awaiting%2520Reviews=(label:Smoke=-1) > > > > We would like to implement this check soon, and happy to accommodate the > > feedback and suggestions along the way. > > > > Regards, > > Amar > > > > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts)> _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Proposal to make Design Spec and Document for a feature mandatory.
- 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
- 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
- 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community
- Enterprise Application with O_DIRECT access