similar to: Installing old version of firefox

Fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266918

This is v2 of the 4/4 patch from the original series. Changes: - memoize the function this time - check packages are installed using rpm_package_of_string However I didn't combine the two case together, because the code is a bit simpler with them separate. Rich.

Just wondering if anyone might be seeing any similar frequent crashes of Firefox/GNOME/Nautilus lately. I have a couple of users who have reported a problem like this. Any ideas are welcome. Latest CentOS 5.5 w/patches, latest nVidia graphics driver, firefox from repos. | ###!!! ABORT: Request 0.0: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such | operation): file nsX11ErrorHandler.cpp, line 182 |

Been a while since I used seamonkey, but needed it yesterday. The old version I had installed (2.11) threw an error when I tried it, so I grabbed 2.12.1 from mozilla.com. It throws the same error: $ /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey & [1] 7050 $ XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/seamonkey/libxpcom.so: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Couldn't

Hello any help would be cool.. ./configure --enable-application=browser looks like its good then get an error after the compile configure: warning: Recreating autoconf.mk with updated nspr-config output after make. I get /usr/bin/ld: nsCOMPtr.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `nsGetServiceByCID::operator()(nsID const&, void**) const' can not be used when making a shared

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:25:49PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I for one am looking for decent replacement for firefox for at least 5 > years (no, do not suggest chrome, or google anything, please), still > without success. The bizarre with Firefox started shortly after a guy I > know (as undergraduate student in our Department) became production > director of Mozilla

Noticed firefox is one of the only critical sec. updates from 6.6. So I manually downloaded the rpm from cr repo and rpm -Uvh firefox-31.2.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm but it crashes with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: undefined symbol: gdk_window_get_visual

Yes David, I'm using a release 32 of Firefox to reach my olds C6100 IDRAC7 interface. The problem is for latest Firefox versions as they require libgtk-3 not available in Centos6/RHEL6 distribution. Today I use a very very bad solution to reach my switch with latest firmware version from the latest Firefox available in CentOS: I disable https and use http.... Even if it is on a private

Hi, I would like to propose extending the Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) mechanism in LLVM/Clang with a feature that allows users to explicitly link classes that have no inheritance link. Usually, if one class is used at locations in code where this class is not expected, this will create a CFI error at runtime, assuming the application is built with CFI enabled. However, in cases where the user

Hi Kostya, Please find attached the minimized motivation test. I hope it is minimized enough. If not please let me know so I can try to make it more minimal. Were you expecting something like this? Also I think the tests that I should provide along with the patch should be in a special format right? I think I should be looking at http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#test-cases, and

-krasin@ On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Enes Göktaş <enes.goktas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Kostya, >> >> Please find attached the minimized motivation test. >> I hope it is minimized enough. If not please let me know so I can try to >> make it more

In the referenced bug, a customer had installed a web browser called 'palemoon'. The RPM of this web browser provides and requires various core libraries, such as: Provides: libnss3.so()(64bit) # normally provided by 'nss' Requires: libxul.so()(64bit) # normally provided by 'firefox' Our previous algorithm -- inherited from the days when we used to run 'rpm'

Hi, I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week was running fine. With no error messages in console and in /var/log/messages the server simply stops responding. After a reboot everything is fine. The only change (that I could find) but that was not active before the first incident/reboot was the update of the kernel and friends. The server (is this can help) is a

As you noted the class links are actually of the whitelisting kind and not of the blacklisting kind. Doing this with an attribute is pretty interesting and sounds like a better fit to me. I think this could look something like: __attribute__((compatible_vtable_layout("JSComponentMath", "JSComponentImage"))) class ProxyClass{ public: ... } Would this be more admissible? On

On Sat, June 18, 2016 6:50 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > > The same Mozilla

This should be an easy one. I'm trying to get postfix going. I've never done this before. I followed the directions at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix. I opened port 25: iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT Here's an attempt to send mail: [motor at localhost motor]# mail -v larry.martell at gmail.com Subject: test test . EOT larry.martell at gmail.com...

Hi, As I''ve discussed before whenever we add USDT probes to a C++ function and call dtrace -l we get the mangled C++ name for the dtrace function, being listed :( Now the point of USDT probes is to abstract a higher level semantic construct for users to make use of. Surely it is not meant to be listing Unstable Interfaces (implementation details), such as the containing C++

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:30 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 September 2017 at 10:33, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I am trying to get a centos 6 system on the internet with a tethered > > iPhone. I can see the phone with lsusb as bus 001 device 011. A post on > > stackoverflow said I would need to run

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Clint Dilks <clintd at scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote:

Hi Chandler, There were five SEH releated patches posted in two threads in the last days. Two different patches in Martell e-mail starting this thread: the win64 seh (llvm) and the register names Three more related SEH patches in another thread: one for win64 seh clang, one for MinGW toolchain and another for unreachable prologue. To clarify and allow proper reviews for the different patches I