similar to: Failed to bind to uuid (GUID)._msdcs.DOMAIN NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS & IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

Hello everyone! I am having a problem while demoting a DC. The DC i want to demotes is still online. When i try to use the command samba-tool domain demote this is the message i get: root at hoorn:/home/newhang# samba-tool domain demote ERROR: Current DC is still the owner of 2 role(s), use the role command to transfer roles to another DC root at hoorn:/home/newhang# But after a fsmo show,

Hi Marc, Thanks for your reply. On 18/07/2014 21:19, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Fernando, > > Am 18.07.2014 20:14, schrieb Fernando Rodriguez: >> I am having a problem while demoting a DC. >> >> The DC i want to demotes is still online. When i try to use the command >> samba-tool domain demote this is the message i get: >> >> root at

Dear List , We are using intel 82599EB based SRIOV capable 10GbE cards on the host machine.The VFs are being assigned to the guest in pass through mode and are providing the network connectivity as expected. However when we shutdown the guest the connectivity does not comes back via the VFs on the guest in next boot unless the VFs are detached from the *guest* *before* initiating a shutdown of

Hello everybody. I'm using Rstudio in LMDE (64 bits) with xfce desktop. When I'm connecting , I don't have any problem to start Rstudio , but when I am not connecting Rstudio don't start. Any idea? In rsession-user.log I get 29 Nov 2012 23:07:50 [rsession-jose] ERROR asio.netdb error 1 (Host not found (authoritative)); OCCURRED AT: core::Error

Hi, I'm using libvirt and qemu on Debian Wheezy. I'm having a strange behavior. Guests can't connect to each other when they're on the same host. On the host I'm using bonding (in active / backup mode) and vlan. It looks like this : eth0 \ / macvtap0 bond0 --- vlan222 eth1 / \ macvtap1 So I've got two guests, let's say A and B. When

Hi, Unable to do peer probe... and unable to figure out whats the reason from the gluster log. can someone help ? 1) This is what i was trying... gluster> peer probe llm19.in.ibm.com Probe unsuccessful Probe returned with unknown errno 107 gluster> peer probe 9.124.111.25 Probe unsuccessful Probe returned with unknown errno 107 gluster> peer status Number of Peers: 1 Hostname:

Hello. I have this settings of imapc: # doveconf -a | grep imapc imapc_features = imapc_host = imapc_list_prefix = imapc_master_user = imapc_max_idle_time = 29 mins imapc_password = imapc_port = 143 imapc_rawlog_dir = imapc_ssl = no imapc_ssl_ca_dir = imapc_ssl_verify = yes imapc_user = %u and try to sync mailbox on old server and new one: $ dsync -o imapc_user="user at example.org"

Hey, Due to a security issue in the moinmoin wiki software, the FreeBSD wiki will be offline for a bit. I do not yet know if the issue actually has been exploited in the FreeBSD wiki (haven't had the time yet to examine it), but I took the wiki down just in case. Note that even if the software was compromised, it was considered untrusted from the start and as such heavily sandboxed

Hi all, In our setup we would like that all users with a valid account use their username to print, while users with no account use the guest account. How can we do that. If we use: [printers] .. .. public = yes guest account = nobody .. .. then all users are printing on the guest account. On the other hand, if we use [printers] .. .. public = no valid users = .....,DummyAccount write list =

Hi, When "playing" with Cent OS 5.x Virtualization, I could have a host with IP:192.168.10.40 and the guests with IP's: 192.168.10.41, 192.168.10.42... an so on. But now after installing Cent OS 6.0 as a host, I can't figure out how to make my guest get the same IP's. My host is still 192.168.10.40, but the 1. guest i make, get an IP of 192.168.122.x ! I can see

Hello All First, sorry by my poor english, hope you understand me :-) I have a problem, i don't understand or don't know how to solve I need to interconnect 2 networks with different numbers. One is 192.168.236.0/24 the other 192.168.1.0/24. Mainly i need to access services in the 236. from the 1. one. I have a CentOS 5.5 machine with 2 nics each one configured to work in one of the

I can't see samba server linux( suse 7.2 ) from win 2000 server although i install samba & i configure smb.conf, so if i configure in smb.conf, public=yes i can see samba server well but if i comment it only i can see workgroup & share folder and then asked passwd & user then i type my user & passwd that in samba server wac created but don't accept it, although in

Hello, I am changing 2 x Gentoo/Samba 4.1 AD DCs for 2 x Ubuntu/Samba 4.7 AD DCs. I have joined the 2 new DCs and transferred the role to #3. I am performing sysvol replication from #3 to #4 quite happily with no errors. I have left them for 2 weeks. Windows desktops, etc. appear fine with no problems. I now want to demote and remove #1 and #2 from the domain and network. In preparation, I

On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:33:19 +0000 Paul Littlefield via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I am changing 2 x Gentoo/Samba 4.1 AD DCs for 2 x Ubuntu/Samba 4.7 AD > DCs. > > I have joined the 2 new DCs and transferred the role to #3. > > I am performing sysvol replication from #3 to #4 quite happily with > no errors. > > I have left them

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-5.2 Hi, We're seeing weird behaviour regarding network traffic between a Xen dom0 and domU. I reported this issue yesterday to the openvswitch-discuss mailing list, but it seems this could also be a (regression?) bug in the xen hypervisor or the linux kernel... (we've upgraded xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 -> 4.0.1-5.2 and

Hi all, I have been testing network throughput and latency and I was wondering if my measurements are as expected. For the test, I used Fedora 17 for both host and guest, using kernel 3.5.2-3.fc17.86_64. Pinging an external server on the LAN from the host, using a gigabit interface, the results are: # ping -c 10 172.16.1.1 PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

Hi all, I have been testing network throughput and latency and I was wondering if my measurements are as expected. For the test, I used Fedora 17 for both host and guest, using kernel 3.5.2-3.fc17.86_64. Pinging an external server on the LAN from the host, using a gigabit interface, the results are: # ping -c 10 172.16.1.1 PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

********************************************************************** CALL FOR PARTICIPATION ====================== The 8th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing Karlsruhe, Germany June 14-18, 2011 http://icac2011.cis.fiu.edu

********************************************************************** CALL FOR PARTICIPATION ====================== The 8th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing Karlsruhe, Germany June 14-18, 2011 http://icac2011.cis.fiu.edu

Hi, My Samba 4.1.x server is connected to two networks, one in the 192.168.* range (wired) and one in the 10.* range (wifi). The clients on either network normally cannot reach each other. I noticed Samba hands out (eg: for dcname.company.net) it's IP's from both ranges to clients on both sides. So the 192.168.* clients get two A records: 192.168.1.1 & 10.0.0.2. I noticed that,