similar to: High packet loss under load

Hi, Tinc (1.0.24, GNU/Linux) has proven very unreliable under load. We have several nodes connected, and some of them use another node as default gateway to get a secured internet connection. Both of these nodes work great and have a stable link when nothing but ping probes pass over the link. However, running a full Debian dist-upgrade, downloading a big mailbox, or just typing quickly in a

Am 18.03.20 um 22:26 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: >> Also "samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --tombstone-lifetime=0" >> does >> not delete the records with "dNSTombstoned: TRUE". Is this a >> different >> tombstone? > > That would be a different tombstone, yes. Can someone help me out with the ldap/ldb syntax to delte those by cron? >

Hello! We switched to VPN tinc, a network of about 20 machines in cloud, setting TCPOnly = yes, everything works fine, except for one host on Windows, which is loaded with traffic, losses amount to about 20%, set the setting ProcessPriority = high, no changes, before it used OPENVpn loss did not occur, do not tell me what settings can change to avoid losses? -- Andrei Rubtsov -------------- next

Am 16.04.20 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 16/04/2020 12:45, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: >> Hello alAl, >> after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the >> vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. > > The only change was to upgrade to 4.12.1 ? > > If there were no other changes, then Samba

Hello you all, with the new samba version out that fixes some problems with dns scavenging I have decided to try this feature. I was specifically interested for our reverse zone (PTR records) We have one zone for VPN clients 8.0.10.in-addr.arpa. I activated the feature in the smb.conf as well as in the Windows DNS manager. Entries are deleted (not visible in DNS manager) after a while. You can

Hello Lois, thanks for looking into this. Have you looked at what the original poster shared in the bug report? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14268 I don't have a big problem with this, just trying to help. Maybe the original poster can say more with regards of the problem he has with this. here are more of my details. Regards #####samba-debug-info.txt##############

So strange.. I copied your commando's only change the arpa and servername / domainnames All worked. So far nobody told how there ad-dc and DNS is setup.. Which i why i added : > > Debian 10, my own packages. > > Samba 4.11.6 + BIND9_DLZ is used . Now are you using samba DNS or BIND_DLZ dns ? That might help here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk

Hi, is there an option in samba 4.1.x to have an smbd require SMB3 encrypted transport on share level? I can't seem to find anything like it. Thanks, -- Michael Weiser science + computing ag Senior Systems Engineer Geschaeftsstelle Duesseldorf Faehrstrasse 1 phone: +49 211 302 708 32 D-40221 Duesseldorf fax: +49 211 302 708 50

Am 26.02.20 um 15:40 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > So strange.. > > I copied your commando's only change the arpa and servername / domainnames > All worked. Have you checked that you have this situation? If this entry "192.168.2.157" exists and if you try to add "192.168.0.157" another entry to point to "192.168.2.157" is added. >

Am 16.04.20 um 14:23 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Am 16.04.20 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 16/04/2020 12:45, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: >>> Hello alAl, >>> after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the >>> vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. >> >> The only change

Hello All, now that the BUG 14343: (s3: vfs_full_audit: Add missing fcntl entry in vfs_op_names[] array.) was fixed I wanted to try 4.12 again. This is the relevant config which has been running for years: vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit shadow_copy2 full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = pwrite write rename unlink full_audit:prefix = IP=%I|USER=%u|MACHINE=%m|VOLUME=%S

Hello all, we have an AD running Samba 4.12.5 on Centos8 using the packages from sernet. We enabled "Dynamic DNS record scavenging support" as introduced at version 4.9. This works as expected. However, some dynamic updates by the windows and Linux clients (not by the dhcpd server) are marked as static. This is totally random. I routinely delete these entries and sometimes they are

Am 24.07.20 um 14:51 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > > NFS shares != Samba shares and 'mounting' != hosting Samba shares ;-) > > Up until Samba 4.8.0, 'smbd' (the fileserver component on a Unix domain > member) could contact AD directly, but after 4.8.0 , smbd must now go > through winbind, sssd uses some of the winbind code, so it is > incompatible with

How about the one from the Samba Wiki. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member It is not a walk through but it covers the important points. Regards > Am 06.09.2020 um 01:34 schrieb Peter Pollock via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > ?I have a domain with two Samba DC's > > I don't want to use either of them as a fileserver, so

Am 24.09.20 um 13:29 schrieb Robert Wooden via samba: > I have some (for testing) Debian based client/workstation connected to my > AD. Signing to the AD works as a domain/user should. These clients can, via > Nautilus file manager, access shares on the file server manually that > the *signed > in domain user* is permitted to "see". I would prefer to connect these >

On 02.10.20 14:27, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I read that, about as much use as a chocolate fireguard if you want to > use winbind. pam_sss (or whatever it is called) is just a wrapper around > sssd and you cannot usee sssd with winbind, Red-Hat tells you this! Hi Rowland, this was true for Centos7 but for 8 it works fine without pam_krb5. If you have access you can see this

Am 20.10.20 um 19:36 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 20/10/2020 17:46, Stefano Vargiu wrote: >> Sorry, I don't get it. >> >> You?mean a domain member as opposed to a domain controller? >> In which way is it?going?to help? >> > You should really only use a Samba AD DC for authentication, so the best > idea would be to add a Unix domain member to the

What version of Samba is this and do you have "server schannel = no" set in its smb.conf? Regards Christian Am 09.11.20 um 15:31 schrieb Andrea Cucciarre' via samba: > The DC is a Windows AD DC. > Could you please clarify why i should change setting in the Windows DC > instead of the Samba server, which is the one that does the insecure > ldap bind? > >

Am 17.11.20 um 13:20 schrieb mj via samba: >> ,--- >> CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com >> >> >> |,-- >>

Am 24.07.20 um 12:57 schrieb Jason Keltz via samba: > > The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed to winbind was that? we are running CentOS 7. I know if I want to use the latest Samba 4.12 on the clients, I'll have problems with gnutls because it's outdated in CentOS 7.? Yes, someone has figured out a way around that by compiling a separate gnutls, but