similar to: [Bug 2227] New: Support version 6

Dear list, Attached is a patch that adds support for the SSH_FXP_LINK request, as described in draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-07 onwards, to the sftp server and client. It is for and has been tested on the current portable snapshot but also applies to openbsd CVS. Thanks, -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssh-sftp-hardlink-pcvs-v2.patch

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948 Bug ID: 2948 Summary: implement "copy-data" sftp extension Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer- extensions-00#section-7 OS: All Status: NEW

I am using sshfs with FUSE to mount a remote directory over ssh/sftp (on linux). It would be nice if df could be able to show the total size/free space of the mounted directory. I am aware that returning size/free space would have some limitations. For example, if a subdir of the mounted directory has another filesystem mounted on the remote server, this can not be represented simply. However,

>Is there a simple way to achieve this behavior? Is there a document on >the sftp protocol somewhere? http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt -- Darren J Moffat

Damien, Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any sftp server products that currently implement the uid / gid resolution or is this new draft just too unrefined / recent. Also, is there a definitive source for these drafts and where might they be published? Up till now I have just been reading the documentation available from www.openssh.org. I hope these questions aren't too

Hi, After reading the source code of openssh and man page of sftp. In sftp.h it define 27 /* 28 * draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-01.txt 29 */ 30 31 /* version */ 32 #define SSH2_FILEXFER_VERSION 3 and In the end of the man page, T. Ylonen and S. Lehtinen, SSH File Transfer Protocol, draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt, January 2001, work in progress material. In wikipedia of "SSH File

there is now a draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt if someone could please check whether sftp-server.c comlies :)

Reading 6.10 Dealing with Symbolic links in http://www.openssh.org/txt/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02.txt it seems to say that the first argument ('linkpath') specifies the name of the symlink file to create. ("linkpath' specifies the path name of the symlink to be created"). However, sftp-server.c:process_symlink() seems to reverse this. I.E. the first argument

Hello, I've gathered from searching Bugzilla[1][2] that a patch to update OpenSSH's SFTP implementation to support version 4 or above of the protocol is unlikely to be accepted. However, I find myself wishing for the name-based owner and group handling specified in version 4 of the spec[3]. As a possible compromise, if I submitted a patch to add an OpenSSH-specific extension to return

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Does anyone know whether anything is going on with SFTP (especially also with repsect to ACLs and XATTRs)? More than a year ago we saw this http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00 which apparently tried to restart the draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2428 Bug ID: 2428 Summary: realpath command doesn't work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Build system Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hello, This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. I currently use sshfs to mount directories from some computers and a NAS into other computers. I recently noticed that when copying some files from one computer into one of these sshfs

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286 Summary: SFTP keeps reading input until it runs out of buffer space Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

What to try: $ cd /tmp $ touch a b $ sftp localhost sftp> cd /tmp sftp> rename a b Couldn't rename file "/tmp/a" to "/tmp/b": Failure sftp> rm b Removing /var/tmp/b sftp> rename a b sftp> So, the sftp "rename" command refuses to rename a file to an existing one. Instead of using the rename(2) system call, which is present at least on

Sorry if this is not the best place to post this question but I'm not sure who else to ask. After reading through the filexfer draft I am having trouble understanding how a sftp client goes about resolving uid / gid to its text representation. Without handling this translation for the user, how do they know the difference between one uid / gid to the next without opening up a terminal to the

Hi OpenSSH developers, I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased with the work you've done. I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838 when using chmod sftp client command it appears that setuid / setgid bits are

Hello, This patch adds client and server support for transmitting the st_nlink field across SSH2_FXP_NAME and SSH2_FXP_ATTRS responses. Please let me know if there anything I can do to improve this patch. I am not subscribed to list so please CC me. Index: sftp-common.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/sftp-common.c,v retrieving

Are there any plans to support the SSH_FXF_TEXT file open flag (as specified in draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-08.txt) in OpenSSH's sftpd? How about some of the other extensions (e.g. retrieving MD5 hashes and UTF-8 filenames)? Thanks for any info, -- Jim Matthews Fetch Softworks http://fetchsoftworks.com

Hi, I have a strange situation where when I get different timestamps depending on if a use ls -l or ls -ln: --------------- sftp> ls -l -rw-rw-rw- 1 0 0 39649 Sep 20 11:30 C20060920.1115-20060920.1130 sftp> ls -ln -rw------- 0 0 0 39649 Sep 20 13:30 C20060920.1115-20060920.1130 -------------- The machine is in timezone UTC+2. According to the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX CC|