Matthew Grooms wrote:> Damien, > > Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any sftp server products > that currently implement the uid / gid resolution or is this new draft > just too unrefined / recent. Also, is there a definitive source for > these drafts and where might they be published? Up till now I have just > been reading the documentation available from www.openssh.org.http://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-05.txt Is the most recent draft. Discussion of the protocols occurs on the ietf-secsh at netbsd.org mailing list. I don't know of any server implementations that do filexfer-05. Perhaps some of the commercial ones do, but I haven't checked (and won't without licenses to do so). If it wants to interoperate with the majority of deployed software, any implementation that supports filexfer-05 will also have to support filexfer-03. Therefore I don't see a point in implementing the new draft until some issues are cleared up (including an O_NOFOLLOW equivalent for opening files) because then we would have to implement filexfer-03, 05 and whatever replaces it. The new draft is an improvement in a few areas, though. One of them being the transmission of user/group info. -d
Damien, Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any sftp server products that currently implement the uid / gid resolution or is this new draft just too unrefined / recent. Also, is there a definitive source for these drafts and where might they be published? Up till now I have just been reading the documentation available from www.openssh.org. I hope these questions aren't too annoying. If there is a better place to get answers for questions of this nature, please just let me know and I will get out of your hair. Thanks again for your help. I really appreciate it. -Matthew>________________________________ > >From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at mindrot.org] >Sent: Tue 4/27/2004 6:39 PM >To: Grooms, Matthew >Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org >Subject: Re: filexfer draft and uid / gid resolution ... > > >The version of the filexfer draft that OpenSSH supports doesn't support >user/group name resolution. We have access to numeric user and group IDs >only. > >Later versions of the filexfer draft do support this, but I have some >misgiving about them that I would like to see resolved before >implementing support for a new revision. > >-d > > >
Possibly Parallel Threads
- filexfer draft and uid / gid resolution ...
- [PATCH] Adds support for SSH_FXP_LINK request to sftp-server and sftp client
- [Bug 2948] New: implement "copy-data" sftp extension
- SFTP: a new command to get filesystem size/free space
- sftp transfer status feedback?