similar to: [Bug 2016] SCTP Support

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 Joshua Kinard <kumba at gentoo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2163|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #2329|0 |1 is

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8060 Summary: "hosts allow" in rsyncd.conf doesn't handle IPv6 subnets smaller than /64. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 Bug ID: 2590 Summary: Seccomp filter for missing architectures Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1646|0 |1 is obsolete| | CC| |vapier at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2572|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at

Hello, i have a question regarding SCTP support of OpenSSH. (I have searched the list, and it seems to show up periodically every two years, and since it's that time again i dare to ask...) It can't be described better than what i've placed in a bug report yesterday, so please let me (mostly) copy & paste that: Hello. I don't know how you do it, i never managed a(n

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seggelmann at fh-muenster.de --- Comment #9 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- *** Bug 2016 has

Anyone by chance got an Init script for /etc/init.d/dahdi on a SLES 10 box that'll work right? The one included by default only deals with debian and redhat, and the changes between the old zaptel script I have that works are far too invasive. Notably in the use of this "action" command that's probably redhat specific. There's practically zilch on google on the matter. I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 openssh at ml.breakpoint.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |openssh at ml.breakpoint.cc --- Comment #5 from openssh at ml.breakpoint.cc --- The link local address (fe80::) require the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 Bug #: 2016 Summary: SCTP Support Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo:

Hello, I''m going to be helping a friend setup Shorewall in place of his Cisco router on his home network. Shorewall will be acting as the router/firewall gateway for internet access for his home LAN. His connection to the ISP is via PPPOE. Nothing unfamiliar here to me. It will be a standard 2 interface setup. My curiosity was peaked when he said that he is going to be installing

Greetings, Are there any plans to import SCTP support to OpenSSH? There have been SCTP patches for OSX and FreeBSD, and those seem to work pretty decently. I guess there might quite a number of potential users for SCTP were it part of the common source tree. A second benefit of having SCTP support as a standard feature in OpenSSH for all platforms supporting SCTP would be kind of social pressure

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 proler at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |proler at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from proler at gmail.com --- on freebsd: with this patch i cant connect with sctp to v6-only host. v4

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #17 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Summary: SCTP support for openssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jchadima at

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Dan Cropp wrote: > Thank you Joshua. > > Out of curiosity, what is the maximum capacity you have heard for > simultaneous ConfBridges in a single box? (Looking at 3-4 channels per > ConfBridge) with recording. I don't really remember any specific values. 100? 200? -- Joshua C. Colp Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer

Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > Tom Eastep wrote: > >> Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: >> >>> Tom, >>> >>> Here is the setup method w/ Bridging on Gentoo. >>> >> >> Thanks, Joshua >> >> -Tom > > > Off topic - Has anyone cooked up a good web front end? I am messing w/ > IPCop, because one of my clients uses it.

Hi, I have written a patch to add SCTP support for OpenSSH on systems with SCTP capabilities with the following features: - SCTP support can be configured with --with-sctp, but is disabled by default - use SCTP for SSH connections instead of TCP - SCTP's multi-homing is activated for all available addresses by default, if SCTP is used - the sshd can be configured to listen with TCP, SCTP, or

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:22:19PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:06:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:35:18PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > > > On 04/02/2018 10:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > > > >>