bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-09 14:38 UTC
[Bug 1604] New: SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Summary: SCTP support for openssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com Created an attachment (id=1646) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1646) patch which solves the problem SCTP is network protocol similar to TCP. Openssh traffic can be transmited by SCTP instead of TCP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-18 18:36 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Maciej ?enczykowski <zenczykowski at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zenczykowski at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Maciej ?enczykowski <zenczykowski at gmail.com> 2009-06-19 04:36:58 --- (outside observer) While I agree that getting SCTP support for SSH would be real nice. The presented patch merely uses SCTP in (what is effectively) TCP emulation mode. SCTP offers a lot of features that mesh well with ssh, ie.: - seperate channels for stdin/stdout/stderr, for every port forward, for authentication agents, X forwarding, etc. - the ability to monitor IP addresses available on the machine the client or server is running on and add these to the existing connection - others? I realize of course that implementing all these 'features' would be a *lot* more work than simply using TCP emulation mode. However if we start off with TCP emulation mode won't we than have to support it for ever more - wouldn't it make sense to start of with a _real_ implementation? Is there a benefit to supporting ssh over sctp in tcp emulation mode? Won't performance be pretty much identical to using tcp? (really just food for thought...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-18 21:06 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 jchadima at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jchadima at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from jchadima at redhat.com 2009-06-19 07:06:51 --- The main benefit from using SCTP is access to non TCP accessible sites. Or blocked by firewalls or connected via pure SCTP network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-18 22:10 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 --- Comment #3 from Maciej ?enczykowski <zenczykowski at gmail.com> 2009-06-19 08:10:58 ---> The main benefit from using SCTP is access to non TCP accessible sites. > Or blocked by firewalls or connected via pure SCTP network.SCTP is not a new protocol the likes of ipv6, as such I'm not quite sure what you mean by a pure SCTP network. The only reasonable case of a pure SCTP network I can think of is in a test lab, where UDP & TCP have been blocked to promote SCTP. If a firewall is really restrictive enough to block ssh/tcp traffic then it will probably also block unknown protocols (ie. sctp) anyway - or it will implement the same policy for ssh/sctp as for ssh/tcp. Thus switching ssh from tcp to sctp will rarely help avoid the firewall. Since using SCTP requires both SCTP capable client ssh and server sshd binaries, with sctp access enabled, I fail to see how in all but very very rare cases this is an easier solution than getting a tcp port opened. (I've actually run sshd/ssh over sctp with an ld_preload tcp->sctp converter, and I'm mostly commenting here out of curiosity, since I'd really like to see a real ssh over sctp implementation) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-21 16:50 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 --- Comment #4 from jchadima at redhat.com 2009-06-22 02:50:57 --- a) many "firewals" are not so restrictive, so unknown => pass b) this is the first try of SCTP. If success there are other goals as QoS requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-21 19:09 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 --- Comment #5 from Maciej ?enczykowski <zenczykowski at gmail.com> 2009-06-22 05:08:59 --- OK, I guess I'm just hoping that this doesn't prevent a full-fledged implementation later on due to the need to maintain backward compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Jun-22 06:49 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 --- Comment #6 from jchadima at redhat.com 2009-06-22 16:49:31 --- I think that this is a basis of it. This patch brings a possibility to play with other SCTP features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2009-Oct-06 04:59 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P2 |P5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2010-Feb-09 17:02 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.or | |g --- Comment #7 from Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> 2010-02-10 04:02:32 EST --- What I need most is roaming between IP addresses, when e.g. switching between various wired and wireless networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2010-Feb-10 19:01 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Mark van Cuijk <mark at van-cuijk.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at van-cuijk.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2010-Feb-10 20:01 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 --- Comment #8 from Mark van Cuijk <mark at van-cuijk.nl> 2010-02-11 07:01:27 EST --- I'm interested in exploring the options for the SSH protocol to make use of the multi-streaming capability of SCTP as a Master thesis. As part of the project I'd like to explore several methods of mapping logical channels in the Connection Protocol to individual streams in SCTP, research the possible effect on confidentiality and integrity of these choices and implement at least on of the methods in OpenSSH. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2011-Sep-25 05:36 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Jan F. Chadima <jfch at jagda.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfch at jagda.eu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2011-Oct-02 22:01 UTC
[Bug 1604] SCTP support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Olivier Van Acker <cyberroadie at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cyberroadie at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 1894] New: ssh requests ipv6 addresses even with ipv6 disabled
- [Bug 1890] New: Entropy management for linux
- [PATCH] klibc: reproducible builds
- [Bug 1889] New: bug in packet.c sometimes cause segfault
- [Bug 1789] New: On linux use abstract socket for X11 connections if possible