similar to: [Bug 10555] New: checksum-reading.diff causes rsync to segfault with large amount of files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 Summary: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Bugs item #10555, was opened at 2007-05-03 11:48 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=10555&group_id=85 Category: win32-changejournal Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Dong Zhang (dzhang) Assigned to: Park Heesob (phasis68) Summary: wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert into

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5459 Summary: Large amount of files makes checksum count negative Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello, I use rsync (3.0.9) to make backups with the link-dest option, so that I keep daily folders, and I only upload the difference. However, when a directory is moved somewhere else in the tree, it is fully re-uploaded. Same thing when files are simply renamed, they are re-uploaded, not linked. First option could be to use --fuzzy twice (migrating to 3.1.0), but I think that it can be very IO

On 6/30/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > checksum-xattr.diff > Log Message: > A simple patch that lets rsync use cached checksum values stored in > each file's extended attributes. A perl script is provided to create > and update the values. Wayne, You should be aware of two drawbacks of caching checksums in xattrs: First,

Bugs item #10555, was opened at 2007-05-03 09:48 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=10555&group_id=85 Category: win32-changejournal Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Dong Zhang (dzhang) Assigned to: Park Heesob (phasis68) >Summary: wait call in while loop generate "bignum too big to convert

This is a suggestion for adding to rsync an option "--checksum-path=PROGRAM". Once this option is given, provided it is accompained by option "--checksum", both the receiving and sending side of rsync would compute checksums calling PROGRAM, instead of the usual checksum program. Why is this usefull? Suppose I have two collections of MP3 files at different locations which I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10552 Summary: Sender checksum calculation significantly slower with compression enabled Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi, our setup is Samba 3.3.12 as the Trusted Domain (Domain name: SAMBA) Windows 2008r2 as the Trusting Domain (Domain name: W2008) The trust itself works quite well, users of the SAMBA Domain are able to log into the workstations of the W2008 domain and even roaming profiles are working. However, when I try to configure permissions on a share of the W2008r2 server to users from the SAMBA

Changes: * Removed utimes() posix hack since scp.c moved to utimes() * Fixed waitpid() to be more proper. It was driving me nuts. * Made setsid() a #define in next-posix.h * Removed WCOREDUMP() from next-posix.h since we really don't support it and now #ifdef .. #else .. #endif around the single place it was used. * Fixed typecasting issue in sshd.c with sizeof() returning "long

Folks: When using rsync to copy huge amounts of data I've found that a significant amount of time is spent computing the checksums. Sometimes hours, ... sometimes days - it depends on the total amount of data checked! And after that sometimes it's only a few files that need to be updated. I've pulled the latest git (rsync-3.1.1pre1) and didn't see anything to address this (or I

This is a maintenance release of Puppet Dashboard. It includes contributions from Adrien Thebo, Chad Metcalf, Chris W, Daniel Pittman, Daniel Sauble, Devon Harless, Michael Stahnke, Moses Mendoza, Randall Hansen, Josh Lifton, and Nick Fagerlund. This release is available for download at: http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/ We have included Debian and RPM packages as well as a tarball

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448 Summary: Please include the --ignore-case patch by default Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at

Looking at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/patches/fileflags.diff -- It looks like the changes from fileflags-fixes.diff patch were applied to the patch from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.0.0.tar.gz , but this entire chunk of the that original diff file was lost: > diff -up a/config.h.in b/config.h.in > --- a/config.h.in > +++ b/config.h.in > @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@

Commit-ID: 2b71087f65f966488d55fc32b53255508d1a5e4c Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=2b71087f65f966488d55fc32b53255508d1a5e4c Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Sat, 19 May 2018 02:39:45 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: jobs: Replace

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there some limit on the size of a file system which can be shared via samba? I'm trying to set up a file server with a 100GB shared partition and it doesn't want to work. I'm running Fedora Core 4, and Samba Version 3.0.14a-2. The output from testparm looks like this: [root@stitch samba]# testparm Load smb config files from

Hi! I''ve been using Mongrel in a Rails setup with HAProxy as a loadbalancer. I used to use Pound, but HAProxy is much more performant and has the very nice option to limit the amount of requests sent to the backend servers/processes. In practice, this means that a new incoming request will not be sent to a Mongrel that''s already busy processing a request. There''s

Hi, What is the best way to format amount in RoR? e.g $12000.937 => $12,000.94 Thanks, Hari -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have the same problem with a Compaq dual xeon pIII 1gb and disk array. Did you fixed? Thank you Jose Galan

Hi all, Any ideas, why is this happening or how to debug this? After random time (usually one to three days uptime) inode-sz reported by sar jumps way up its normal level and <24 hours after this bug has happened server will crash. Server used to work fine, but started to do this around beginning of June. --- 08:20:00 AM dentunusd file-sz %file-sz inode-sz super-sz %super-sz