similar to: FTS lucene indexer-worker segfaulting

Hi! We found some problems with those patches, and ended up doing slightly different fix: https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/3e41b3d%5E...cca98b.patch Aki On 24.10.2016 10:17, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > Can you try these two patches? > > Aki > > > On 24.10.2016 08:48, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Ok so that timeval makes no sense. We'll look into it. >>

MISTRAL Informatique Clermont-Ferrand, FRANCE E@MAIL: mistral@wanadoo.fr I just installed a binary package samba.1.9.18p10 on my AIX 4.2.1.O Our network setup: the AIX-SAMBA server is on the same network with my WINDOWS NT 4 TSE Server. tiny smb.conf: [global] guest account = mistral [TRY tmp] comment = Tryi 4.2 path = /tmp writable = yes read only = no public =

I'm really sorry, but it was a long day yesterday. I forgot to mention that I used alpine:edge (based on the alpine master branch) image to set up the build environment. So there were some version changes. dovecot --version: 2.3.3 (dcead646b) apk info musl: musl-1.1.20-r2 description: the musl c library (libc) implementation Configuration was unchanged wrt to my first mail. Maybe it's

Hope this helps. There are no debugging symbols available for dovecot in the alpine repository. (gdb) bt full #0? a_crash () at ./arch/x86_64/atomic_arch.h:108 No locals. #1? free (p=0x55d949250660) at src/malloc/malloc.c:467 ??????? extra = 65 ??????? base = 0x55d94925060f "" ??????? len = 94391723427649 ??????? self = 0x55d949250650 ??????? next = <optimized out> ???????

On 21.12.2018 15.01, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote: > Hi, I now this is kinda impolite to ask, but I would like some feedback > on this issue. I'm representing the Mailu user group here, plus the fact > that my own production server is affected and starts to crash due to > file corruption as a result of the indexer-worker segfaults. Last night > my server became unavailable

Hi, i have a problem with libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4. I See segfault error to messages log, when dovecot store mail to INBOX. set 12 13:41:21 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[20285]: segfault at 38 ip 00007f575b68fc42 sp 00007ffc0272e750 error 4 in libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4[7f575b569000+188000] set 12 13:41:22 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[18871]: segfault at 38 ip

Hello, Am Samstag, 30. M?rz 2019, 21:36:12 CEST schrieb Peter via dovecot: > On 30/03/19 10:56 PM, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote: > > Maybe there is something wrong with his local yum/repo configuration. > > I'm tending to agree now. > > > CentOS 7 usually doesn't mix 32bit and 64bit packages anymore. > > > > Installiert: 2:dovecot-2.3.5-1.x86_64

Hi, I have other information. I analyzed the core dump: (gdb) core 22534 [New LWP 22534] Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by

$ gdb /usr/local/bin/doveadm `pwd`/doveadm.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty"

Hi, just try the Unitek Self Protek Mistral 1000ipF with nut and I doesn't work. How can I correctly configure it (if the driver support it). Best regards, In my dmesg: [42953293.620000] usb 1-2: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 7 [42953293.760000] usb 1-2: no configurations [42953293.760000] usb 1-2: can't read configurations, error -22 [42953293.880000] usb 1-2: new

I guess module ioatdma is missing in Centos 7:- 00:16.1 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset QuickData Technology Device (rev 22) ??? Subsystem: NEC Corporation Device 8372 ??? Kernel driver in use: ioatdma ??? Kernel modules: ioatdma # lsmod Module????????????????? Size? Used by autofs4??????????????? 27000? 3 sunrpc??????????????? 267620? 1 8021q?????????????????

Hello, I download and install it manual, this working now? waiting for next update to found out, yum is working correct again ;-) Thanks for answers, Am Sonntag, 31. M?rz 2019, 13:59:17 CEST schrieb Kostya Vasilyev via dovecot: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019, at 2:30 PM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am Samstag, 30. M?rz 2019, 21:36:12 CEST schrieb

doveconf -n attached, what else do you need? On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Please see http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html > > Aki > > > On October 23, 2016 at 2:32 AM larryrtx <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Any news Ali? > > > > > > Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7.

Hello, we have a bug on any xen kernel > 3.4 like this: kernel BUG at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel- xen-3.7.9/linux-3.7/fs/buffer.c:2952! [ 628.054552] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 628.054557] Modules linked in: bridge stp llc iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables nbd blktap2 pciback usbbk xen_scsibk openvswitch blkbk blkback_pagemap netbk xenbus_be gntdev evtchn ocfs2_dlmfs

Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? --Frank Elsner

Hello, All is correct on my system also a yum clean is make. But the dovecot = 2.3.5.1-1 is MISSING on the repositories !! Yum like to update to the new packages dovecot-lua and dovecot-imaptest but can't found the latest passed dovecot Version 2.3.5.1-1 The packages dovecot-lua and dovecot-imaptes 2.3.5.1-1 are found but not the dovecot version?? Am Freitag, 29. M?rz 2019, 14:49:29

I am using NFS over brtfs (vanilla 3.8.5) for heavy CoW to clone virtual disks with sizes 20-50GB. It worked OK for a couple of days, but yesterday it crashed. Reboot fixed the problem and I do not see any data corruption. I have a couple of different kdumps, I will include one as text and attach the other ones. I am using Fedora 18 with vanilla 3.8.5. The filesystem is created over a SAN volume

that seems to fix this kevent() problem, but I got the following lucene assert. Is that because of previous fails? Also, while I have your attention, is fts_autoindex supposed to work accross NAMESPACES? doveadm(mrm): Debug: Mailbox LISTS/vse-l: Opened mail UID=39483 because: fts indexing doveadm(mrm): Debug: Mailbox LISTS/vse-l: Opened mail UID=39484 because: fts indexing doveadm(mrm): Debug:

By deafult, CLucene installs the clucene-config.h header to /usr/lib/CLucene, but fts-lucene tries to include it from /usr/include/CLucene and fails. Here is how it is fixed in Fedora, for instance: sed -i '/DEFAULT_INCLUDES *=/s|$| '"$(pkg-config --cflags libclucene-core)|" src/plugins/fts-lucene/Makefile.in Indeed, Lucene's pkgconfig file reflects the fact that some

Hi, Mailing list archives suggest that this problem has been fixed in the older versions itself but I am getting the error still while trying to doveadm index a large folder of emails. Sometimes it throws error after 30000, something 40000, the latest it gave up after 111000. But it just never completes. 111000/322080doveadm: