Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? --Frank Elsner
am 17.02.12 19:48 schrieb Frank Elsner <frank at moltke28.B.Shuttle.DE>:> > Hi all, > > are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? > > Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again?THIS also interests me.> > --Frank Elsner > > > > > >-- Mit freundlichen Gr??en, with kind regards, Jim Knuth --------- Alle M?nner hatten schon immer Angst davor, da? die Frauen ohne sie zurechtkommen k?nnten. [Margaret Mead]
On 20.2.2012, at 19.30, Metro Domain Admin wrote:> On 2/18/12 8:37 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: >>> are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? >> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.1 > > Squat is apparently deprecated: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-December/062630.htmlYes, but it should still work..
On 29.02.2012 11:09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:> * Christoph Bu?enius <busseniu at in.tum.de>: >> On 21.02.2012 01:18, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> >On 20.2.2012, at 19.30, Metro Domain Admin wrote: >> > >> >>Squat is apparently deprecated: >> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-December/062630.html > > Looking at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Lucene now. > What else do I need for fts_lucene to work? Any 3rd party packages? > Libs? Compile Time Options?Build it with lucene support. --with-lucene Best regards, Morten
On 2012-02-29 9:30 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de> wrote:> * Morten Stevens<mstevens at imt-systems.com>: > >> This is a Fedora-specific problem, because clucene (build >> requirement) is not correctly packaged. > > Well, debian showed the same packaging (wrong place).I just attempted to update to 2.1.3 on gentoo and received the same error: /usr/include/CLucene/SharedHeader.h:18:36: fatal error: CLucene/clucene-config.h: No such file or directory So, is this also a packaging error that I need to report to gentoo? -- Best regards, Charles