similar to: Fwd: For the CentOS list: rkhunter and NFS

Hi, folks, rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the broken link. Anyone know how to remove the link from the rkhunter d/b? mark

On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 09:45 -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is > quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have > declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the > manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the >

in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting

I updated java-1.7.0-openjdk a few hours ago - it *was* listed as a critical security update, and I don't want yelling from rkhunter. The man page tells me I can tell it rkhunter --propupd <package name>... but it doesn't know the name above as a package. Been googling a bit, and cannot find a good example of a package (other than the manpage's coreutil). Anyone got an example,

Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] All file hash checks will be skipped because: This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not look like SHA1 or MD5. Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run rkhunter --propupd. Works. And then,

This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line HASH_CMD=sha1sum On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from > rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] > All file hash checks will be skipped because: > This system uses

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > > > Can't remember if I posted this before...

On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from >> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning

Nomii Pro wrote: > Nomiipro at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Having looked at the headers, I see that this is the new thing onlist - we're being spammed from gmail. Does this mean nixspam will be blocking gmail anytime soon? mark, tired of

John accused me of complaining about systemd... this here's *real* complaining. Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin' nixspam, because my giant hosting provider, that hosts millions of domains. Akemi has argued that nixspam works just fine (if so, then why did we get that spam a few weeks ago?). I've politely requested being put on a whitelist, and

Hi list, after a bit of struggling I found out how to cleanly install rkhunter ... maybe this is useful for you: * Download rkhunter (I downloaded v 1.2.8) * mv /etc/rpm/platform /root/etc_rpm_platform * setarch i386 rpmbuild -ta --target=i386 rkhunter-1.2.8.tar.gz * mv /root/etc_rpm_platform /etc/rpm/platform * rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm * wget

The latest version of rkhunter is complaining about "suspicious file types" in /dev/shm. Thing is, they're being created on the fly by R, and then seem to be a random name (5d1f...), and I have zero expectation that R will only create shm files beginning with those characters. For those running rkhunter, if you've run into something like this, how have you handled it - told

On Thu, August 27, 2015 9:29 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Gary Stainburn wrote: >> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have started again: > <snip> > > A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; > that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the domain. If many domains,

Dear Friends, I am using CENTOS 4.3 - kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL with rkhunter version 1.2.8, but the rkhunter program show me problem on file /bin/kill. I compare files /bin/kill with other CENTOS 4 and it has same size. ====================== SHOE LOG =========================== Rootkit Hunter 1.2.8 is running Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:56:44 -0200 Determining OS... Ready Checking binaries *

Gary Stainburn wrote: > Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have > started again: <snip> A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block the mailhost. I've been thinking about

Anyone seeing this? /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter: /usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne gevonden Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5 Thanks Patrick

I rebuilt rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm by using the spec and tgz from the rkhunter site (www.rootkit.nl). (I rebuilt it using his instructions.) However rkhunter does not do an md5 check. The box used to have fedora and each time there were updates it would complain that the some of the md5's don't match. I contacted the author using his contact feature on Wednesday but he hasn't

Alle, I know this is off-topic, so I apologize in advance, but we have installed rkhunter from EPEL (because it has the current version, 1.3.6 vice the 1.3.4 rpmforge version) on our CentOS machine and find that it does not remove the files in /dev/shm it uses for the SUSPSCAN test, this triggering a warning for said test. This was a known bug that was supposed to be have been fixed in V1.3.1.

Hi all, Debian Lenny, dovecot 1.0.15 My rkhunter script has picked up dovecot using port 1984 temporarily. When I run it now however, it is gone. Warning: Network TCP port 1984 is being used by /usr/lib/dovecot/imap. Possible rootkit: Fuckit Rootkit Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to check this. Does dovecot use this port for any reason? anyone seen this before?

Received -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:00 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide