similar to: mailman and yahoo

so... I've got some mailman lists running on centos 6. apparently c6 has mailman 2.1.12, which is far too old to have the dmarc patches (introduced in 2.1.16 and updated in 2.1.??, so of course, I'm having ongoing issues with yahoo/sbc/att/aol/etc subscribers and bouncing messages ending up causing 30%+ of my subscribers not to be able to get mail. These are mostly non-technical

On 04/11/16 17:18, Richard wrote: > [extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.] > > >> From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk >> Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016 >>> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400 >>> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> >>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at

[extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.] > From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk > Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016 >> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400 >> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>> ps. I

All, Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the

All, Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the

> Date: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 21:25:50 +0100 > From: Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com> > > On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: >>> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of >>> having been kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail >>>

Is there a repository with a newer version of mailman for CentOS 5? CentOS 5 ships with mailman 2.1.9 and it looks like I need some of the features of newer version of mailman to cope with DMARC issues relating to aol, yahoo, and hotmail with at least one of my mailman lists. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software --

On 8/1/2015 12:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > What do y'all do? build your own mailman infrastructure from > source? is there a 3rd party repo build of mailman 2.1.16+ ? ugh, and Mailman 3 requires Python 3.4, whihc isn't available on CentOS 6 without major jacking around. Is there an alternative 'new' email list handler people use? I have two sorts of lists,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header > > to the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list > > on planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header to > the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list on > planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple - period So, e-mail is hard these days, and mailing list e-mail is even harder. Read up about the interactions between

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > DMARC. Hi, Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. Regards Phil -- Google+: https://goo.gl/CPjvNo Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/ GitLab:

On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: >> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been >> kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's >> DMARC. > > Hi, > > Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. > > Regards > >

I want to copy a few user accounts to a new system... is there a more elegant way to copy /etc/shadow passwords other than editing the file? for instance, is there some way I can give the password hash to /usr/bin/passwd ? -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

On 11/24/2014 6:38 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > I will not go over the question about running telnet in your > laptop; others will chime in. Now that is out, did you check whether > telnet is running using ps and netstat? useless advise, since telnet is almost always run from a socket, the telnetd is only running if there's an active connection. to the OP, the *correct*

Thanks for the reply. I did clean installation of the CentOS 7 and wanted to install the list of packages in the above mail, but couldn't get them installed. Can you please help me in installing the above packages? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 2/9/2015 9:57 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > >> I would like to

On 2/18/2015 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md > kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage > and monitor. The raid level is defined per LV, instead of all LV's in > a VG inheriting the underlying raid. It supports all levels of raid > including 5/6. ... ... > ... > ... ... btrfs

Hey guys, Thanks for this response. I just wanted to get back to you to let you know how I was able to resolve this. And yeah I think it's more informative to use df -m or df -k, so I'll try to stick to that from now on. Especially when posting to the lists. But I took a look around on the disk and saw that the /var/ww and /usr/local directories were the biggest. So I just solved this

is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL? I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages... Installing: ffmpeg x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: a52dec