similar to: tinc bridge on pfsense

I've tried IRC in #tinc and #pfsense on freenode for this, not luck yet, figured I'd try the mailing list. A summary of my problem is here: https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/789xus/tinc_vpn_can_do_everything_but_be_accessed/ If there are any details I can provide that would help I'll be more than happy to. I'm hoping it will be something obvious that someone can say

WOW! OK! The light bulb above my head just came on. I added the script to the Subnet Up Script section, and now all the routes I need have been added in to the table for me. I did have to modify the line a little since I'm using pfSense (FreeBSD). I changed it to... route add "$SUBNET" -iface "$INTERFACE" ...I also used... route del "$SUBNET" -iface

Hello, Fortunately, the excellent pfSense gateway software offers a pre-packaged tinc directly in its official repository. This allows a pfSense machine to participate in a tinc mesh. However, experimenting with pfSense, I was unable (at least from the web interface) to figure out how to: - configure pre-packaged tinc to start with multiple partners (the equivalent of multiple Connect lines in

I just found that the VPN Netmask option in the pfSense tinc GUI is related to the "netmask" option in /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.117.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 What exactly is this line doing? Is it assigning the address that my lan adapter has to the tunnel interface as well? I'm interested in using tinc in production, so I'm trying to learn as much

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Darren Mobley <corpdecker at gmail.com> wrote: > I've tried IRC in #tinc and #pfsense on freenode for this, not luck yet, > figured I'd try the mailing list. > > A summary of my problem is here: > > https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/789xus/tinc_vpn_can_do_everything_but_be_accessed/ > > If there are any details I can

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Corey Boyle <coreybrett at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you know if the "VPN Netmask" option is specific to the pfSense > implementation, or does it correspond to a tinc config item? In Tinc, I believe each host has it's own Subnet, and that each such Subnet has whatever netmask it has. I believe there is no "VPN(-wide) Netmask" in

Hello Corey, Am Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:33:30 -0400 schrieb Corey Boyle <coreybrett at gmail.com>: > I just found that the VPN Netmask option in the pfSense tinc GUI is > related to the "netmask" option in /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.117.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 > > What exactly is this line doing? Is it assigning the address that my

when you say "home server" you want me to do this in tinc "histup" or somewhere else OR on the firewall? similarly do i have to add route on the PC that runs the tinc daemon? Regards Ramesh On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Ramesh wrote: > > > I have the following setup

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Ramesh wrote: > I have the following setup > > Home - Main Tinc server with public IP running on PfSense > work - tinc client running behind a CISCO ASA firewall with public IP running on Windows 10 > offsite - tinc client running on tomato router behind a double NAT > > Home & offsite connect & i can see all PCs &

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: [...] > FW-01 and FW-02 are Master/Slave firewalls (pfSense with Carp failover). We have currently 3 "remote offices" connected which have all basically the same setup, one office has more internet lines. > > Currently I have it

Are you sure B is correctly configured to forward packets at the layer 3 level between the interface of the "router" tinc and the interface of the "switch" tinc? (iptables, etc.) On router B, are you sure the node file for B on the "router" tinc is configured to announce the entire 192.168.15.0/24 subnet (i.e. Subnet = 192.168.15.0/24)? Otherwise B won't get the

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:41:00PM +0000, Chris . wrote: > I admit that I am not familiar with Tinc very well, but have Tinc running at approximately 20 sites and functioning as a mesh vpn/network. I am having issues adding an additional site as it will not communicate with the rest. I have taken the firmware of one and flashed it on another router to make it duplicate and then tested it

Hello, I have been using tinc for quite a while now and am very pleased with it. Thanks a lot to everyone involved in the project! I am running a VMware ESXi server in a datacenter that provides some services for me. The virtual machines are connected with different networks running on separated VLANs using VMware vSphere port groups. In order to use the services from my home network, I had the

Hello List, This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: +---------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | | | +----------------+ |

Hi Daniel, Yes, thanks and I should have mentioned that I am using pretty much the same thing you suggested on my routers, but for whatever reason couldn?t get that approach working on the linux box in question. Mark, Thanks for the upstart script. I had tried to do the same myself but couldn?t get my upstart script to work right. I was missing the ?-D? flag in my script. Added that and now

I'm really trying to do a client to server connection more than an ethernet bridge, but I couldn't figure out from the docs where that comes in. Client is Kubuntu Breezy, and server is Debian Sarge. Tinc was installed with apt-get on both systems. Version on server is 1.0.3, on client is 1.0.4. I've spent the entire day toiling over getting this set up. I had ipchains rules, etc,

Hello tinc folks, I?m new at Tinc networking, so if you only show me a link to a solution of my problem, I?ll be very happy. My problem is, I use a Tinc bridged network with 5 Fritz!Boxes routers to connect my whole family together. But I can?t use a DHCP service in the Tinc VPN, because if someone use DHCP request on a fare away location, he probability get my gateway for internet traffic,

lance: thank you! i was planning on most nodes being routers anyway, so that helps ^-^ Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants at gmail.com> Date:03/17/2015 12:33 PM (GMT-06:00) To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: Tinc GUI Frontend? On 3/16/2015 11:33 PM, Coyo Stormcaller wrote: > But none come close

Hi there I have the following setup Home - Main Tinc server with public IP running on PfSense work - tinc client running behind a CISCO ASA firewall with public IP running on Windows 10 offsite - tinc client running on tomato router behind a double NAT Home & offsite connect & i can see all PCs & devices & connect to them easily, on either side work to Home or offsite connects

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc versions 1.0.34. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.0.34: * Fix a potential segmentation fault when connecting to an IPv6 peer via a proxy. * Minor improvements to the build system. * Make the systemd service file identical to the one from the 1.1 branch. * Fix a potential problem causing IPv4 sockets to not work on macOS. Thanks to