similar to: Cisco SPA303 won't ring for more than 60 seconds

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Cisco SPA303 won't ring for more than 60 seconds"

2014 Feb 06
2
SPA112 Won't stay up
Hi all, I have an SPA112 that in sitting behind a Ubee cable modem. The internet link is solid, but the device becomes unreachable within a day or so of being rebooted. Then the customer goes to reboot the device, they report that all 4 lights are lit. The ISP reports that the device does respond to ping, so it's not completely dead. I've had the same symptoms with SPA303's
2012 Aug 01
2
Problem provisioning Cisco SPA303
Hello. I've got a Cisco SPA303 that I'm trying to provision via http. I noticed that this device looks very similar to a PAP2T, so I used that as a template for my provisioning file. However, the result is less than stellar. Line 1 registers and works. However, lines 2 and 3 also register as line 1, effectively giving me a 1-line phone with 3 buttons. Also, the line name is the
2013 Jan 18
3
Annoying delay after main server goes down
Hello, we have distributed lots of cisco spa303 IP phones and get them work with Asterisk. I have configured proxy and alternate proxy and enabled "dual registration" features in provisioning files(xml files). All phones are able to subscribe to both of servers. But the problem is, if main server goes down, i am obliged to wait nearly 20 second in order to place a call over second
2016 Dec 05
4
Cisco IP 8841 asterisk integration
True agree, problem is somehow the people purchased.... am supporting to overcome that. Trying level best... around 20 phones has been purchased.... ?? On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, 8:55 p.m. Victor Villarreal, <mefhigoseth at gmail.com> wrote: > With all the money you plan to invest in firmware, licenses, etc., you > have bought a Grandstream IP phone or Yealink... > -- >
2013 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses() causing failure in PickNodeToScheduleBottomUp() ???
Here is a bit more data. After PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses has been run, the following Predecessor/Successor links are 'dumpAll'ed. (I attach the full dumpAll before & after "Prescheduling SU #7 next to PredSU #4 to guide scheduling in the presence of multiple uses") SU(3) Predecessors: val SU(5): Latency=1 ch SU(7): Latency=1 val SU(7): Latency=1 SU(7):
2013 Aug 21
5
[Bug 68402] New: Some elements are only rendered in top-left area
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68402 Priority: medium Bug ID: 68402 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Some elements are only rendered in top-left area Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: janmlynek0 at gmail.com Hardware: All
2013 Sep 27
2
Is this SDP payload Asterisk created valid?
We have an issue with a customer where when calls are sent to one of their offices as soon as the call is answered the call fails. We are performing remote bridging and switching the audio from the server which initiated the call to our switch which is on the same network. After the call is answered we switch the audio which is accepted fine but we then send the following packet and get a SIP/488
2013 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] Broken PLT on ARM from R183966
lgtm On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > LGTM > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Logan Chien <tzuhsiang.chien at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have created a workaround to deal with the PIC function call. With > this > > patch, the FastISel will switch back to DAG lowering
2013 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] Broken PLT on ARM from R183966
Hi Anton and JF, Thanks for your review. After reading the source code more carefully, I have come up with a different way fix this issue. We can simply resolve this issue by adding ARMII::MO_PLT flags with MachineInstrBuilder in FastISel pass (without failing back to DAG lowering). The new patch is attached, and the test case is not changed. Sorry for your inconvenience. Please have a
2012 May 11
22
[Bug 49786] New: In xterm, some rectangles are not redrawn when the window is partly covered
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49786 Bug #: 49786 Summary: In xterm, some rectangles are not redrawn when the window is partly covered Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: 7.6 (2010.12) Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal
2013 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses() causing failure in PickNodeToScheduleBottomUp() ???
Hi, I have an assert firing due to PickNodeToScheduleBottomUp(): 1. having a CallResource in use pushing an interference of current SUnit. 2. having no more SUnits in the AvailableQueue 3. The only interference being the SUnit that just failed due to a Call Resource. 4. An attempt to duplicate this node which has the 'Call Resource' as a physical register. Thus the call
2013 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] Broken PLT on ARM from R183966
I'm not very familiar with relocations but your fix looks the same as ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall, so from that perspective it lgtm (but I may be missing something). On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Logan Chien <tzuhsiang.chien at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Anton and JF, > > Thanks for your review. After reading the source code more carefully, I > have come up with a
2013 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] [X86] DAG Combine - VSELECT
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Juergen Ributzka <juergen at apple.com> wrote: > I see. We still can use that shortcut to catch the simple case after type > legalization, but we could also do a more elaborate type check before type > legalization to enable it? > If you're going to write the code to check the types anyway, it's probably clearer to remove the
2015 May 11
0
"Retransmission Timeout" results in dropped calls after 32 seconds
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joshua Colp" <jcolp at digium.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 12:32:06 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] "Retransmission Timeout" results in dropped calls after 32 seconds > > Andrew Martin wrote:
2015 May 11
2
"Retransmission Timeout" results in dropped calls after 32 seconds
Andrew Martin wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- <snip> > > By doing a number of test calls today, I have managed to reproduce this while > sip debugging was on, so I have that information available now as well: > http://pastebin.com/ZJqzdvY3 > > This was a call from 113 to 146 via a queue. Note that the asterisk server is > at 10.10.32.251. I see the following:
2015 May 11
0
"Retransmission Timeout" results in dropped calls after 32 seconds
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Martin" <amartin at xes-inc.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 5:12:28 PM > Subject: [asterisk-users] "Retransmission Timeout" results in dropped calls after 32 seconds > > Hello, > > I am
2008 Apr 23
1
my samba hangs for 60 seconds
Hi, my samba hangs for 60 seconds and then work like normal. Why? Not able to find any reason..please help me. [global] encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 max log size = 0 volume = Fedroa map to guest = Bad user security = share workgroup = xxx server string = PD netbios name = xxxx log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log # guest account = smbguest #
2008 Feb 19
1
Restricting registration for peer 'iaxmodem0' to 60 seconds
I have setup hylafax today, along with iaxmodem. I'm just starting the debugging process and see the following message every 60 seconds: [Feb 19 17:44:16] NOTICE[1996]: chan_iax2.c:6021 update_registry: Restricting registration for peer 'iaxmodem0' to 60 seconds (requested 300) Can someone tell me what this means? Why is it there? And how do I get rid of it! Thanks, MD
2005 Feb 15
2
why does the Polycom IP600 check FTP every 60 seconds...
Hi, I am mostly happy with my Polycom IP600 but it apparently needs to check the FTP server every minute. I couldn't find any obvious setting related to that behavior in the configuration files. Any idea how to curb the IP600's spurious network activity? Thanks, -- Lord, protect me from your followers.
2005 Oct 16
1
Restricting registration for peer '611' to 60 seconds (requested 1200)
I have never noticed the message prior my upgrade of CVS head: chan_iax2.c:5589 update_registry: Restricting registration for peer '611' to 60 seconds (requested 1200) What does it mean, and how can I fix it? 611 is a firefly soft phone. bye Ronald Wiplinger