similar to: back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

I setup a CentOS 6 server to use with KVM/QEMU, and I am getting the following error a good bit, granted it doesn't seem to be causing any trouble. I figured I would post and see if anyone has any ideas on the issue, or if I can just dismiss it. If I look at my logging/dmesg, I see: do_IRQ: 19.217 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) do_IRQ: 3.178 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) do_IRQ:

I have one xen machine where dom0 libata and pcibacked domU eth0 share a physical IRQ. I thought that the disk was bad (cause the system was crashing and giveing me disk errors) and replaced it with an IDE disk connected to a pcibacked SATA-IDE combo card. Problem seems to have gone away. The machine runs stably and hasn''t crashed yet. Now I have another machine where I pciback usb.

hi,everybody There is a function do_IRQ() in file xen/arch/x86/irq.c, but where does do_IRQ() be called please? Thanks! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I try do implement tests for my puppet code and was playing with rspec-puppet but the following code gives me errors require ''spec_helper'' describe ''irqbalance'' do it { should include_class(''irqbalance'') } it { should include_class(''irqbalance::data'') } it { should

After updating to centos 4.3, I notice a failure in terminating irqbalance whenever i shutdown the system. Checking the services after the system reboot i see the error in irqbalance: "irqbalance dead but subsys locked" Can anyone tell me what irqbalance is and if it safe to disable it ? Why i dont see it in centos 4.2? Thanks in advance. Thai

(copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be overkill. Would it? I thought irqbalance is actually required even for native with

Asterisk users, I posted the following email to the Fedora users list <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-March/msg04154.html> and it got no responses, so now I'm calling on your expertise. Please take a look at it and share your knowledge on the subject with me. Additionally, let me know if you believe what I am trying to do is critically flawed. It's possible

I've got several SMP machines, some running CentOS 4.3 and some running Fedora Core 4. All machine are kept fully updated. A few are Pentium3-based and a few are Pentium4-based. They are all running the irqbalance daemon. The distribution of interrupts across CPUs is indeed kept balanced, yet even after months of uptime ps shows no CPU use whatsoever by irqbalance. This from a

Hi All, If I turn off irqbalance xen/arch/x86/irq.c, does that actually stop XEN from balancing irqs across different physical cpus, or will that override the setting if there are too many interrupts and one of the cpus is overloaded. Example: i have 4 cpus and i have configured irqbalance= off, so there is no irqbalancing done by xen. Now if i have affintized all my physical interrutps to one

I see the following on one of my new servers: -ts10::sedwards:~$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 2979045 2988620 87780075 87779501 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 1 3 2 3 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 0 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 0

I am running irqbalance with default configuration on an Atom 330 machine. This CPU has 2 physical cores + 2 SMT (aka Hyperthreading) cores. As shown below the interrupt for the eth0 device is always on CPUs 0 and 1, with CPUs 2 and 3 left idle. But why? Maybe irqbalance prefers physical cores? My understanding, though, is that the even-numbered CPUs are the physical cores, with the

On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 03:10 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > (copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be

Hi All, So I''ve got a DVB-S PCI Express card ($30 USD Twinhan AD-SE200 off eBay) that''s being passed via VT-d/pciback in Xen 3.2.1 under CentOS 5.2 to a Windows XP SP3 which works! ... except for one small issue... Motherboard is an Intel DQ35JO that much people has had success with and an Intel E8400 CPU. The issue is that when dealing with FTA MPEG-2 transport streams (DVB-S

On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: >>> Kevin Stange, >>> It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or firmware of the NIC >>> card. Hope that helps! >>> >>> Xlord >>> -----Original Message-----

Hi All, We have a xen server and using 8 core processor. I can see that there is 99% iowait on only core 0. 02:28:49 AM CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %idle intr/s 02:28:54 AM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.65 0.00 0.02 2.24 85.08 1359.88 02:28:54 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.21 0.00 0.20 3.19 0.40 847.11 02:28:54 AM

I am playing around with irqbalance to tune my 8 core system so I came across this page, http://kb.fusionio.com/KB/a65/irqbalance-avoid-overloading-cpu-0-with-interrupt-requests.aspx Now, lets say I disable irqbalance which will stop my autobalance and I pin all of my interrupts to core 0 and pin eth0 and eth1 to core 1. My application is network and CPU hungry. I am planning to dedicate cpu 3 to

Hi, folks, Since I've gotten a total of one response in days on the HP forum, maybe the collective mind here has an answer.... As I've mentioned in other posts, we have an HP dl580 g5 that started throwing ECC errors. But wait, it's worse: memory is mirrored.... And the thing is fully populated with 32 DIMMs. I took my best guess, pulled the matching set of DIMMs, and took two

Has anyone had any compatibility issues with a TE110P card installed on a Dell Poweredge 1950? I noted the following error on the LCD display of the Dell Poweredge 1950: E1711 PCI PErr Slot 1 E171F PCIE Fatal Error B0 D4 F0. The Dell hardware owners manual states that it means the system BIOS has reported a PCI parity error on a component that resides in PCI configuration space at bus 0,

On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: >>>>> Kevin Stange, >>>>> It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: > Kevin Stange, > It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or firmware of the NIC > card. Hope that helps! > > Xlord > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin > Stange > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM > To: centos-virt