similar to: Timeout on deletion

Hello, I am trying to use ACL and link-dest without success. Here is what I do. First step, without ACL : rsync -ai --link-dest=<date_folder_1> --link-dest=<date_folder_2> /sourcedir myserver::backup/$(date)/ All works fine there, my files are hard linked together, "ls -li" on myserver confirms. Second step, adding ACL : rsync -aiA --link-dest=<date_folder_1>

Hello, I make my production backups with Rsync. Here is an example of my backup tree on the destination server : /backups /2013-04-03 /2013-04-02 /2013-04-01 /2013-03-31 /2013-03-30 /2013-03-29 At the end of the backup process, I upload a logfile in the backup directory and delete oldest backups. For this, I use an include/exclude file, for example this inclexcl.txt

Dear list, I am running dovecot 1.2.15 on a Debian server. One user reports continuous problems synchronising her mailbox via IMAP (offlineimap, via SSH tunnel or SSL socket). It seems that she has a large, locally-created message, but the uplink bandwidth seems to be not enough to push it before dovecot times out the APPEND command. The error/exception happens inside offlineimap's Python

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8130 Summary: ACL and link-dest do not work together Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: az9901 at gmail.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De

Hello everyone, I'd like to ask you a question again, basically focusing on referring to different objects. Let's suppose we create the following databases this way: id <-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3) a <-c(3,1,3,3,1,3,3,3,3,1,3,2,1,2,1,3,3,2,1,1,1,3,1,3,3,3,2,1,1,3) b <-c(3,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,2,1,1,1,2,1,3,1,2,2,1,3,3,2,3,2) c

Hello everyone, I'd like to ask you a question again, basically focusing on referring to different objects. Let's suppose we create the following databases this way: id <-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3) a <-c(3,1,3,3,1,3,3,3,3,1,3,2,1,2,1,3,3,2,1,1,1,3,1,3,3,3,2,1,1,3) b <-c(3,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,2,1,1,1,2,1,3,1,2,2,1,3,3,2,3,2) c

Dear R-community, I'd like to ask you a question concerning R again. I try to keep this simple because I am not willing to confuse you at all. I have a little data frame which I have created the following way: a <-c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5,6,6,6,6,6) b <-c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) df

First, a little background: I successfully migrated the samba PDC funtionality from an old Suse machine to a new debian-based one. The old machine was named PHOENIX and had an ip address of 10.10.10.4. The new one has the same name but is on 10.10.10.14. Everything is working just fine with this new domain (authentication, adding users, computers, printing etc), except for one laptop. Since the

Hi there, I have searched the rsync website, as well as an extensive search on google, but have been unable to come up with a definitive answer regarding whether rsync will synchronise files and directories which have Japanese characters in them. I am using an English language version of Linux, which has some directories shared via samba. Both English and Japanese language windows clients

Hello, I am going to use Rsync over millions of files, with --link-dest option. So huge read activity at the beginning of each backup, and huge hard links creation activity. Of course I will use a RAID array on receiver side, dedicated to Rsync. Do you have any recommandation over RAID type, number of disks and chunk size to use ? Thank you very much ! Ben

First off BackgroundRb rocks!!!!. Top marks Ezra, it''s gone a long way to stopping us from doing a nasty curl/cron hack :) Okay so here''s what we''re using it for. We''re synchronising data from a Filemaker database, via web service equest, into a mysql database via a rails model called ''Syncer'' [How''s that for an oddball use case!].

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, after upgrading to samba 3.0.8 (debian/unstable, i386) i too encounter similar problems as reported here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/095567.html upon logoff from a win2k(sp4) client, the profile cannot be saved and the samba logfile from the client (prinz) gives: [2004/11/26 17:57:06, 2]

I have a dumb question, is it possible to use this combination: Synchronising a remote IMAP-server and a local dovecot-IMAP-server by offlineimap (with both types = IMAP), which works very well. But it seems, that my sieve-scripts on the local dovecot server are not recognised by this combination. Is there a good debugging way for this? -- Dieter Faulbaum Elektronenspeicherring BESSY II

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 Summary: Rsync times out during deletion on big folders Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: gabriele at tozzi.eu

Hi, Would appreciate some advice on this issue. I'm running dovecot version 1.0.10 on ubuntu 8.04 LTS. Recently a user created a draft email in their client (outlook) and added a 4GB attachment. The email was uploaded to the draft imap folder on the server. After this the client would then go into a endless synchronisation loop every time outlook was opened. For example in the most

I've implemented a backups system and have come across a problem with delete-during and I/O errors. Currently I use a wrapper round rsync to create a LVM snapshot and rsync the snapshot, this works except that when the snapshot threshhold is exceeded LVM removes the snapshop, the mount fails and I/O errors happen. This is ok, except with delete-during I'm getting instances of rsync

Hi, I'm busy working on a method of synchronising playback between two ogg decoders. To do this reliably, I need to create a cross-reference of the raw & pcm offsets in the bitstream. I have tried using the ov_raw/pcm_tell calls, but it appears as if the ov_raw_tell() only updates itsself in steps of 4096 bytes (as each read callback is done). This gives me a cross-reference every

Hello, I plan to have roaming profiles and I do not want users to login twice with the same account on different work stations because then I guess there could be problems of synchronising back to the server and possible loss of data... What would be the best way to allow one user to login just on one computer and not on more computers simultaneously? (They should be able to login everywhere so

> Le 9 avr. 2020 ? 00:34, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> a ?crit : > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Cyril Servant <cyril.servant at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, I'd like to share with you an evolution I made on sftp. > > It *sounds* like you should be using rparallelized rsync over xargs. > Partial sftp or scp transfers are almost