samba-bugs at samba.org
2013-Dec-08 07:36 UTC
[Bug 10312] New: Rsync times out during deletion on big folders
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312
Summary: Rsync times out during deletion on big folders
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: gabriele at tozzi.eu
QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org
Hello,
I am using rsync to run daily backups on many circumstances and it always works
like a charm, so, first of all, thank you for creating this indispensable tool.
Unfortunately, it looks like I've found a bug: when I use rsync on a very
big
folder with the delete and timeout options, it times out during deletion even
if the process is running normally, giving the following error:
rsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(137)
[receiver=3.0.9]
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (9 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605)
[sender=3.0.9]
-1
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a destination folder with about 10.000 files (more if your PC is
faster) so that deletion of all the files will require more --timeout to
complete
2. Rsync from an empty folder to your destination folder using the --delete and
--timeout options
What happens:
Deletion of the files starts and goes on quite fast, until it unexpectedly ends
with the error above.
What I would expect to happen:
Rsync deleting all files without timing out.
More info:
This is just a guess: maybe the timeout counter is not reset during deletion?
My test command line:
ionice -c 3 nice -n 19 rsync -v -a -x --timeout=300 --delete /tmp/test
root at host:/mnt/slow/test
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2013-Dec-19 13:54 UTC
[Bug 10312] Rsync times out during deletion on big folders
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 --- Comment #1 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> 2013-12-19 13:54:52 UTC --- Hello, I encounter same issue, I have sometimes a huge amount of files to delete. Rsync daemon can take a lot of time to delete them, leading Rsync client into a timeout... Another similar situation encountered is when the daemon is hard-linking a very huge amount of files (when the client uses --link-dest) and takes a very long time to perform this task. According to Wayne : both sides of the transfer try to periodically send a keep-alive message if too much time has elapsed since some data was transferred. However, Rsync does not always check this enough in some circumstances. Version 3.1.0 has an improved keep-alive setup that may help. Note that Wayne has improved keepalive process even after 3.1.0 release : https://www.mail-archive.com/rsync at lists.samba.org/msg29431.html I have not tested it yet, but I plan to do it to know whether or not it resolves timeout problems during deletion and hard-linking. Ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2017-Jan-02 15:00 UTC
[Bug 10312] Rsync times out during deletion on big folders
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 --- Comment #2 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- Regarding --link-dest, I made further testing with rsync daemon 3.1.2. I added a usleep(5000) at the beginning of try_dests_reg() in generator.c, so that hard-linking all the files takes more than 2 minutes instead of some seconds only. Client, with a very low --timeout=10, does not timeout on this. So it's OK, no more issue with --link-dest ! Same experience with --delete (--delete-after in my tests), adding some usleep() so that deletion takes around 4 minutes did not make client with --timeout=10 to abort. Perfect ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 10338] New: Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy
- [Bug 10738] New: report --stats output when termination signal arrives
- [Bug 12522] New: [PATCH] Send last error messages to sender
- [Bug 12817] New: [PATCH] Allow daemon itself to chroot
- Can R be useful to me?