similar to: Hello EveryOne...Problems here GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Hello EveryOne...Problems here GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap?"

2006 Sep 15
3
correct opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap
Hello...after upgrade glproto, xserver and mesa it's compiz not functional. Xserver is functional and if i run compiz all sides of compiz cube are white, I thing this is probably cause new opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap. This is commit from git.freedesktop.org from last upgrade glproto, xserver, mesa Use correct opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap. Set the correct opcodes for
2006 Nov 17
1
the notorious "GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error
I'm not reporting a bug (I know it's not the right place to do that anyway), but a little help would be appreciated. Once again I run into the famous "compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error. The problem is I can't figure out what's wrong. I use fedora core 6 on an athlon XP with an ati RV250 and the radeon open-source drivers running compiz reports: $
2006 Apr 07
2
[PATCH] Add GLX 1.3 + conformant GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap support
As promised awhile ago... This patch makes compiz conformant with the latest published version of the GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap specification. It has been tested to be fully backwards compatible as well, so it will still work with current versions of Xgl. If GLX 1.3 support isn't available, it just falls back to the existing use of XVisualInfo. However, my version of Xgl is a bit
2007 Apr 23
2
ATI and GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap error
Hello, I am trying to install and run compiz on my computer since a few months yet and there is no way. Today I checked out the latest git version and it does not work neither. I have a ATI Radeon 7500 rev200 and I think thats the problem. I am using the open source radeon driver and xorg with AIGLX (on debian testing/unstable). DRI is enabled and working, glxgears, too. The output of
2018 May 12
2
Formula/heuristic for estimating packet size?
Thanks for the input! --Albin On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Orestes Zoupanos <oresteszoupanos at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Albin! > > There may be some details at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845#section-6 > > Otherwise, I hope someone else on this list might be able to give a better > formula for estimating packet size. > > Regards, > > Orestes >
2006 Oct 03
0
GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing
Hi, I have a couple of problems with compiz and I would appreciate assistance. I have compiled compiz version 02 successful however when I try to run compiz this is displayed in console /usr/bin/compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing /usr/bin/compiz: Failed to manage screen: 0 /usr/bin/compiz: No manageable screens found on display :0.0. However when I run the glxinfo there is
2007 Jan 28
4
Compiz .36 => No Borders
hi all i'm running debian sid..and i tried to compile the las version of compiz because the old version of compiz did not supported compiz settings.. btw here is what i did: 1) followed the official compiling guide => http://go-compiz.org/index.php?title=Compiling 2) try to run by launching compiz...but the only results was to not view the windows' borders.. so i searched in the
2018 May 12
1
Formula/heuristic for estimating packet size?
Note also that the packet size you give the encoder also acts as an absolute max on the bitrate. For example, if you ask for 32 kb/s VBR but give a max packet size of 120 bytes, then you're absolutely certain the bitrate will never go over 48 kb/s. Jean-Marc On 05/12/2018 12:42 PM, Albin Stigö wrote: > Just a follow up... I guess I was a bit confused about the VBR > setting. I realise
2007 Apr 05
1
compiz-0.5.0
Hello, I just tried compiz-0.5.0 on my asus laptop with a intel 945gm chipset using intel_drv on the latest FC6 and get the following messages: The latest release of beryl does have this problem. How can I fix compiz to make it work? $ compiz --replace --indirect-rendering libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is not supported by
2016 May 11
2
FLAC Visual Studio file tidy-up?
Hi FLAC Devs! I'm looking to maybe move all the .sln and related Visual Studio project files (not the source .c and .h files!) into new directories under "win32\*" within the flac reppo. Any objections/tips or reasons to leave them as is? Many thanks, Orestes
2016 May 16
1
FLAC Visual Studio file tidy-up?
Orestes Zoupanos wrote: > VS2015, considering it's quite recent and the Community Edition has a > free-to-use-for-open-source license going on. > >>> Yup, into win32\VS2010 and VS2015. >> >> VS2015 or VS2005? Currently FLAC has 2 Visual Studio solutions: one >> for VS2005 >> (and 2008) and another for VS2010 and all newer (2012, 2013, 2015...)
2007 Jun 07
2
gtk-window-decorator takes 100% CPU and doesn't work
Hi, I tried to run compiz on an intel i810 device (aiglx). According to the docs, I should: # LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=TRUE compiz --replace --loose-binding gconf GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is available with direct rendering. gtk-window-decorator: Could not acquire decoration manager selection on screen 0 display ":0.0" And 1. I get no window decorations at all 2. gtk-window-decorator
2007 Sep 01
1
intel 945GM / GMA 950 with compiz fusion probably bug.
I am having troubles having compiz fusion to work with my GMA 950. I have posted this problem on this forum, and it seems other have been affected of this recently: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=36875 Information: here is my xorg.conf: http://one.fsphost.com/jinn/configs/xorg.conf [15:52 root ~]# uname -a Linux estergon 2.6.22-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 23 20:18:37 CEST 2007 i686
2007 Apr 11
3
The direct/indirect rendering stuff and compiz
Hi, In fact, this bugged me a long time and now I'd finally like to have a solution: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8160 The issue is: compiz has now some fallback code to indirect rendering if direct doesn't work. But that's completely useless, because it'll fail some lines later, exactly here: glxExtensions = glXQueryExtensionsString (dpy, screenNum);
2006 Nov 14
1
free from GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap
You might have hear this before. I just came across it today. from http://blog.beryl-project.org/ "I am running your svn and have noticed this non-tfp Beryl, what is this? It is exactly what it sounds like, an early attempt (with some success I might add) to make Beryl run without the need for texture_from_pixmap. No more black window bug from nvidia, no more Xgl, no more AIGLX. Oh
2006 Oct 25
1
Need Help !
Hi I try to install compiz in to my FC5 machine. I have ATI Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE] card. when I try to switch to compiz I get the following error message ============================= compiz --replace gconf compiz: SmcOpenConnection failed: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed libGL warning: 3D
2011 Feb 04
1
compiz install on centos 5.2
Dear All, I know this not the right place but guess someone out in this forum will defuinately be kind enogh to advise and help me and would highly apprecite that I am new to compiz and have installed compiz but its does not work .. as it gives the following error when i run it Installed compiz as per this document http://azlan.anilezfa.com/install-compi ... nux-centos but get the
2008 Mar 12
1
XGL and Xorg confusion
Hi, As there has been some confusion over Xgl and Xorg here, I thought I'd just post this. XGL acts as a client to the Xserver and acts as a server for all programs connecting to itself. Instead of displaying its results on a monitor, it interprets the display and calls the appropriate OpenGL APIs; the OpenGL driver physically interacts with the screen, keyboard and mouse. So you do need
2006 Oct 10
1
AIGLX + r300 + compiz?
So I've spent the last few days getting Xorg pulled from freedesktop git and built. Everything seems to have worked, and I now have Xorg version 7.1.99.2 running, composite enabled, and AIGLX enabled. The Xorg log file shows: (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23 (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x24 (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x25
2018 May 12
2
Formula/heuristic for estimating packet size?
Hello, I'm working on an Opus encoder block for GNUradio (a signal processing toolkit). I was wondering if there's some formula/heuristic for estimating the packet size average case / worst case given a certain encoder setting (assuming VBR). I need to provided a reasonable estimate to the GNUradio memory allocator. --Albin