similar to: Re: install issues

Yep. Just grab the 'netinstall' iso file and burn it. (It's about 7mb) -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of William Warren Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:15 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: install issues I just realized the old server had a cd rom not dvd..:( I wonder if i can install

I have a new dell t105(opty 1210's with 4 gigs of ram..sata hdd's and sata dvd-rom). I can bot to the Cent 5 64 bit dvd fine but once it asks where the install image is i tell it cd-rom..then it rejects the dvd spits it out and tells me it's not there. the same happens on 32 bit. I have downloaded centos5 twice now, md5 verified..and even burned at 1x(that took forever). Any

I have a couple of CentOS 5.1 boxes, mostly i386, but a couple x86_64, some real, some virtual. On all of them, I have yum-updatesd configured to emit via email to root. Here is a sample yum-updatesd.conf from one of them: [main] # how often to check for new updates (in seconds) run_interval = 14400 # how often to allow checking on request (in seconds) updaterefresh = 600 # how to send

Hi Warren, you can try to configure with the following export CFLAGS="-m64" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64" LLVM: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit --enable-targets=host-only make LLVM-GCC: ../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/ --enable-languages=c,c++

Hi Warren, You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this: > Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested. > Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2. But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should use the binaries unless absolutely necessary. -bw On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Hi all,

Hi all, I've run into problems compiling the llvm-gcc frontend on x86_64. Is this not supported, or am I making an error somewhere? The procedure I followed was: 1. Download LLVM 2.0 source as a tarball (from a few days ago, during the testing phase). 2. Download the llvm-gcc4 source today, as a tarball. 3. Extract both. 4. Configure LLVM as: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > ... except that Warren’s proposal that started this discussion seems to imply that he > > has a use case that requires reciprocals to be turned off separately. > > Just to close this loose end, yes I have a use case. > > Specifically, we have a customer that turns on

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: >> >> On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. >> >> From Mehdi: >> >>> Hope this clarify where I see the

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:55 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> > wrote: > > On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >

On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these

>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when

On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share > > Updated the page as suggested. Thanks. Thanks! I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of copying the text verbatim, it should

Well that didn't work. I got a bootable dvd out of it but the centos installed did not detect the media as having the installation files. It asked for a cd instead of recognizing the dvd. Winiso cannot handle dvd's..:( Anyone have a way to make the centos installer realize all its files are on the dvd instead of looking for three cd's? -- My "Foundation" verse:

Jack, Michael, Monty, Chris, Hi guys, it's me again. ;-) The one major feature missing from the winamp plugin has been a info/comment editor option. I've been working on an idea for the last day or so. The idea was to add Warren Spits VCE program to take on this job. I've got all of the code done and I now have a working comment editor in the vorbis winamp plugin. It's all

I am wondering if there are any plans to release a large dvd iso of the centos distribution? dvd burners are taking off and this would be a good addition. Instead of three cd iso's one big dvd iso. -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the

My ogg library is located in /home/warren/local. So when I configure and compile the vorbis module on my linux box using configure --with-ogg-prefix=/home/warren/local make I get the following error during the make: gcc -DPACKAGE=\"libvorbis\" -DVERSION=\"1.0.0\" -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 -I. -I. -I../include -O20 -ffast-math -mno-ieee-fp -D_REENTRANT

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

On 11/8/06, Warren Armstrong <warren.armstrong at anu.edu.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking into using LLVM to do some optimisations of > Fortran code. As part of this, I've been trying to build > the frontend with f95 support. At the moment, I'm trying > to resolve undefined symbol problems for code defined in > c-common.c + elsewhere - I'm taking

I don’t really like the idea of updating checks of UnsafeAlgebra() to depend on all of the other flags. It seems like it would be preferable to look at each optimization and figure out which flags it actually requires. I suspect that in many cases the “new” flag (i.e. allowing reassociation, etc.) will be what is actually needed anyway. I would be inclined to agree with Niolai’s suggestion of