similar to: dynamic searchable fields, best practice?

Hi, I''m currently building a small rails application that needs to store web traffic information. Similar to google analytics and clicky. (but simpler) It needs to store refer domains and visitors. Integration goes through a small javascript snippet. My question is: What database server is the fastest and should I use for this app? I was thinking about SQLlite. Thanks for your time,

I want to create a general model ''Product'' that I will be able to store several attributes in it. For example the attributes :id :name :description are pretty stantard. So each product will have this attributes. However, I wanted to know if it is possible to create dynamic attributes. In the case of a cell phone device I might want to store the IMEI of the phone, this

Hi, I'm trying to write a general-purpose "lexicon" class and associated methods for storing and accessing information about large numbers of specific words (e.g., their frequencies in different genres). Crucial to making such a class practically useful is to get hashing working correctly so that information about specific words can be accessed quickly. But I've never really

Hi All, I''m currently mid-project at the moment, and am scepticle in upgrading to Snow Leopard. If I do, will it affect my current Ruby on Rails set up on my machine?? Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi. I would like to configure a application in ruby 1.9.2 + rails 3 + mongodb on windows vista. I know it''s work better in linux ou mac, but in my job i need to use win. I folowed the steps from the site of mongodb, but when i run the bundle install, there comes this message below. Someone can help me with this. Thanks. <internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require>:29:in

I am pretty new at rails and seem to be stuck on an issue. Trying to find a way to get me app admin to create a form on our rails app. These would include: - Select form control type - Select required validation - Select price change if selected How should I even start going at this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk"

I was just wondering about locales and .yml files. Is it better to store the multilanguage strings in .yml files than in databases? And if yes, why? I was also wondering how rails are loading this files (for example, I have 4 languages in my web app, each has her own .yml file, will my rails app loads all the files in ram and then it will call each variable inside my web app? Or something else?)

I''ve inherited an EAV database and there''s really no option to remodel it. Data is stored as key_name, key_value pairs Trying to return a meaningful, unified recordset is far too complex to be efficient. I''ve decided to make use of the MySQL GROUP_CONCAT, and CONCAT_WS functions to return a fast query result, with the consolidated fields as one string. The final data is

On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Originally, the distinguishing feature of "primitive" types was that they were enumerable and not parameterized on anything. Right. > Then we moved to arbitrary bit-width integers types to generalize things significantly (the right move IMO). Right. > Thus, integers were no longer

On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? > > Hi Chris, > > The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. > Is that what you were looking for? Yep, LGTM.

I''m trying to get some opinions on a design I''m floating ("rails way" or not?). Say I''ve got an Author model in my Blog application and I want my administrators to be able to disable authors. I don''t want to delete authors because this would cause data integrity issues (orphaned Author foreign key in the Post model). So my plan is to re- task the

I am trying to decide between two different database architectures for an application to manage properties. For capturing the property features, I have two options: a single model/table with all the features as fields, or a set of joined models - property, feature, feature data. (see attached ERD diagram) OPTION A Properties name address has_pool has_doorman has_etc. (a bunch of values, not all

Here is my weird problem. Two models like following: Lexeme id:int name:string Structure id:int ref_id:string meta_id:int Lexeme can have many structure records through foreign key ''ref_id'' in the structures table. And these structure records belonging to one lexeme differs between each other using meta_id. And if Lexeme has structures, then there must be a top_struct whose

LLVM Weekly - #57, Feb 2nd 2015 =============================== If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/57>. Welcome to the fifty-seventh issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).

> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? Hi Chris, The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. Is that what you were looking for? Cheers, Rafael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: t.patch Type:

On 7 December 2013 12:55, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> The attached

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > the RAUW. > > The trick is to

i think there ara two ways of relate products and categories , basically i want to fix one product(e.g hp dv7....) to some categories (notebook,17"notebooks...) i made a table named categorization(incuding category_id,product_id fields) then in models i write these codes below class Product < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :categories, :through => :categorizations

Hi: I am using authlogic, and following railscast tutorial. I am running into this error code with the password confirmation. authlogic password confirmation is too short Has anyone experienced this error? I need your help. Thanks in advance for your help.

I am creating forum application which needs usage of acts_as_list or acts_as_tree or acts_as_nested_set. I am unable to decide among these. please could some one recommend from their experience? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.