On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:>> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? > > Hi Chris, > > The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. > Is that what you were looking for?Yep, LGTM. It would also be nice to remove the mention from LangRef. -Chris
On 7 December 2013 12:55, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:> > On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. >> Is that what you were looking for? > > Yep, LGTM. It would also be nice to remove the mention from LangRef.I updated the LangRef and committed as r196661. Cheers, Rafael
On Dec 7, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:> On 7 December 2013 12:55, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? >>> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. >>> Is that what you were looking for? >> >> Yep, LGTM. It would also be nice to remove the mention from LangRef. > > I updated the LangRef and committed as r196661.Thanks Rafael! -Chris