similar to: Problem setting up nexthop

Hi there. My name is Lucas and I''m from Argentina. Firstly, forgive me for my english since it is not my native languaje. Now, I''ve been reading on how to compile iproute2 and found that I need to add the following to my kernel, which in my case it is 2.4.20, and it is also the one which this document I read talked about: CONFIG_NETLINK=y CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y # CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV

Hello all, I am working with kernel 2.2.20 with the necessary options configured into the kernel to support all of the wonderfully fancy routing features: - routing based on ToS - routing based on fwmark - multiple routing tables This same kernel is in use elsewhere, and is routing based on fwmark with success. This leads me to believe that my kernel is OK and that I have another

We're running a PIII550, 128 MB, 3com 3c905b-TX with SuSE Linux 6.3; Kernel 2.2.14 (see file kernelconfig) and Samba 2.0.6 as PDC & Fileserver in a hospital. Now we got the following error: Feb 18 14:39:54 file kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00110004 Feb 18 14:39:54 file kernel: current->tss.cr3 = 040ab000, %cr3 = 040ab000 Feb 18 14:39:54 file kernel:

You guys are my last resort... When i do ip rule add/ls/del i get this message: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I use 2.4.0 kernel with ip:adv. route, and pol. routing compiled in.

Hi all, I have noticed that the "CONFIG_NETLINK" has been removed since kernel version 2.4.17, does this mean that we cannot use "arpd" with kernel versions 2.4.17 onwards. vishy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot

Just wanted to let the people who have trouble with this know that I got it to work. I ditched my Gentoo install and fired up Fedora Core 4. But it was not working out of the box. When I updated to the latest kernel rpm 2.6.15 it worked like a charm :D So.. Fedora Core 4 with the latest 2.6 kernel ought to get you up and running. Hope this helps someone. My three weeks of anguish are

Hello guys! I have the following setup: Linux router acting as a gateway for several subnets in the LAN. The subnets are: 127.17.0.0/16 (will go out via NAT) 195.229.x.x/24 193.289.y.y/28 213.189.z.z/26 etc. There are about 20 subnets including the private Class B subnet. I want to mark the packets that will go on the Internet, and leave out the packets that move from one subnet to the

Hello, We have debian with 2.4.19-pre8 kernel We active the load balancing with two ethernets to internet, wih the command: ip rule add from 128.1.3.1/32 lookup host_proxy preference 2060 ip route add default table host_proxy proto static nexthop via 80.25.175.1 dev eth0 \ nexthop via 212.170.14.1 dev eth1 when see the route

(found on dslr voip forum) http://www.freephoneproject.com/nexthop/ I think this is pretty cool. not too sure how stable/durable though, at least not until there are a lot more nodes providing service. also unsure of the legality vs. your average telco's consumer tos, but it's definitely not reselling. jeff pulver (crom bless him) seemed to be fairly amused, stuff like this fits

Hello Everyone, I configured a server for a friend's Internet cafe. He has 2 ISPs. Here is what I did: ## NAT -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth2 -j SNAT --to-source 82.77.148.83 -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 83.103.190.175 ## Removing default routing /sbin/ip rule add prio 50 table main /sbin/ip route del default table main ##

I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

Hi, I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route via a second network interface. Given: - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 Where eth0's network is a "back door" to the internet, and eth1's is the "front door", I believe I can

Hi, My gateway/firewall/mailserver machine has been running 2.4.13 for a day or so now. Its basically a stock Linus kernel + ext3-0.9.13 patch (for -pre6, with the rej fixed). I'm getting this in /proc/meminfo: total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 130179072 117489664 12689408 0 46854144 69632 Swap: 1073987584 10907648 1063079936 MemTotal: 127128

hello, this is my new qdisc patch, when i recompile the kernel with this patch i dn''nt succeed please look at it and if there are any mistakes plesease send me a mail thanks in advance ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

Hi, I installed the shorewall 1.3.8-2 debian package to my debian testing machine which serves as the gateway to the internet. Since I have two other machine connect to internet thru this gateway machine, I also downloaded the configuration guide for "basic two-interface firewall" and followed the instructions. When I try to start the shorewall I get the following message and can not

This is just a rediff and retest - no ext3 changes in this release. http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The latest diff is against linux-2.4.9. The version of ext3 in -ac kernels is current. -ac's ext3 has the "buffer tracing" debug code removed from the non-ext3 files, so the 2.4.9 diff is more useful for bug hunting. I should generate a diff against -ac to enable

I''ve applied julian''s paches to a 2.6.14 gentoo kernel with the appropiate options enabled, and i''m using a modified version of the mpath2.sh script also available on julian''s site http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ Overall everything works nearly perfectly. Incomming connections to either the fios (PPPoE) connection, or cable modem get routed back out correctly. The

Hi! I''m using 2.4.17 + htb2_2.4.16.diff now. But I found the tc class show command won''t show the correct infomation like before... I got something like: # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: # tc -s qdisc