similar to: How to do this?

now i''m read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now i''m try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me about my topic ... Is it can do for real???? my topic is " now, many organization use traffic shaper for control traffic and bandwidth because don''t want something example some mac address, ip address,

now i''m read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now i''m try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me about my topic ... Is it can do for real???? my topic is " now, many organization use traffic shaper for control traffic and bandwidth because don''t want something example some mac address, ip address,

Hello again, Is it possible to split a bandwidth equally among clients regardless of its current link speed? I have a link that can get bursty at times. At any given time the N active sessions (the ones with non-empty queues) need to be serviced simultaneously, each at a rate of 1/N''th of the link speed. My case is an internet connection that oscillates between 96 kbps and 256 kbps. I

Hello I was testing HTB using IPerf TCP traffic and the results were very good. Until I tried to add some UDP traffic the results were a little strange. this is my setup tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 500kbit ceil 1mbit tc class add

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hi, I am new to this group. I use this script tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit ceil 500kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 300Kbit ceil 500kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 200kbit ceil 500kbit I like to know: If two customers of the same class (for example 1:2) work

Hi everybody! I am very glad to get htb test information from www.docum.org for the htb performance. Today, I setup a bridge using brctl. my setup as following: 192.168.2.26 | | | |------------- | HTB+BR box |-------- 192.168.2.18 | eth0 | | eth1 192.168.2.29 | | | I want to limit

Hi al.. I just write program that helps to configure tc with HTB and iptables CLASS extension. Its written in perl and uses Apache like config files. Program can be found on http://sourceforge.net/projects/ist-shaper/ or http://www.ingwar.eu.org/ist-shaper/ In few days will be new version with time aware rules. The simply config file looks like this.

Dear all, I''d like to ask for help with HTB configuration (after having read some manual pages, FAQs and forum posts). Short version: is there a way to specify infinite burst for HTB? (Infinite amount of data to use the "ceil" rate.) Long version: I have the following small topology: cable modem (uplink to ISB) | <ethernet>

Dear All I am a newbie to traffic control and i am trying to setup bandwidth restriction in my local network as well as internet access to users. I got around 60 pcs in my lab and i am planning to divide bandwidth based on classes. I am using iptables to mark packets and then route the traffic to the specified class. Following is the network setup Two network cards in the server eth0

Hello! I''ve read a lot of mail archives, but can''t find solutions for my problem. I have router with about 700 users. I''m using HTB with SFQ leaf qdiscs for every user (client ip). So, different IP can have its own rate limit. This scheme ir working fine for a long time. But how can I limit number of connections (sessions) from one host? I see from ip_conntrack

Hi, I''ve been migrating an existing htb-based traffic shaper from a hideous (I''m allowed to call it that - I wrote the damn atrocity myself) tc shell script into a TCNG configuration file, and after a few false starts I think I managed to get the syntax right. However, during tests it looks like some of the tiers aren''t passing their restrictions on to lower levels.

Hi, i´ve read about this problem but i didn´t find any solution. I have a router with nat like that: internet - eth0 - Router - eth1 - Lan I made a htb script for shaping outgoing in eth0 and it works great. The problem begin with the incoming traffic... Like other people said, when somebody in the lan uses the tipical download accelerator, the line is out because the bandwidth is divided by

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Hi, I''m trying to limit the maximum outbound bandwidth for each destination port using "match ip dport $port 0xffff" u32 classifier. But it seems that it''s not filtered by this classifier. I''m using kernel 2.4.24 with almost all filter-related options configured, and tc patched to support HTB. Below is all commands I used to configure the outbound rate.

Hi. I''m newie using LARTC. I have some pc''s and one 512/192kbits conection. I do not want that one PC uses all the bandwidth available. I made this script to limit, but I need that the applications (web browsing, messenger with cam and audo , p2p, etc) in pc''s continue acceding normally Internet. Would work this script? what type of qdisc could be added to htb in

Hi! I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I can''t really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight classes, which I set up as follows: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0

Hi, After spectacularly failing to get HTB to proportionately distribute excess bandwidth into multiple classes based on the rate, I decided to hack my requirements. Now I''m creating multiple classes with the sum of the bandwidths of the classes being equal to (OK, slightly less than) the link bandwidth. Scenario: Linux Router +------+ 256K

I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone. I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress however, I get very odd results at different speeds. With

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :