similar to: RE: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

Hi, I''ve been trying out the wondershaper script, but on several of the examples I keep getting the error message:- RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument On the following line:- tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 512kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Based on other posts to this mail list, I gather it is an issue with kernel

I am a Linux novice. I have set up a Linux Router that is running the 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 kernel. I boot to an initial router state and then I experiment with various "tc" commands by executing them at the command prompt. I reboot often to restore the initial state. When I booted up the router today I got the following messages during the boot process: Bringing up interface eth0:

Hi, On this Fedora Core Devel (Raw Hide) system, if I boot on a distribution kernel (based on 2.6.12rc1-bk2) the network is fine. If I build a custom 2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-06 or 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 kernel the network interface fails to initialise on boot with RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument. What can possibly cause this ? My kernel config should be mostly fine - I used it extensively at a time and

Hi All, We are running a 2.4.20 kernel, with the htb modules loaded, and are receiving the RTNETLINK error when trying to filter on handles. We also have the latest tc downloaded from htb site, and verified it is the executable being executed. We have tracked it to the {handle 1 fw} portion. Hardware is 4501 Soekris and WISP-Dist latest, patched with latest tc. Any ideas on what would cause

how can i get rid of that ?? i do del roots before scripting. -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl | *Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl | *Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F

Hi everybody, I''m not so glad because of the error I describe in the subject. I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via

When I attempt to start shorewall (version 4.0.15) I get an RTNETLINK error (see below). /var/log/shorewall-init.log [...] 21:02:18 Creating Interface Chains... 21:02:19 Adding Providers... RTNETLINK answers: File exists ERROR: Command "ip route add table 1 129.116.XXX.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel s cope link src 129.116.XXX.30" Failed 21:02:25 Shorewall-generated routing tables and

I am running Xen on Debian wheezy. I switched from routed networking to bridged networking. Now I can''t seem to get eth0 to come up. When the network script tries to bring it up, it gets an error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists Any tips? details below brian root@trout:/etc/xen# egrep -v ''#|^ *$'' xend-config.sxp (network-script network-bridge) (vif-script vif-bridge)

I''m using htb classes on my firewall to queue traffic and implement different restrictions on different protocols. tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 190 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:3 htb rate 2mbit burst 30k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:90 htb rate 50kbit ceil 384kbit burst 5k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:90 handle

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot

Hi List, I am new at this and trying to set up shorewall. I was using mnf-en to do it but it was using an old version of shorewall (shorewall-2.0.8-2mdk) and didn''t have the features I wanted. So I''ve installed shorewall-2.4.0-1mdk. Other bits of interest: iproute2-2.6.10-1mdk iptables-1.2.9-8mdk I''m trying to get the providers feature working. show capabilities:

When I run this: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw I get: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument The traditional interpretation of that gnarly error message is that cls_fw is missing, but lsmod | grep cls_fw gets me: cls_fw 2336 4 (autoclean) I can''t remove it because it''s in use, but all 4 statements that use it failed, so

Hi guys I have read read the why's and whyfores and howto's and whento's about posting for help, but I'm not sure whether this has already been addressed - plenty other Win/spaces-in-dir-names issues have been. I was running rsync to copy stuff off of a Windows disk onto a Windows disk on another machine via Linux - Mdk 9.1 rsync - (rsync-2.5.7-0.1.92mdk) , when I first

I am posting this here because the other posters in AppDB say the game works fine. For me, the video is slow and jerky, not playable at all. System: Dell XPS630 q9550 dual core-2, 8gm RAM, 2x NVIDIA 9800GT, lots of disk space (meets all system requirements) kUbuntu-10.04, all current updates, nvidia 195.36.24 driver. Have tried kde, gnome, and lxde desktops (compositing disabled), same problem in

You guys are my last resort... When i do ip rule add/ls/del i get this message: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I use 2.4.0 kernel with ip:adv. route, and pol. routing compiled in.

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

After an: # ip ru flush I loose all my ip rules but the priority 0 one. root@sarasvati:~# ip ru 0: from all lookup 255 root@sarasvati:~# Ok with that, but now i''m not able to insert any new rule. This leads to a total loose of conectivity. root@sarasvati:~# ip ru add from all table default RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range root@sarasvati:~# ip ru add from all

Hello, I would like to ask, if somewhere exists documentation about rtnetlink interface? Something more than kernel documentation and manual pages (man rtnetlink and man netlink). I want create traffic classes, filters and so on (only cbq classes and some filters based on fwmark), like tc utility from Alexey does, but can''t find any relevant docs on net. -- Michal Charvat Prokon

Hi all, I have noticed that the "CONFIG_NETLINK" has been removed since kernel version 2.4.17, does this mean that we cannot use "arpd" with kernel versions 2.4.17 onwards. vishy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi i wanted to get the qdisc stats without using tc. is this possible by just using rtnetlink sockets directly? if possible could someone point me to an example. thanks. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/