similar to: the quantity of imq device

imq and htb are used to control traffic. #tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 0 #tc class add dev $IMQDEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb \ rate 10000kbps ceil 10000kbps burst 15k I get the following messages: HTB quantum of class 1001 is big.consider r2q change <7>htb*g j=4129006 what is the reasonable range of rate ,or I have to set which parameter to set rate up to 10M(even

I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However, I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do: Eth1 -> HFSC ........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 please tell me the range of "prio" _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 新鲜到底,娱乐到家 -

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

bridge was configured with "brctl" three NIC was bind to br0 imq and htb was used to control traffic. #modprobe imq numdevs=3 "htb scripts" #iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i br0 -j IMQ --todev 1 #ip link set imq1 up but this can not do the traffic controling. please tell me how can i do _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 银行巨头聚会中原

Hello, Some time ago I''ve read somewhere that local traffic in IMQ could hung up the whole system but it was corrected long time ago. So I was very surprised yesterday when it occurred not true. While testing IMQ I''ve observed for some time that - if you tag some local traffic with iptables both in pre- and postrouting - kernel is hunging up. It is happening quite quick with

On my debian woody (kernel 2.4.31) the tcpdump doesn''t work with imq0 devices. If I try to tcpdump imq devices there is no packet seen: [...] rt1:~# tcpdump -n -i imq0 Warning: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: WARNING: imq0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on

''imq-2.4.18.diff-9'' patched to kernel18 and ''iptables-1.2.6a-imq.diff-3'' patched to iptables-1.2.6a the following options are choosed: Networking options ---> IP: Netfilter Configuration --->IMQ target support (as a module) Networking options ---> IPv6: Netfilter Configuration --->IMQ target support Network device support --->IMQ

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

I''m running 2.6.7 + (julian''s multi-path patch) + IMQ (imq2+beta6) and I got the following on my console while doing some stress testing: KERNEL: assertion (tp->retrans_out == 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1827) I don''t know what I would do to try to reproduce this condition; it only appeared once. tcp_input.c sounds deep enough to scare me off from looking

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --

hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel (2.4.21), iptables (1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run "modprobe imq numdevs=1", the system returns - imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy the transcript is below - [root@vmlinux project]# modprobe imq numdevs=1 /lib/modules/2.4.21-BW/kernel/drivers/net/imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy

htb was used to control traffic stuctrul is like that(default is 1:20): |----1:100 |------1:10| 1:1| |____1:110 | |------1:20 #AC="tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1" #$AC u32 match u32 0xac100b00 ffffff00 at 16 flowid 1:10 #$AC u32 match u32 0xac100b01 ffffffff at 16 flowid 1:100 I copy a file to 172.16.11.1 class 1:100 go into

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 2 $AC 1:2 classid 1:12 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k please tell me if i do not set prio, what is the default prio? low delay class

imq and htb are used to control traffic. When I create a bridge with the bridge-utils, I get a new device : br0. I can shape traffic on this device, but I can not use iptables to mark packets. I used ipmode http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#bridging my kernel is 2.4.19 when i compile kernel I get the following error: br_forward.o error 1 first_rule error 2 if I used ipmode, then I can

Hi All, I''m trying to create a contended section of bandwidth using IMQ. I have the imq0 device up and running, with traffic passing through it. Firstly, I need to throttle the entire device imq0 to 2mbit/s. I would then like to add throttle rules for individual IP addresses, allowing them to pass up to 512kbit/s each, as long as imq0 has not reached its 2mbit/s. The configuration

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq perturb 10 I want to set perturb to 8 then i used this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq perturb 8 system give me the following message RTNETLINK file exists I delete the rule by this :"tc qdisc del dev eth0 root sfq perturb 10" please tell me how can i delete the rule by another way and where is "RTNETLINK file"