similar to: use or non-use of multiple processors in forwarding

mdew:~# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 12 r2q 1 Cannot find device "imq0" mdew:~# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted ipt_REDIRECT 728 0 (autoclean) ipt_MARK 728 2 (autoclean) iptable_mangle 2100 1 (autoclean) ipt_REJECT 2712 4 (autoclean) iptable_filter 1672 1 (autoclean)

Just a quick question... Is there a way to do content based routing (i.e. routing based on a TCP or UDP port) without using iptables, i.e. using the ip command? Thanks Andrew _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi all, This is my first message to the group.My name is Anirban Chakraborti and I am with new mexico state university. I have recently built a router using suse linux.I need to turn on IGMP and PIM to allow it do multicasting.How to do that? Secondly I also want to control the rate of the datatransfer from the router''s ethernet interface to the ppp interface. Thanks for the

Hi, All, So far, all the applications I have seen for Iptables are focusing on connecting a WAN with one IP address to a LAN and using NAT. My question is if the iptables support multiple IP address on WAN side? If so, how it works (you only have one NIC on WAN side)? Is static NAT (it might not be the right term, I mean a static and permanent connection between WAN IP address and LAN IP address)

... do not work anymore. Anybody with a hint? I''ve got a fully functional HTB setup and just wanted to replace the kernel from 2.4.17 to 2.4.19. In the end the modified tc binary doesn''t recognize "tc filter add" (yet it does accept qdisc show and recognizes htb...) I''ve downloaded the 2.4.19 from kernel.org, iproute2 (2.4.7), installed the patches

Hello Sir, I want some help from you. I have my configuration like this. I have three machines. PC1,PC2,PC3. hub hub PC1--------------------PC2-----------------------PC3 eth0 eth0,eth1 eth0 I want to work my configuration like diffserv. I am generating traffic from PC3 and sending it to PC1 via PC2(as a router)and from

hi all, i have been able to find only a trickle of information concerning possible strategies for a 2 adsl setup using two different isp''s. has anyone had experience in the usa or elsewhere working with their providers to carry bgp tables, or would you recommend/implement a round-robin arrangement? how ? :-) yours sincerely christopher cuse, rhce/ccna ccuse@tiscali.fr redhat 8.0

I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet connections do NOT have equal bandwidth How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure sharing of the gateways with the correct ratio of usage and with the correct source IP address? I

I''ve read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I''ve read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP and port for the traffic. What I would like to do is 1) from the ISP standpoint,

Hello, I am trying to make a load balance at my box using two conections. I have compile my kernel with this patch routes-2.6.13-12.diff (tha I get from this website: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#routes). The problem is that when I try to balance using weight sintaxe (i will put the script bellow) some conectios just drop. So I can enter some pages but other I could not...

Hello, I hope i wont make it too complicated and sorry for my englihs... The company has multiple connections to the internet ADSL + CABLE + XDSL... and i only want to use two for load balancing for now. I have read the HOWTO and i got it up and working it works great but i still have a few questions if anyone could help! the setup is: ADSL on ETH0 and CABLE on ETH1 When i load balance on

Hello, I have a Compaq Proliant i850R, running RedHat 7.1. There are 3 NICs attached to it, 2 eepro100, and 1 ThunderLAN driver v1.14a. This box is being prepped to be a download server. GOAL: Requests are sent to each NIC via seperate IP addresses. All 3 are on the same subnet. All requests are load balanced via a DNS server. We want all requests to exit the same NIC that they entered. PROBLEM:

imq and htb are used to control traffic. When I create a bridge with the bridge-utils, I get a new device : br0. I can shape traffic on this device, but I can not use iptables to mark packets. I used ipmode http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#bridging my kernel is 2.4.19 when i compile kernel I get the following error: br_forward.o error 1 first_rule error 2 if I used ipmode, then I can

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

The subject says it all really, I''m pretty sure the system and bios are NUMA aware but I''m not sure if it''s enabled? Is it supported in 3.2.1 stable? Thanks, Rob \ \/ /___ _ __ |___ / |___ \ / | \ // _ \ ''_ \ |_ \ __) | | | / \ __/ | | | ___) | / __/ _| | /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)_____(_)_| (XEN) Xen version 3.2.1

is there anybody who can tell me how to forward request to other host, i would like to forward all dns requests to other dns server and it must be done with packet forwarding because dns server (resolver) must go down. There is many docs about port forwarding based on nat table and explanation consider linux box act like nat with two e cards. thanks, alens

Is there any linux distribution, with redundant internet connection management by ip included ? Thnx -- VETSEL Patrice Forum d''aide DEBIAN Francophone sur : http://kagou.tuxfamily.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I have a linux box loaded with RH7.1, 3 ethernet with load balance on 2 ISP. In theory, if one router stop to work (I have turn off for this try), the Dead Gateway Detection, would re-instradate alla traffic on other link. This not work...someone have more experience on this? Giorgio Biondi

Hi all, Has anyone implemented trunk to trunk forwarding with an asterisk PBX. For the purpose I have in mind its quite important that once the call has been sent onwards to the new desination the lines into the PBX are no longer held. If anyone has UK-specific experience of getting this up and running that would be incredibly useful! Nic

Hello, I have some diagnostic Info for you. Tried to get xen-4.0.1 working on another node of my cluster. Only difference: Newer revision of the Hardware. Exactly same Software Stack. Stack: Ubuntu Lucid 64bit, xen-4.0.1 from Source, selfbuilt linux-2.6.32.27 from xen/stable-2.6.32.x Nodes working: HP DL380G5 16GB (Intel X5460) Node not working: HP DL380G6 16GB (Intel X5550) Effect: Xen