similar to: fragment caching with search box

When I initially start up my server I have two thin processes running that are only about 200M in size. They slowly creep up a few megs an hour until now a week later they are at 400M and 300M respectively. I realize that my site (http://wlodb.com) has some intensive pages that take a couple seconds to render (most notably http://wlodb.com/compounds ) but I''m wondering if this is

Dear listmates, I've recently moved a server from RHEL5 to CentOS 5.3 after it was decided not to renew the subscripton. Everything works beautifully except for Bugzilla, which throws MySQL errors. For example, the sanitycheck.cgi page says: # # # Bugzilla ? Sanity Check * Home * | New * | Search * | * | Reports * * | My Votes * | Preferences

First off, hi, I''m [obviously] new :O) Please excuse my question as I''m sure it''s been answered, but I can''t find it anywhere. I have a table of categories: id name 1 Foo 2 Bar I have things which belong_to categories: id category_id subject date 1 1 my subject 07/09/2004 and Further classifications which belong_to categories: id category_id name 1 1 More

Hi everyone, I''m working on creating a site that functions similar to digg.com (please no "no more digg clones" remarks please! :) ). One thing I really like about digg is there URLs are very nice to read and I would like to emulate that without having a lot of actions spread out all over my application. So in my app I have three main resources: Users, Tags, and Items

I''m having a terrible time trying to test a nested route with rSpec. I can''t seem to tell rSpec to expect the call @item.user. The following error message plagues me not matter how I try to fuss with the mock: Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''ItemsController handling POST / items should redirect to the new course on successful save'' Mock

How do you go about implementing and rspecing subdomains as account keys? I''m sure that this must be an issues for others as well. So I have an app using subdomains as account keys. The Application Controller sets up @current_company in a before filter. Everything is done within the context of the @current_company. After reading about Demeter''s Revenge

Hi, When upgrading to rspec/rspec-rails 1.2.6 gem (from 1.1.12), I''m having a new problem verifying routes that should not exist. This is to support something like this in routes.rb: map.resources :orders do |orders| orders.resources :items, :except => [:index,:show] end I used to use lambda {}.should_raise( routing error ), but it stopped detecting any raised error.

Hi Gurus, I''m trying to tackle a drop down list. I have category and item dbs, and they''re wired up with category has_many :items and item belongs_to :category, and an item has a category_id. I have this code in my new/edit.html.erb for item: <%= f.collection_select :category_id, Category.find_main, :id, :header, {}, :multiple => false %> And a pretty drop down list

Hi. Im new to Ruby and new to Ruby on Rails and have problems realizing a =20= simple many_to_many relationship: My tables: items <-> items_users <-> users ------------------------------------------------------------------------=20= -------------------------------------- id user_id = id name item_id name ... = password = ...... My Code: class

I''m trying out inherited_resources and so far so good. However, one problem I''ve run into is that it''s very difficult to customize inherited_resource behaviour in subclasses. Looking through the source I see it uses things like undef_method and class_attribute. For example, if I have the following controllers: class ItemsController inherit_resources actions :new,

I can''t understand why authenticate_or_request_with_http_basic keeps failing even though I am entering the correct info. If I try to access /admin/items/new, I enter the correct info but I keep getting prompted. The strange part is that when I cancel out, I get "HTTP Basic: Acce". Here''s the controllers: class Admin::BaseController < ApplicationController

Hey :) I''m trying to create a method for making a sitemap dynamically. It works great for flat sites where you simply have your controllers in the app/controllers directory. In this case, I can extract the controller names like, @controllers ObjectSpace.subclasses_of(ActionController::Base).each do |obj| @controllers["#{obj.controller_name}"] = obj end However,

Hi, I ran in trouble with unexpected rollbacks using cucumber 0.3.0. My feature-file looks like Scenario: Create Valid Item Given I start and the step is Given /^I start$/ do get "/items" end In my log/test.log I get SQL (0.2ms) SET NAMES ''utf8'' SQL (0.2ms) SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0 SQL (0.1ms) BEGIN Processing ItemsController#index

From the API I was unable to determine if the new architecture for BackgrounDRB still handles fragment caching? If so, how can I use it? I am upgrading to the new architecture from the old one and used this functionality in the old code base. I like the new architecture, thank you. Cheers, Matt

<% cache(:part => @user.id) do%> in the file controller => users, action => show. Regardless if you put the action so it ends up as <% cache(:action => ''show'', :part => @user.id) do%> or the controller, the file will come out in "tmp>cache>`SERVER`>users>show>1.part=userid#.cache . Which is fine except for the 1 in the cache

I''ve got a site that uses fragment cache stored in tmp/cache. When you access it as http://www.site.com it creates a folder tmp/cache/www.site.com. Likewise, when you access it http://site.com it creates af older tmp/cache/site.com I believe it does the same with sessions, though I store those in the DB. How do I go about fixing this? Can i redirect using .htaccess or Webmin? --

Hello. I wouldn''t mind getting some feedback about the use of fragment caching. I''ve got a series of relatively expensive database queries with their respective partials cached and everything is working fine. The problem is that do get this to work I''ve had to move the database queries from the controller into the view layer so as to avoid them being called if the

Hi All, We have four domains setup for The Couch: thecouch.org.nz, thecouch.co.nz, www.thecouch.org.nz and www.thecouch.co.nz. They are all handled by the same rails app. The means that fragment caching creates four folders in our cache directory, named after each URL. This introduces two problems: 1: We are caching 4 times as much stuff as necessary 2: Our cache sweepers are only sweeping one

Hi All, We have four domains setup for The Couch: thecouch.org.nz, thecouch.co.nz, www.thecouch.org.nz and www.thecouch.co.nz. They are all handled by the same rails app. The means that fragment caching creates four folders in our cache directory, named after each URL. This introduces two problems: 1: We are caching 4 times as much stuff as necessary 2: Our cache sweepers are only sweeping one

Fragment identifiers, it took me 30 minutes just to figure out what they are called. I would like to be able to create url that looks like this: post/view/id#comments How do I do that with a link_to function? link_to "Comments", :controller => "post", :action => "view", :id => post.id ??? Thanks guys! :-) John Kopanas http://www.kopanas.com