similar to: ActionMailer and Sender validation frameworks ( DKIM or SPF )

I was spamassassin update spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.0-1.el4.rf Complete! and then,Require Perl-Package installed [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent,

Hi Dear Community Friends, it is few days now, i am trying to figure out why DKIM is working / not working. Any assistance would be very much appreciable. Server IP is not blacklisted ever, MX, PTR SPF, DKIM records are available in DNS. why it is working at Gmail, why failing at Yahoo? Gmail dkim=pass header.i=@digital-infotech.net Yahoo: domainkeys=neutral (no sig);

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

I was wondering if there was any way to set the ''Return-Path'' of an email when using ActionMailer. Without the ability to set the ''Return-Path'' of an email, it is impossible to avoid being labeled as ''spam'' by many SMTP gateways if trying to send mail on another''s behalf. SPF doesn''t care about the

On 2019-09-17 09:06, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > Hi guys, > > when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I > received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this > problem and if so how? > That is why DMARC took 10 years of heated discussions, before it was actually implemented - in first place by big boys who will never

Hello again, I noticed mails from the Dovecot list break DKIM signatures. Perhaps it's something to look at? Most lists I'm on manage to pass messages with DKIM intact. Authentication-Results: abc.abc.abc; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=mrstuudio.ee header.s=mr header.b=M03Fp5lE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=dovecot.org; spf=pass Thanks, Reio -------------- next

Hi guys, when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how? This is the first report: This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200. The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy. For

Greetings, I have found an issue in the interaction between sieve vacation messages and the SPF, DKIM and DMARC email validation systems. For example, let's say we have a message coming from a at a.com to b at b.com at a server imap.mydomain.com. The account b at b.com has a vacation rule in sieve, and that generates an autoresponse to a at a.com. Our problem begins with the definition

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

On Fri, November 7, 2014 12:10, Bob Marcan wrote: > Hi. > Your mails to centos mailing list are constantly marked as spam by > gmail.com. > Marking it nospam is annoying and had no effect on gmail filtering. > I can filter it into the proper folder, but this will only fix my problem. > Can you do anything in that matter? > > Best regards, Bob > I do not think that I

I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that. I am on the Postfix list where this does belong, but I looked at the problem and decided it

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

> Let's say we have dovecot + sieve plugin container. > Dovecot configured to use remote SMTP submission host to send messages: > submission_host = postfix.example.com:587 I reviewed my config to see how i did it. I think you are right and SASL isn't used here. I have dovecot and postfix on the same machine and in dovecot i set submission_host = localhost:25 Then in my

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hello Mike, Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a dynamic one. Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials. Kind regards, Andr? On

On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me> wrote: >Hello Mike, > >Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a >dynamic one. > >Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as >long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. > >Unfortunately, some ISPs are

On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a >virtual >server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home >record >on dynamic dns. It's really effective. > >On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" ><fsantiago at

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from