similar to: Problems with source routing

I am not sure why I am getting this message, I have an outbound route that goes to asterisk gateway1 then asterisk gateway2 When all lines on asterisk gateway1 are full, I get the message " all our circuits are busy now" then few second later, the phone rings, going to the second route! And the call can be established, how can I get rid of this message?? thanks --------------

Hi, I am trying to categorize the network traffic and to send it out across two different providers. For this I mark the packets in the firewall (in the PREROUTING chain of table mangle), and then use another routing table for the marked packets, which has a different gateway from the main routing table. Basicaly I am following the cookbook example in this page:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 Bug #: 1977 Summary: ProxyCommand seems to no execute shell commands Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh

Hello All, I have a media problem while using sip communicator user agent with asterisk behind NAT.I had enabled the debug mode in asterisk and capture the results.I have attached the results with this mail.Can any one help me to fix the problem? Thanks in advance, Partha __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hi, I'm trying to share a machine that's on the other side of a gateway. The machine being shared is a Linux (kernel 2.2.1 (RedHat 5.2) and samba 2.0.3), and the box trying to access it is NT4.0 with SP5. It looks something like this ------- --------- ------ |Linux|-----------|Gateway|----------| NT | ------- --------- ------ 192.168.32.72

Hi all, My machine has got two network cards and both of them are connected to two different ISPs. I have added two ISPs to my default gateway with same metric. Let a.b.c.d be the IP of 1st network card and e.f.g.h be the ip of the second network card i.e., Card1 - IP=a.b.c.d, Gateway=gateway1.isp1.net Card2 - IP=e.f.g.h, Gateway=gateway2.isp2.net route add -net 0/0 gw

Hello I have two DSL modems witch are connected to my isp, in future my boss want to buy another connection via DSL modem. Then i will have 3 DSL modems. With every DSL modem i get 3x8 IP`s (netmask 248) from my ISP, now i have question how to configure gateway wich tools should i use. Because ip route and next hop via. wich i use now makes his work fine but with new kernels there is an error

Hi, I'm trying to set up an AD DC in an iocage jail on FreeBSD (to avoid the issues of having the DC a file server) but I'm running into some trouble. I've setup Kerberos and can kinit OK: root at samba-addc:/ # kinit administrator administrator at BEGER.COM.AU's Password: root at samba-addc:/ # klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at

> On 8 Nov 2020, at 20:24, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> ldbsearch does not work either: >> root at samba-addc:/ # samba-ldbsearch -H ldap://gateway2.beger.com.au -U beger/darius '(objectclass=person)' >> Failed to connect to ldap URL 'ldap://gateway2.beger.com.au' - LDAP client internal error: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER

Hi, I'm trying to use SFU to set user IDs, shells, etc. but I can't work out the right magic - it always seems to use default template shell and home directory (but the UID seems correct) The global section of my smb4.conf looks like so: # Global parameters [global] log level = all:2 netbios name = GATEWAY2 realm = BEGER.COM.AU server role = active

I have the following pair of macros defined to handle outbound calls from *. Rather than specifying full dialstrings in the main body of extensions.conf, outbound dial commands are made using a macro call as follows: Macro (outbound,number_to_dial,callerid_to_present,gateway1,gateway2,gateway3,gate way4) The final gateway defined is nearly always a fallback to PSTN if none of the IAX or SIP

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

On 04.09.2016 15:18, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 09/03/2016 07:34 PM, Walter H. wrote: > >> if I would need an additional IPv6 address I'd just add >> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="ipv6addr" >> to this file; if I would need an additional IPv4 address this works only >> by a virtual device >> e.g. eth0:1 like this: > That's not true, you can add ipv4

I have setup my Asterisk 13.1.0 server with PJSIP on AWS/EC2. My basic configuration works, and I am connected to a SIP trunk using SIP.US, and have set up my inbound calling which works correctly (when I call my PBX DID, the call does come into my PBX network). The issue is that I am not able to make outbound calls, because the call fails with the error:

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table

On 09/04/2016 05:00 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 >> BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- >> NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 >> NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- >> GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- >> >> in case they don't match the first IP address? > > I'm not sure at this point. If you have to add a second ip in another > different network

Just wondering if someone could answer this question for me. I would like to route public addresses only. Their will be no firewall but maybe a few rules to deny certain types of traffic. Here is the configuration of the router. My provider gave a me a /30 link to their router also they gave me a /25 network for my customers public ip''s Their cisco router has static route entrys for my

Hi, I recently replaced an ageing server running Samba 4.5.10 with one running Samba 4.11.8. They both run FreeBSD / ZFS. The site is setup as an AD (I wrote https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS while doing it). My original plan was to join the new server to the domain, shut down the old one and rename it but renamedc complained the old name was still present so I just keep the name (gateway2).

That was the issue, thanks. I now am able to get the caller ringing on an outbound call, but an external phone number (E164) I am dialing does not ring. On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:19 PM, George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com > wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Sonny Rajagopalan < > sonny.rajagopalan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have setup my