similar to: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter.

--- Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:51:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter. > To: Eicke Friedrich <tady@gmx.net> > > --- Eicke Friedrich <tady@gmx.net> wrote: > > Mike Mestnik wrote: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/

Hi! How I can use L7-Filter (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) with Shorewall? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

I had been using L7-Filter[1] successfully for edonkey/eMule traffic until recently. I upgraded to the latest release of mldonkey, 2.5.28a, which implements eMule compatibility, and with support for Kademlia[2] enabled, network latency increases greatly. [1] http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://www.infoanarchy.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Kademlia Has anyone created a new pattern match for

Subject almost says it all, I wonder if there is a way for me to use iptables matches like l7 and/or ipp2p match in a bridge ( one ethernet in and one ethernet out ) ? Regards.

Hi, can anybody comment on the cost of matching with IPP2P vs. Layer7. Also, does a iptables rule with more complicated matching mechanism also slow down processing if all the packets are matched before they reach the rule. I.e. is the mere existence of a potentially costly rule already slowing down processing or only if packets are actually processed by it? Thanks very much in advance.

Hello, Just a word to let you know that I have improved -l7 high compression quality setting, thanks to a new processing and I have also corrected an error in the residual coding.Now it has more neatness/definition.Files size is also a little smaller (and please keep in mind that the entropy coding schemes are not optimal for now, so we can save 1.5Ko-2Ko per .nhw file). Actually I find -l7

Hey guys, Here''s an easy one. Is it possible to use the l7-filter extension on a box that performs NAT? The HOWTO says the filter only works 100% of the time if it can see both sides of the connection. I tried putting the l7 MARK rules in the POSTROUTING chain on a box that does NAT and it does successfully mark some packets. I''m not 100% sure if it''s working, or if

Hi All Is it possible to add the l7 patch http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ to the Xen Kernel Tree. I want to make sure this will not cause any problems with the system. I also wonder if http://www.linuximq.net/ kernel patch is also compatible. If someone can advise this it will be great Thanks Sassy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi All Is it possible to add the l7 patch http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ to the Xen Kernel Tree. I want to make sure this will not cause any problems with the system. I also wonder if http://www.linuximq.net/ kernel patch is also compatible. If someone can advise this it will be great Thanks Sassy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi, those who are interested in l7-filter on C4.4, here is the testing repo. http://homen.vsb.cz/~hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/RPMS/repodata/ Kernels and iptables RPMS are compiled with l7-filter. Feel free to test and send the reports. Packages are not signed, not even with special release version. Should be fixed on final release. New release should also include IMQ, ESFQ. Iproute is the only

Hi all. I remember someone in here was at least affiliated with the above mentioned ipp2p-project (an extension to iptables that allows to match peer-to-peer traffic). About two weeks ago I tried to contact the author of this extension via the address that is mentioned on the project website, since I wanted to send in a patch, but with no success. At least I didn''t receive a reply.

Hello every one! I''m making a project to a discipline in the university and the project is make a Linux router that grants QoS to Multimedia connections (the prof. say we can use Open Source Soft. :) or reinvent the wheel). I have been googeling and googeling and i found the l7-filter in source forge and the spectacular simple language that is TCNG. Well the problem is how can i

The shorewall work with l7-filter? _____________________________________________________ Keny Hayakawa Schmeling Diretor Comercial/Administravivo Tel: 5566-1465 Fax: 5566-6541 http://www.optinfo.com.br kenyhs@optinfo.com.br _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/

Hello all, Just a quick message to let you know that I have added to the NHW Project a -l7 high compression quality setting. This setting is still experimental and can be improved, but actually (I am certainly not objective) I find it competitive with x265 (HEVC), mainly because it has a good neatness. Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ You can also find sample 512x512 test bitmap images

Hello all, Just a quick message to let you know that I have improved -l6 and -l7 high compression settings. These settings are notably better now, with more neatness and more precision.I find them competitive with x265 (HEVC) now!!! Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ Else I realize that the strength of the NHW Project is that it is royalty-free, and competitive with the great x265 codec

HI I have a bridge running ipp2p blocking Ares traffic and others protocols. This bridge works fine buts since two weeks can''t block Ares traffic. All protocols block fine but Ares not (upload and download). Somebody are using ipp2p blocking the latest Ares version ? My system settings are: kernel : 2.6.13 iptables: 1.3.3 ipp2p: 0.81 rc1 iptables -L -v output: Chain FORWARD

Hi all. There is an interesting project that was called opendpi (originally by ipoque GmbH) and recently been forked and maintained by the ntop guys under the nDPI label. It offers a new and currently maintained layer 7 (L7) packet identification library. It could definitely benefit from more eyes and development effort, but at present it gives much better breakdown of traffic for ntop

... Not so long time ago there was a mail about distros. I made packages of ipp2p and l7-filter for ALT Linux Sisyphus repository -- so, now there is one more PC-oriented distro with both these tools. ... About ncsh: * new docs: http://www.radlinux.org/docs/static/en/ncsh_usecases.html (not proofreaded yet, I''ll send it to Mohan with next mail) * new capability: l7-filter frontend

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

Hi all, I have found problems in p2p traffic detection. The ipp2p module works fine but in shorewall the rules written for this protocols never match because the initials p2p connection (login) match in ''-m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT'' rule before ''-m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP'' rule, so netfilter never filter p2p traffic. I have had to run