similar to: Hierarchy of HTBs

Hello all, I am running a coop satellite link for my aviation company here in Iraq. (silly blog www.stardotstar.org). I am running tc with htb with good success so far. I am working on improving it though and need some help. Currently I have just 4 classes, syn/ack/ping, webchat, http, and then other. We are really happy with how this has improved our ability to call home from our rooms and

Le 19/02/2015 05:43, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > My personal view on installers is extremely biased toward the user > staying out of trouble, they shouldn't have to read documentation for > a GUI installer. A *user* never has to even see - or use - an installer. A USER has to USE a computer, by which I mean the applications he or she needs to get some work done. The person who gets

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > A *user* never has to even see - or use - an installer. A USER has to USE a > computer, by which I mean the applications he or she needs to get some work > done. This is a false dichotomy. I reject it. There's too much fact to the contrary. My mom has done an OS installation, she is most definitely

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

Here is what I am trying to do... I want to set it up so any traffic coming or going to a specific host is ran through 3 HTBs. Two of the HTBs are for limiting incoming and out going and I want them to then dump the traffic into the third for limiting overall bandwidth for that host. I have been using tc filter to put it into the HTBs for incoming and out going, but am having problems getting it

Hello every one! I''m making a project to a discipline in the university and the project is make a Linux router that grants QoS to Multimedia connections (the prof. say we can use Open Source Soft. :) or reinvent the wheel). I have been googeling and googeling and i found the l7-filter in source forge and the spectacular simple language that is TCNG. Well the problem is how can i

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

Hello list. I have been trying to figure this out on my own, but I guess I somewhat failed :) A linux router with external eth0 and internal eth1 acts as a gateway for a number of machines utilizing a partial T1 line (512kbps). Since the T1 is limited by hardware and by its nature to 64kbps per channel the most I can pump out of it is up+down < 512kbps. If a number of workstations amount to

Hi all, I routinesly rips my CDs to WAV and then convert to ogg vorbis format for use in my car and portable player. I don't usually notice anything amiss, but on the last track of Mike Oldfield's "Music of the Spheres" album ("Musica Universalis", at the very end crescendo), the converted .ogg file exhibits terrible distortion (sounds like digital clipping). This

Hi all, Can someone please help with a tcng setup? I have played with tc and tcng in the past, and now would like to get some serious rules in place. However, I have a difficulty in setting them up. My setup is as follows: One machine working as a firewall: eth0 is the interface connected to a 512K DSL line eth1 is connected to a LAN eth2 is connected to another LAN, a bit like a DMZ eth1 and

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

Hi again, I keep posting about my problem with HTB -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016611.html With a bit of search I recently found the exact same problem I have in the 2004 archives with some graphs that explain it far better than I did -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014519.html and http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014568.html

Hi. I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future? Anyway, for the time being the only option that seems to leave is to fwmark packets differently for each device alias and then shape based on that. Is it possible to set multiple marks on the packets? Alternatively, is it possible to check for a specific

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size > in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume > will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset > raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the > fact), there isn't a clear way to say "use

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Hi everybody! I''m using an edge bridge box with two ethernet cards to shape traffic in a WAN link. I''m running Debian 3.1 stable with kernel 2.6.8 and iproute from packages. I recompiled the kernel with the following built-in options: [*] 802.1d Ethernet Bridging [*] QoS and/or fair queueing <*> HTB packet scheduler <*> SFQ queue [*] QoS support

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)