similar to: iproute2 tool compiling problems.

Hi, I have a box with RH 7,2 upgraded to Fedora Core 1. with: kernel 2.4.26 iptables 1.2.9 gcc 3.2.2 In this momment I''m using a binary TC version, but when I try to compile, get errors in Make process. Any hints ? Bests. Andres. ----> iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz make[1]: Cambiando a directorio `/usr/local/src/iproute2/lib'' gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2

Dear all, Is iproute2 necessary for IPv6 to work properly on 2.5.59 kernel? I''ve tried all combinations in the makefile for ADDLIB and LDLIBS but still get the following errors: I''ve applied the following patches to my kernel patch-o-matic-20020825 and Lksctp-2_5_59-0_6_5.patch I''ve also installed iptables-1.2.7a. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

I am trying to build iproute2-2.4.7-20010824 from source on a 2.4.24 kernel. I have played a bit with ADDLIB and LDLIBS variables but I always get errors so I suppose it''s best if instead of playing I try to understand what does the following mean (from the README file): ADDLIB should contain inet_* functions, if your libc contains obsolete resolver library (<4.9.4) and you have no

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> This adds another inet device option to enable gratuitous ARP when device is brought up or address change. This is handy for clusters or virtualization. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> ---

On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 10:26 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > I get the feeling that the use of __inline__ or __inline (vs inline) > in the kernel may be wrong and their use should be eradicated in the > follow up patch set, but it would be cool if others have additional > insight. __inline is easy and useful to remove as it's used in just a few files. But __inline__ is used in a

I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK

hi, I have problems with tables. I installed the last iproute2: iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz on Linux 2.4.26 (slackware 9.1). I want to use 2 adsl on this server. I run this command: #echo 201 routeradsl2 >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables (only one time); then #ip route add 82.189.148.240 dev eth1 src 82.189.148.243 table routeradsl2 at this point I run: #ip route show table routeradsl2

Hi, I''m trying to compile iproute with my fresh kernel 2.6.3, it works well with 2.6.2 but impossible with this one. My version of gcc is 3.3.3 and the version of iproute2 is iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824. Any suggestion ? make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/iproute2/lib'' gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Werror -g -I../include-glibc -include

I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2

Dear List. I try to build multipath connection w/ load balance to internet with two different gateway; My system is RH-8.0 with iproute-2.4.7-7.90.1.rpm and Kernel-2.4.26 (patching with Julian A. patch),and follow guide from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt, The problem is; when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success , but only one interface is

Hello, Could you tell me how did you solve your problem? I have exactly the same problem but with this configuration: - linux 2.4.20 kernel, HTB option checked - iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz installed, which is the latest version I found at ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/ip-routing/, except for "try" or "do not use" versions. I guess I do not need patching iproute2 and

This adds the checks in 2.6 for invalid ether and deleting wrong bridge port to 2.4.27 (from Erich Schubert) Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c 2004-06-21 07:47:10 -07:00 +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c 2004-06-21 07:47:10 -07:00 @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/inetdevice.h> #include

The bridge code doesn't need a separate ioctl, mutex it can just use the existing RTNL mechanism. This avoids some races and deadlocks on shutdown. This is for 2.4; a similar mechanism has been in 2.6 for some time. diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br.c b/net/bridge/br.c --- a/net/bridge/br.c 2004-06-21 07:46:49 -07:00 +++ b/net/bridge/br.c 2004-06-21 07:46:49 -07:00 @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include

A question about the tc binary and diff file that are included in htb3.6-020525.tgz. I can''t seem to patch tc in the source tree, and that has made me hesitate to alternatively substitute the native /usr/sbin/tc for the binary supplied with the patch materials. I''m running kernel 2.4.19-r9, and when I run xingu:/usr/src/linux #patch -p1 --dry-run < ../htb3.6.tc.diff the

Hi, I have the following function that I want to apply to a list of 14 matrices (1536 x 170) of binary data: DRes <- function(x, nr = 10000, metric = "mixed", ...) { require(analogue) require(ade4) m <- c() for (i in 1:nr) { set.seed(i) x1 <- x[, sample(dimnames(x)[[2]], length(x[1,])/2)] x2 <- x[, !dimnames(x)[[2]] %in% dimnames(x1)[[2]]] d1 <-

Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply! Thank you! For more info: - Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10): http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/net-match-nfmark-in-u32.patch - Examples: http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/examples.txt --- Catalin(ux aka Dino)

Ok, I tried it out but for some reason it doesn''t take for the compile process. This is, after export KERNEL_INCLUDE=/usr/src/linux/include/ if I run export this declare -x KERNEL_INCLUDE="/usr/src/linux/include/" is there. But when I run make in iproute2 I still get the /usr/include/linux/ip.h:93:2: error: #error "Endian problem - this didn''t happen"

Hi, I am trying to compile "iproute2" (iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz, inclusively the latest HTB patch, activated diffserv components) on a SuSE-Linux 8.2 system (using "gcc 3.3", system based on "glibc 2.3.2"). It is no problem as long as I use the kernel header files of linux-2.4.20 (vanilla), linux-2.4.20.SuSE (special kernel patched by SuSE, shipped

Hi, Has anyone had any luck installing or getting it to run from a windows install? Basically I'm stuck at exactly the same point (I get the exact same messages and all) as http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2005/02/0018.html and the people who posted comments in the AppDB http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=1810. I'm using Wine 20050419 Brian

Hi Peter, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 09:33:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Ok, > > > > with Segher's help I've been playing with his patch ontop of bleeding > > edge gcc 9 and here are my observations. Please double-check me for > > booboos so that they can be