similar to: Re: return routes

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote: > My ISP provides guarantied 115kbit bandwidth for GLOBAL TRAFFIC. During the low load period (early morning, evening, night) customers can get up to 1mbit traffic. That''s download traffic we''re talking about, since you seem to be shaping on your local LAN interface? Variable rate ISPs are tough to shape right, I guess... Does this 115kbit vs.

I am trying to shape a client (somewhat advanced). This is my target: Client is 192.168.2.224. I would like to allow him to download with 500000 bits/sec in general. But, for a specific port(say 22), i would like him to download with 300000 bit/sec only. The problem is that my configuration (maybe wrong) allows him to download with 800000 bit/sec. (500000 generally + 300000 on port 22) I thought

Hi everyone, I have a linux-box connected to an internal LAN and two ADSL-connections. I am using the nano.txt setup with patches applied, and everything is working fine. My problem is that I want to route traffic to some specific hosts (DNS and mail-servers) to a specific ADSL-line. I have tried to add the following ip route add 195.82.195.0/24 dev eth0 src 83.72.197.108 proto static table

See, /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max try to change value from this file to a higher value. It may happen. If it doesn''t help go keep mailing me :). No i didn''t overcome my problem yet. But I''m close. I did what i sad in the first line of my mail and it help for some time. I think htb has some kind of defect when using ds_mark. When I were shaping download only using

Dear All, I''m using the kernel 2.6.6, iproute2-2.4.7.20020116, iptables v1.2.9, and gentoo. I have a leased-line 64 kbps. I can see the counter works in iptables, but in the htb, it doesn''t go to the right class (it always go to the default class). Any help will be appreciated here''s my htb conf #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root

Hi. I just went thru reading all of the howto and have a working implementation of RSVP over UDP encapsulation that i would linke to test, made in Java. For this, I would like to use a Linux Box as a RSVP enabled router. However, I have tried and tried to make RSVP work on linux and failed. So I wonder what I am doing wrong. Basically, on the linux box what I am doing is turning

Hi All, I am a newbie I have gone thru the archive for a couple of days now, and kind find postings that related to what am trying to do, I would appreciate it, if someone could help me with their sample script which I can tweak. My setup involves eth0 - Internet, eth1 - LAN I have 10 computers and 1 VoIP Telephone on the LAN, 256kb downlink/128kb uplink, and running Squid 2.5 STABLE 3 with

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

* sorry for the 2 previous schemas, they came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |==================== | | eth1 | A | | B | ---- | |

Greetings all! I just got a colocated server space and the ISP has given me an IP address and a routable /29 subnet. Here''s a partial snippet of the info they gave me (with the real addressess changed for privacy) ==== WAN Address Customer IP Address : 100.0.33.14 Netmask : 255.255.255.248 Broadcast Address : 100.0.33.15 Default Gateway :

I''m trying to connect to two ISPs the connections are as follows: Eth0 IP: 192.168.1.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth1 IP: 216.167.217.241 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth2 IP: 216.167.208.40 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Here are the commands to set things up: #Load modules insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2- pyramid.metrix.net/kernel/net/ipv4/multipath_drr.ko insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2-

Jens wrote: >I am trying to trace a problem I have in redirecting my mail traffic to a >different ISP. I have set up a whole bunch of logging rules but am still a >bit mystified and could use some clarification.... > >The setup (shortened somewhat for this example): >Cable connection coming into a firewall/router going to a mail server in the >DMZ. >The interface on the

Is the 192.168.1.2 an ip on the router? If yes, you''ll have to mark in OUTPUT, not PREROUTING, also, after you set up the rules and routes, did you an ip route flush cache ? I hope these works On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:02:32 -0700, Jens <jens@pacificsun.ca> wrote: > I have a particular problem that has caused me grief for some time now and > even though the answer is probably

Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. If I remove all general default routes from

Hello, i read an old message of Ard van Breemen with subject "More things about /proc / failover of default gateway" (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q1/002667.html) and tryed to do the same config. But then i''m inserting the second default route ip tells: root@epia# ip route add default via 192.168.1.1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists As i know, there are no way to

Hello, I am new to network routing and I need help configuring a linux box with two ethernet cards. In this case it''s a Linux RH 7.3 box, in a cabinet that already has a couple of Windows servers. The Windows server routing is below as an example. The Linux box has an out-of-band interface at 10.130.36.38 and a public eth at 62.50.8.84. I had to add a route for the private interface so

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+