similar to: possibly simple priority question

Hi I''m newbie on this and i would appreciate some pointers on how to limit the http trafic to my users from my linux-gateway box. Thanx in advance -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi all, I found in http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/index.html#sources the precompiled iptables shared libs for 1.2.6 & 1.2.5, but my version is 1.2.9 (in Debian Sid) and I don''t know how to patch the .deb file. I need the -j IMQ target... ¿What can I do? Thanks!

I''m playing with the rather excellent QOS script from Alexander Clouter at http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ So far I am really impressed with it - a very impressive example of the power of linux QOS rules (has pretty much everything in it from the LARTC Howto!) However, the instructions hint that "for QoS to affect locally generated traffic in a non ethernet bridge setup

Hi sombody know what is happen with Jim diGriz''s QoS Script Web Page ? www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script Regards _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I''m wondering which of these filters is the best method for filtering ACK packages to achieve lowest delay possible on a dsl-link. This one ist from the wondershaper from the lartc-site: /sbin/tc filter add dev $EXTIF parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 0 u32 \   match ip protocol 6 0xff \   match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \   match u16 0x0000 0xffc0 at 2 \   flowid 1:10 Thats a suggestion

Hi Guys, Using the 2.6.test kernel? Alex and I have done some more tests and this is the patch incase ur using jdg-qos script http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/index.html#qos-2.6 Thanks K _________________________________________________________________ Winterize your home with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hi guys, I run an internet cafe with 40 odd computers in it and would like some sugestions on sharing the data evenly for udp and tcp data. Currently i have all tcp data put into a class thats half our link speed and udp data doesnt get class''d at all. which works well but also means that the line doesnt get shared in terms of bandwidth evenly. What i would like tho is to setup a

Hello! I have a small home network and I''d like to use traffic shaping because every time someone uploads a file at full speed, my download speed drops to ~10 KB/s. My connection is 768/128 DSL. I found a script at http://www.knowplace.org/shaper/examples.html $TC qdisc add dev $INTERFACE root handle 1: htb default 60 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 116kbit

Hi there, I''ve got the following problem on my hand..... I''m a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5 different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on). For all these schools we have an internet uplink of 2mbit. And this bandwidth should be shared as fairly as possible.

Hi I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C Subnet with 512 IP-Addresses. 60% of the machines are Windows. The rest are SUN and Linux. At the moment Windows viruses and p2p-traffic eats most of our bandwidth. My Aims are:

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Hi, I can''t get traffic shaping working. This is my situation: -------- ------ Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2 -------- leased line ------ eth1 eth0 We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation

I''ve gotten wondershaper to work in my linux box, which is part of a 3 computer network that shares the same dsl connection. The linuxbox handles most bulk down and uploading, and the other 2 are mainly for surfing and such. What I need from wiondershaper is that it should perform it''s tasks with all of the traffic to the dsl modem, but do nothing with the internal traffic

Hello, Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ, are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on scheduler in Linux enviroment: Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc in a router, we know, if there is packet which want to enqueue the packet, the Function red_enqueue is called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the Function red_dequeue

Hi, I am just about to move out from my parents home and think about how I will phone from now on. In Germany there is a provider (QSC) who offers DSL (1024 down/256 up) with fastpath without volume or time limits. Does anybody know a comercial (or even semi-professional) provider who lets me dial out through H323 (or another protocol) and also offers an number where I can be called from

hi all! i have a dsl connection with 1280 kbps for downstream and 256 kbps for upstream, and i want to manage the bandwidth to give high priority to voip traffic and low priority to p2p traffic. i found the script jdg-qos. i readed on this forum (i have a dsl-g604t router with MCMCC firmware) http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16250220 that the two parameters of the jdg-qos script (DWIFLIMIT

I use SIP over VPN with RR from TWC no problem, connect via WiFi. According to http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/ I am getting 3.5Mbps down and 353Kbps up at this time (6:15pm Saturday). My laptop currently has an X-Lite (free version) softphone with GN Netcom USB professional contact center headsets (GN8110 USB XP adapter). We have found that the headset makes a major difference in the quality

Hi everyone...I'm at a dead stop setting up Samba, so let me jump right into the problem: First, the setup: I have a RH7.3 box and a W98 laptop. The RH box also has a W2k Pro partition. We have them on a 4-port 10base-T hub along with our RoadRunner cable modem. Now on to the problem: As most of you are already aware, RR uses DHCP to assign IP addresses to client machines at boot time.