similar to: Route away packets addressed to the machine itself w/iproute and Netfilter

Hi, I''m attempting to add a route via a plugin. I attempted to add the following to my init.rb: myroute = ActionController::Routing::Routes.connect "boo2", :controller=>''plugin'', :action=>''index'' puts "path=#{myroute.path}" myroute.options.keys.each do |k| puts "#{k}=#{myroute.options[k]}" end The newly

Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ? i''m trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address just like belows.. A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC (10.100.0.1) (211.xxx.xxx.xxx) (

Hi, I have a problem with GRE tunneling. I read Advanced-Routing HOWTO about this and I did all as is written in this documentation. Even the same example is here which I need for my project. I want create (by means of GRE tunneling or IP in IP tunneling) virtual private network VPN - in first phase without IPsec in other phase with IPsec. I have two local networks distant apart with two routers.

Hi, I''ve a gateway host (cali), connected to the Internet via ADSL and a PPTP tunnel (ppp0). I also have a IPIP tunnel to another host over the Internet (mytun), nothing fancy. This is working perfectly. But I want to give more priority to the IPIP packets coming OUT of the PPP (PPTP connection) interface. And I can''t get this to work. Class 2:21 is the one with high

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

Hi guys, I''m trying to setup an IPIP tunnel between a Cisco router and a firewall running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge with Shorewall 2.0.13. I''ve read and implemented the http://shorewall.net/IPIP.htm document, but I don''t understand why there should be at the same time a "tunnel" and a "tunnels" script. Shorewall still refuses to let the

Hi everyone, I have a linux-box connected to an internal LAN and two ADSL-connections. I am using the nano.txt setup with patches applied, and everything is working fine. My problem is that I want to route traffic to some specific hosts (DNS and mail-servers) to a specific ADSL-line. I have tried to add the following ip route add 195.82.195.0/24 dev eth0 src 83.72.197.108 proto static table

hello i am trying to set up ipsec in my network, for now just between two hosts, using to use AH & ESP in tunnel mode to get all of packet encrypted. keys are negotiated with racoon. mayby using tunnel mode in this case can seems strange, but i know what i am doing. after setting up everything i have done few tests with ping & tcpdump. but the results are very suprising. bellow is what i

After carefull reading (LARTC) and experimentation, I am in a dead end... I am using several IPIP tunnels (linux ipip module, IP protocol 4). I''d like to filter packets going through these tunnes to different classes, on the ingress device, based on source and destination IP _INSIDE THE TUNNEL_. First I tried the nexthdr bit. As explained in LARTC, nexthdr jumps to the next header

This is really strange behavior .. root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testing123 mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123: ip/ip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 ttl inherit root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testingabc mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# echo $? 0 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123:

I am desperately trying to impute missing data using 'imp.mix' but always run into this yucky error message to which I cannot find the solution. It's the first time I am using mix and I'm trying really hard to understand, but there's just this one step I don't get...perhaps someone knows the answer? Thanks! Jens My code runs:

Hi, I have one firewall with 3 ethernet cards, 2 internet links, one cisco 2920 and one problem in RTNETLINK ;o) Let me explain my network : | *** Internet Link 1 *** *** Internet Link 2 *** 10.1.0.1| Serial Serial | 10.2.0.1 |||| +--------------+ +------------+

Hi, I''m trying to do some horrible private address routing between networks. Is there a way to handle the following? I''m guessing policy routing *might* be the way, but anyway... Two networks, accessible via public addresses -- a /29 on each. Each network, however, has more machines than this, so one also has 192.168.0.0/24 and the other has 192.168.1.0/24. I have an IPIP

Hi I am trying to setup an ipip tunnel to another linux router and am having serious problems. A bit of background first though because we may be going at this from the wrong angle. I have a router that runs bering firewall of a CF flash card that is going to act as a gteway for the amateur radio amprnet network. Heres what I need from it- I have an internal network 192.168.1.1 etc and a

Hello, I am attempting to set an IP-IP tunnel between two PC in a same LAN in order to evaluate the performances of the tunnel (kernel 2.4.26). I read the section of LARTC HowTo about it and it seems simple but i do not succeed in setting it. I don''t find the new_tunnel.o module (cf LARTC HowTo). I found Configure.help a bit confusing : CONFIG_NET_IPIP "Saying Y to this option

? 2007-3-15???8:00?freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org ??? > Send freebsd-security mailing list submissions to > freebsd-security@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org

Hi all, When try to move a local route (for an ip addr configured locally) to a different route table from the local one I can no longer ping the address. My suspicion is that the local (0) table is "special" and used directly without regard for the rules in some circumstances, but I''d like to confirm that what I''m trying to do isn''t possible before giving up!

Hello ext3-users, we have an oopsy situation here: we have 4 machines: 3 client nodes, 1 master: the master holds a fairly big repository of small files. The repo's current size is ~40GB with ~1.2 M files in ~100 directories. Now, we like to rsync changes from the master to the client nodes, which is working perfectly for 2 nodes, but our 3rd node oopses "sometimes", rendering

Hello list, I wish to report a problem with openvpn tunnels. Synopsis: Despite adding policies to the shorewall policy file, I have to add extra rules to allow the UDP port 5000 packets to get through. I have used no particular setup guide. I believe this problem goes away with shorewall 2.0.9, as I have implemented openvpn with that version on a different machine, and I see no UDP:5000 packet

[ sorry for cross-posting this to newbies and users, but I''m a bit desperate to get this resolved ] This is strange... I had this working before without any problems, and recently we started to have some odd issues. I can''t be sure exactly what has changed as I''m unfortunately not the only person with access to the server. {sigh} The problem is that I pretty much