similar to: ip route, rule and TOS

I have two tables: table_1: tab1_id, other_id table_2: id, tab2_id, something_else I would like to specify a has_one mapping from table_1 to table_2 but specifying that the join is based on (table_2.tab2_id = table_1.other_id). I am half way there with: class Table1 < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "table_1" set_primary_key "tab1_id" has_one :Table2, :class_name

Hello Ulrik, Can you please explain this code means how and what this code is doing because I'm not able to understand it, if you can explain it i can use it in future by doing some Lil bit manipulation. Thanks data_help <- data_help %>% mutate(Purchase_ID = 1:n()) %>% group_by(Purchase_ID) %>% do(split_items(.)) cat_help %>% gather("Foo",

Hi, I want to use ip rule to policy route some traffic using the Full TOS field. I patched iptables to mangle the ip-header DSCP field. But I can only use some values of the TOS field with ip rule. How can I patch ip rule so I can do policy routing based on the DSCP field? regards Rinse _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi Hemant, the solution is really quite similar, and the logic is identical: library(readr) library(dplyr) library(stringr) library(tidyr) data_help <- read_csv("data_help.csv") cat_help <- read_csv("cat_help.csv") # Helper function to split the Items and create a data_frame split_items <- function(items){ x <- items$Items_purchased_on_Receipts %>%

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761 Bug ID: 1761 Summary: nft_fib checks only the main route table when iif is a slave of a master vrf interface Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221 Bug ID: 1221 Summary: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default route Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5

Hello all, I do not read C very well (especially kernel C). Though I have tried to muddle my way through an understanding of what''s going on in fib_hash.c, fib_rules.c, and route.c, I have not succeeded to my satisfaction, hence my post. I''m trying to document the general process of route selection, and have come up with the following overview. Could somebody point out any

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM Francois-Xavier Jollois < francois-xavier.jollois at parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Hi everybody > > I try to update R 3.1.1 to R 3.2.2 on a Debian Jessie (8.2) server. I > try to do the following steps : > > - Adding "deb-src http://cran.irsn.fr/bin/linux/debian jessie-cran3/" > to /etc/apt/sources.list > The instructions

The current CVS Project Shorewall2/ contains my implementation of this feature. Thanks go to Xavier for ideas about the design. Xavier -- please give my code a try and see if it works ok for you. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

by using these two tables we have to create third table in this format where categories will be on the top and transaction will be in the rows, On 30 August 2017 at 16:42, Hemant Sain <hemantsain55 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Ulrik, > Can you please once check this code again on the following data set > because it doesn't giving same output to me due to absence of quantity,a

Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two

hi all, I need different routes for packets with different TOS values, and tried to do this with ip. I noticed that ip does not recognice all possible values for the TOS byte, even when I enter them in /etc/iproute/rt_dsfield. to demonstrate this, I added prohibit rules for different marked packets and tried if the packets are dropped when I try to "ping -Q tosvalue <somehost>":

Dear All, I need to setup different route with different tos value. I can use the flowing command to add a tos route to routing table. ip route 192.168.0.2/32 via 192.168.0.1 tos 0x1c and ip route 192.168.0.2/32 via 192.168.0.1 tos 0x40 I used "ping -Q" to test it with different tos, the output packet is marked correctly. The problem that is only the tos value defined at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1349 Bug ID: 1349 Summary: "nft list ruleset" shows rules twice Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

Hi, Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 15:25:10 schrieb George N. White III: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM Francois-Xavier Jollois < > > francois-xavier.jollois at parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > > Hi everybody > > > > I try to update R 3.1.1 to R 3.2.2 on a Debian Jessie (8.2) server. I > > try to do the following steps : > > > > - Adding

hi i have a strange night with our firewall ;) i wanted to utilize the icmp redirect packages to connect our to different networks on the same segment i have a lot of these messages in dmesg: Redirect from 10.0.0.2 on lo about 152.66.235.1 ignored. Advised path = 0.0.0.0 -> 0.0.0.0, tos 00 --- with tcpdump i saw strange packets crawling on the lo interface ;) IP 10.0.0.2 > 0.0.0.0: icmp

Hi everybody I try to update R 3.1.1 to R 3.2.2 on a Debian Jessie (8.2) server. I try to do the following steps : - Adding "deb-src http://cran.irsn.fr/bin/linux/debian jessie-cran3/" to /etc/apt/sources.list - Execute : $ sudo apt-get upgrade $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install r-base r-base-dev - And I get this : ... r-base is already the newest version. r-base-dev is

Hi there, I''m trying to achieve the classic load balancing using the multipath. The gateways are: A (tunl0) and B (tunl1) This is the classical situation covered by the HOWTO: one computer with two Internet connections. The problems come when I try to use the same IPs for both A and B. So A is 10.229.25.8 and B 10.229.25.8. I cannot do otherwise, I''m forced to use the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262 Bug ID: 1262 Summary: nft insert rule ignores space in prefix value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at