similar to: Lamer needs help for basic tc setup

ive got problems with my network (120 people) ive got big pings (300ms)m whereas there are normally about 19ms. i do not know if my qos is proper (fast i mean). www.tdi.pozman.pl/fir2 - my qos www.tdi.pozman.pl/rules - my firewall can sb tell me if do it ok ? -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl |

how can i get rid of that ?? i do del roots before scripting. -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl | *Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl | *Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F

ok i gave up. can sb point me docs on how design proper qos rules ? about differences between them and the usage (which for wifi, which for ISPs which for homenet) ill read and do it -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl |

Hi, I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards, connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse direction. The forwarding node is

Hi all, This is probably not the right place for this question, but maybe someone can help me out. I am trying to setup a VPN between two private addresses, using iproute2 (which is my only excuse for mailing this list). The setup is as below : eth0 ppp0 Wireless ppp0 eth0

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --

Hello all, I am running a coop satellite link for my aviation company here in Iraq. (silly blog www.stardotstar.org). I am running tc with htb with good success so far. I am working on improving it though and need some help. Currently I have just 4 classes, syn/ack/ping, webchat, http, and then other. We are really happy with how this has improved our ability to call home from our rooms and

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hi, this is my first post here. Ive got working PDC on Samba 3.0.20 without ldap. Users can log into domain. 1. The problem is that they cannot browse each. other's shares. (ex. user A cannot browse user B shares ) They all can see shares on PDC and print on a printer. 2. log.nmbd shows all the time [2005/11/09 15:26:45, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(284)

Hi, more than a month ago I proposed an addition to the HOWTO to address a certain packet classification problem/bug and how to fix it (see http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016728.html). I never received any reaction from the HOWTO maintainers, not even when addressing them directly (see mail below). Given that a month has gone by: Is the HOWTO currently unmaintained? Regards,

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

here''s the output : # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 10Mbit allot 1514b level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 23us Sent 294 bytes 7 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0 class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: rate 100Kbit cell 8b prio 1/1 weight 100Kbit allot 1600b

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the

I need to shape traffic from some IP on one LAN, but I''m in trouble. There is a linux 2.4.26 connected to the Internet (eth0) / LAN(eth1) doing NAT. I''m using VLANs in the LAN Interface, that is connected to a 3Com SuperStack II in a 802.1Q tagged port. I want to create a class that will limit the traffic at 384Kbit/s. I want to create two leaf classes that limit the traffic at

Hi, I''m work on traffic shaping and I would like to know if it''s possible to mix differents Queueing Disciplines ?? I would like to combine the proporties of a PRIO discipline with that of a CBQ discipline. I read some documentation and I found nothing about that, can you help me ? I think to try something like that : tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq … tc class add dev

Hello, I'm usign Kernel 2.2.19 with ext3 0.0.7b patches. I'm also using cbq to control bandwidth. The cbq is correctly creating the classes and queueing disciplines but, whenever I call cbq stop I get a kernel panic: > Aiee, killing interrupt handler > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill idle task! > In interrupt handler - not syncing The exact line in cbq script that is

Good afternoon, I am a newbie to lartc. I have read the HOWTO. I set up a CBQ traffic control using the following commands, and it caused my VNC connection to break frequently. ======================================================================= **CBQ: cbq-1280.My_shaper /sbin/tc qdisc del dev lo root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1 cbq bandwidth 20Mbps avpkt 1000 cell 8 /sbin/tc

Using below configuration multiplied by 3000+ nodes to control bandwidth causes very high kernel cpu usage (99.5%) narrowed it down to the mangle table. Any ideas to do this more efficiently would be appreciated. The mangle table entry (indicated by ***) is sucking all the cpu. I am running RH7.3 kernel 2.4.18-3 and iptables 1.2.5 This setup has worked well for more than 1000 devices but as the

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has