similar to: HTB stalling

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Hi all, i need advice how can i limit ip_conntrack per IP. clients of network that i support often uses torrent , DC++ , eMule clients and i have lost packages because they open too many ports. i have traffic control limits but this obviously isn''t enough Any advance how to prevent server from this kind problems will be welcome. Best regards Emil

Hello all, Does anyone know of a methodology to build a route based on the inbound and outbound interfaces as opposed to ip addresses? We are essentially trying to forward packets from one interface to another without looking at the ip address. Bridging (brctl, br2684ctl) will not work in this case as the interfaces use different layer 2 encapsulation (e.g., atm0<=>eth0, or

Hi, I am trying to control bandwidths of the connections by using TC with HTB. But I want to implement Leaky Bucket on this structure so as to have a straight flow. Due to being new in this area, could anyone help me how I could do this? Does TC support leaky bucket? Best regards, Fatih Duzova

Is any way to detect changed MAC adresses? Someone taught change MACs peoples in my network and I have problems. E.g. Two computers working on one MAC, and one IP (static ARP and DHCP). WinXP is screaming some message... that two computers or more have the same IP. How can I find out who''s changed MAC?

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

In 2.4 kernels, there was a [bp]fifo that could be implemented with ''tc add'', but in 2.6 kernels, I find no way to create either of these fifos. I am able to increase txqueuelen. What I desire is a larger number of backlogged packetes before drops occur. How can the output buffer size be increased for HTB? -- gypsy

I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller flows to the point where it becomes unusable (especially if they are at all interactive) Because numflows is dynamic,

Hi! By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ. There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20 Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30? How explain it? ### imq0: queueing disciplines qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 30 direct_packets_stat 0 Sent 631429 bytes 1812 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 20) ### imq0: traffic classes class htb 1:20 root prio 0 rate 100Kbit ceil

Hi Is there a program which allow me to see how "my" traffic goes through my iptables rules? Which accept it, which deny? Right now my router has a little bit of traffic and its hard to see only mine traffic. -- Miłego Dnia Krystian Antoni _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

We have a Linux box that is acting as the gateway to the internet for about 400 people, typically there are not more then 50 of them using the internet at any given time. We would like to provide different levels of access to different users. For example 128kbps to some users and 256kbps to others. We have considered creating a class and qdisc for each user (using htb) however we don''t

Hello Everybody, I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth consumed by each of my hosts....But I dont want SNMP to run on all the hosts[as required by MRTG] I used iptraf on my linux box, but it only measures the bandwidth on interface basis only.... I tried installing traffic-vis, its not working

Well it appears i have no clue what im doing. I thought i had the below script working to shape outbound ftp traffic....however, it is shaping inbound traffic too. I have NO clue why. Please comment if anyone has any ideas why this doesnt work. I want to shape only outbound ftp traffic and not inbound or lan traffic. #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an

Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply! Thank you! For more info: - Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10): http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/net-match-nfmark-in-u32.patch - Examples: http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/examples.txt --- Catalin(ux aka Dino)

=== tc filter - based on iptables - MAC fw marking not working == DEV="eth1" tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbps ceil 3276800kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:15 htb rate 3kbps prio 4 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 500kbps prio 3 tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:15 handle

Hi folks. I started to play with tc+htb last week, and I must confess that this thing is really driving me nuts. All we want to do is control bw, with no borrowing. In order to get the feeling on this subject, I have setup the following test bed. ---A---B---C--- On B: eth0 connecting A and eth1 connecting C. The script. tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb

Hello, I''m using htb3 with kernel 2.6.13 on debian testing release. I have a hierarchy consisting of 10 parents clas each with 2 to 20 childs and every child use sfq. The problem is when the default class become congested, the system start to drop packets for 2 seconds all traffic is blocked, another 3 to 5 minutes all goes all and so on. Anyone have any ideea about this ?

Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b

Hi All, I cross compiled and run tc in arm platform. When I tried executing it I got this error. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Is there something I''m missing here... Thanks. Grace _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl