similar to: Classid limit at 10000

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hello! I was always using "default" in HTB to choose default class, but now I need to do it with filters. Tried following command: # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "10:2" is unparsable It is from example in LARTC Howto. My question is then - how to make a filter matching all without eating

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

Refering to pppoe i have next problem : I asked my isp if i can buy a class of real ip`s to be routed by them. They said elegantly it can`t be done . I want opinions . I am using an ADSL connection through a Speedtouch 510 configured in bridge. About Bgp : i asked someone if i can peer 2 different locations on 2 different ip`s using private asn number and he said yes , and what i don`t

Hi I have read various info, and mailing list archives, but have not found an answer to the following. I have a few servers with configurations similar to the following: They each have multiple uplinks to the Internet, and a sample config is as follows: eth1 is 192.168.0.1, connected to 192.168.0.2 eth2 is 192.168.1.1, connected to 192.168.1.2 My default route looks like: ip route add scope

Hello! Currently I am marking packets with IPMARK, and then using following rules: 1: class add dev eth0 parent 1:4 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil quantum 1600 2: qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10 3: filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 pref 30 handle 4106 fw classid 1:100a 4: class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil

Hello! I think 36th line of ipt_MARK which is (*pskb)->nfcache |= NFC_ALTERED; Should be removed. At least looking at that patch: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-July/020382.html -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Having a problem with classid and prio and position. Wondering if someone could help? Below I have pasted a part of my current rules, now it consists of one chain and two pipes. If they both use 60Kbit which one would get priority? Would it be the one with the better prio or the one with the lower classid or would it be the one which is first on the list? /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent

Hi all Can anybody pls explain me the difference between classid and flowid. In which scenario we may need to use either of one. Any help will be greatly appreciated. regards Vinoos. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, All, I have a class 1:10, it seems if I use netfilter mark as classifier, then the class will be refered as classid 1:10, however, if I use u32 as classifer, then the class should be refered as flowid 1:10, is it right? Thanks in advance, James

root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 flowid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "classid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable I don''t understand why it does not work. Can anybody explain me this problem? --

Hey, everyone, I am kindda newbie to this subject, so I just post my problem directly, please let me know if anything is wrong. in my config file when I use tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:11 classid 1:11016 htb rate 512kbit burst 10k everything works correctly but...when classid goes larger than 1:19999, eg: tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:21 classid 1:21006 htb rate

Hi there list, I got stuck when making tc rules to divide bandwidth between RDP client and the rest of our Internet traffic. Given the following problem: We have a school with around 900 students and staff in a temporary location (an old wodka factory ;)) on around 100 workstations. The maximum bandwidth we could get was 1536 kbit. So we decided to let the staff work in our normal network via

Hi list, I''m trying to do qos based on HTB, in my linux box wich is my firewall and transparent proxy, and I don''t have the possibility to put other machine to make proxy. Well, If I up my htb scripts, the proxy will be limited to serve my LAN as a external site and limited to the limit of 768kbits, even making two classes, tryn to limit it traffic to the maximun bandwidth

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

hello folks, this is my first post to that list. so I hope I am not completely OT here :-) reading the (excellent!) lartc and then writing my own qos-script I have still some open questions which I will try to formulate now: - "Now we can optionally attach queuing disciplines to the leaf classes. If none is specified the default is pfifo." - I can''t find info about Pfifo.

Hello, I want to limit the upload speed for the eth0 Interface for an specific IP. I used the following script, but its only limits the DOWNLOAD speed.But i want to limit both! DEV=''eth0'' tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 768kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 100kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev $DEV

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Among other things, I run an http server on my home DSL line (6M/768kbit). The content includes several large image galleries, and when certain crawlers hit our server w/ multiple large image uploads, we end up with large ping time delays - sufficient to disrupt the kids'' on-line gaming. Attempts to control this with robots.txt has not be very successful; Solaris IPQoS appears quite